最新检测宝贝们

Channel
思雨的小窝
@siyudexiaowo1314
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
307subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003903668439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @siyudexiaowo1314 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 17 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/siyudexiaowo1314 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 307 | +11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 296 | +15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 281 | +22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 259 | +16 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 243 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 238 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 238 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 30s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
PP优惠活动每天发放三张优惠券 8月14日截止 抓紧来哦宝宝们🥰🥰🥰。可约🉑上门
❤2
开课了宝贝🥰
❤1
#优惠券 🌈海口老师 #思雨 🔥于8月7日~8月14日,每天发放3张优惠券 PP优惠100🔥 🌟需要的自行与老师联系 👉 @siyubaobao521
开课了宝们
开课了宝子们 活动继续🥰 🉑约可🚪
❤2
#优惠券 🌈海口老师 #思雨 🔥于8月7日~8月14日,每天发放3张优惠券 PP优惠100🔥 🌟需要的自行与老师联系 👉 @siyubaobao521
好多人夸我嘴甜 你要不要尝尝😘可约可🚪
我觉得这个时候 你该想我了😘
❤3
开课中可约可外出
❤2
思雨的小窝 pinned «📣 TG海南修车总群 – 信息共享,资源交流 无论你是找资源,还是想交流经验、结识同城伙伴,这里都是你的最佳选择! 欢迎加入,一起探索更多可能!🚀 海南修车导航页 https://t.me/HaiNanSheng»
📣 TG海南修车总群 – 信息共享,资源交流 无论你是找资源,还是想交流经验、结识同城伙伴,这里都是你的最佳选择! 欢迎加入,一起探索更多可能!🚀 海南修车导航页 https://t.me/HaiNanSheng
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @siyudexiaowo1314. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“思雨的小窝” (@siyudexiaowo1314), 307 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/siyudexiaowo1314.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.