Channel
@sixsevenura
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002646982264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sixsevenura |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sixsevenura |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 29 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:10 | 26 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 240 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
26 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 30.8% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 26.9% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— 𝗁еႸ ,, 𝗁еႸ !! ︶ 𝆺𝅥 ׄ 𓍼 › ⱳеℓ𝘤оⅿе 𝕥о 𝓯ℓоо∂ ‹ « 4 𝕥ꞅее » ָ ๋࣭ — ꪦ𑄈ִ᥋ꭑ𑄈ִບ݂ั ,, ꪦყꭑн︩︪υ᜔ׂ𝕜 ! ꭖ𑄈ִчყ ꪦթυ᜔ׂટꪒ𑜅᥋υ᜔ׂꭑꪉ ꭑꫀδᦸ 𐌱𑄈ִ φꪒყꬶ ꪦ𑄈ִ ꭑ𑜅𝕜𑄈ִຕყ φ𑜅н︩︪ꬶ𑄈ִຕყ ,, 𝕜𑜅𝕜 « 𝕜𑄈ִꭑы 𐌱𑄈ִυ᜔ׂꭑꫀꪒυ᜔ׂ » ! ᥋ꫀບ݂ัч𑜅᥋ ຕы н︩︪ყжꬶ𑜅ꫀຕ᥋ᦸ 𐌱 н︩︪ꪉюᤐ𝕜𑜅ꭖ..δყꬶꫀຕ թ𑜅ꬶы 𐌱υ᜔ׂꬶꫀꭑꪉ 𝕜𑜅жꬶ𑄈ִટ𑄈ִ ! — ָ ๋࣭ ✧ 𝕥о 𝘤о𝗇𝕥⍺𝘤𝕥 𝕥𝗁е оⱳ𝗇еꞅ . . ~ [ @shh1l ] ✧ оuꞅ ⅈ𝗇𝓯о—𝘤𝗁⍺𝗇𝗇еℓ . . ~ ›› ꪒ𑜅ꪦ ! ‹‹ 𞋯ᰰ
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
I love Talking friends... Мы тоже любим!! ⊹₊˚‧︵‿₊୨ᰔ୧₊‿︵‧˚₊⊹ Talking friends conference ⊹₊˚‧︵‿₊୨ᰔ୧₊‿︵‧˚₊⊹ мы рады видеть тебя в этой конференции!!
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
໒꒰ྀི｡◞ ◟｡ྀི꒱ა 💙 ✦✧ . 🌟 ° 〢 ✦listen before I go... ...представляю вам confession+nondaily по прекрасной и неповторимой Билли Айлиш!!✧ ❌*ೃ༄ 🎵*ೃ✧˚. ❃ ↷ˊ- 💙 🎤 Билли Айлиш? Кто это? Билли Айлиш Пайрат Бэрд О’Коннелл (англ. Billie Eilish Pirate Baird O'Connell; род. 18 декабря 2001, Лос-Анджелес, Калифорния) — американская певица и автор песен. Двукратная лауреатка премии Оскар, имеет 9 Грэмми. Обрела изве…
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
——————————————— Здравствуй путник! Позволь тебе представить проект "Трансформеры: работы под прикрытием". «Трансформеры: Роботы под прикрытием» (Transformers: Robots in Disguise) — это мультсериал 2015–2017 годов, часть вселенной «Трансформеров». Он считается продолжением мультсериала «Трансформеры: Прайм». Наш канал посвящен этому проекту в форме сетки. «Сетка в ТГК» (ТГК — это «телеграм‑канал») — это нескольк…
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
😀🥹🥹🤍𝐔𝐆𝐒 🌟🍼 lover'𝑠🥹 🥹 🥹😋 🥹любишь милых, очаровательных и смешных мопсов ??..🤩🤩 🌟🥹заходи в 🥹 𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦cf🤩𝑝𝑢𝑔𝑠🐶🥹 и люби их вместе с нами !! ❤️ 🤩
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Хотите выразить слова восхищения Месси? Нарисовали арт со спортсменом, а показать негде? Вам просто хочется посмотреть на фотографии талантливого аргентинца? – Это сюда! 🖊️Дни: хейтеры Месси, агрессия по отношению к участникам кф, база 🖊️Брак с Роналду NSFW кф 🖊️Бот для тейков - @Lovemessi_bot 🖊️ВП пост 0+ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
——————————— —Блин, я не могу найти место, где шарят за этот сериал .( . — Я хочу высказать свою любовь к этому персу из drawn together! . Не знаешь где высказатся насчёт этого взрослого мультика? Тогда вам в— ..𝗗𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗻 𝗧𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻.. . Мультреалити (англ. Drawn Together — мультсериал, созданный в 2004 году Дейвом Джесером (Dave Jeser) и Мэттом Сильверштейном (Matt Silverstein) для американского телеканала Comedy…
Signed ิ︎.•︎ ≾︎「︎ℰ︎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑦」︎≳︎ ꨄ .
— искал кф по Альт Ёшке? — нету куда ещё рискнуть и показать свое творчество? — просто ищешь где можно найти картинок с Альт? ࿙ ׁ ִ◌⃘۫⟡ 🎧 ៸៸ ֺ︩ 𝇂𝇄ִ 𝆬ׄ 🎶 …
Signed Mousefur's enjoyer #1!!
Охуеь... Это мой старый артик бляяхэ, надо сделать редизайн шоли
Signed Mousefur's enjoyer #1!!
ВОТ ТАК. #арт #традиш
Signed Mousefur's enjoyer #1!!
Персонажи из сериала Сирень от StalkerROTS #StalkerROTS
🍓3🦄3🥰2🌚1
Signed Mousefur's enjoyer #1!!
Златошейка , мини Ежевика (Ежевичка) и мини Рыжинка Goldenflower , mini Brambleclaw (Bramblekit) and mini Tawnypelt(Tawnykit) #WarriorCats
❤4🥰3🔥1
Signed Mousefur's enjoyer #1!!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sixsevenura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого первее
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 116,840 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sixsevenura named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Легендарный Саратов☠️” (@sixsevenura), 29 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sixsevenura.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.