146119 【出击时间】:2026-08-09 【出击老师】: #笑笑 【评价人】:Jocelyn 人照:10 颜值:10 身材:9 服务:10 态度:10 环境:9 综合评分:9.67 过程:笑笑老师很漂亮,服务时也很会提供情绪价值,会一直跟你聊天,我倒还有点紧张放不开那样,老师就像女朋友一样一直安抚我的情绪,让我放松放开,体验感拉满。笑笑老师趴在身体上服务的时候叫的那叫一个骚啊,直接听就听硬了。最喜欢的就是老师口的时候了,一双媚眼直勾勾的盯着你,舌头在肉棒上打转,随即整根吞进嘴里,别提有多爽了。最爽的还是和老师69,老师的小骚逼摆在面前,忍不住就吸了上去,给老师舔的一阵浪叫,嘴里不停的说着“你坏死了”,就像女友般撒娇。进入正戏阶段,老师也是各种姿势来回切换,虽然是第一次,但每次撞击都让老师骚浪声不止,配合上老师的大屁股,简直妥妥的肉便器圣体!出击过的最满意的一个老师,力荐给兄弟们,无脑冲就是了! 优…

Channel
苏州大学报告厅
@szdxbgt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,211subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004287291203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szdxbgt |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szdxbgt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 3,211 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 3,208 | +17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 3,191 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 3,183 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 3,183 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.07%
- avg views ÷ 3,211 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 34.3
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 686 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
145958 【出击时间】:2026-08-09 【出击老师】: #喜多多 【评价人】:Fccc 人照:9 颜值:9 身材:9 服务:9.5 态度:9.5 环境:9 综合评分:9.17 过程:老师水磨有活动,所以跟喜老师约好时间,准点前往出击。 这是第二次出击喜老师了,所以熟悉了不少。老师的价格打折,服务一如既往的认真,水磨跟老师肉体交织,真的太爽了,毒龙和深喉也是非常棒,各种姿势抱着老师啪啪,很舒畅的一次出击。 优缺点:服务洗澡态度好 总结:推荐 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145942 【出击时间】:2026-08-09 【出击老师】: #葡萄糖 【评价人】:沉梦 人照:9 颜值:9 身材:8.8 服务:9 态度:9 环境:8.8 综合评分:8.93 过程:终于等到葡萄糖结束红休回来开课,我直接跟她约好了时间出击。 到达地方后,遥控上楼。门已经开好了,推门进去第一眼,人照无差,确实可以——绝美御姐的气质扑面而来。简单寒暄几句后,便开始脱衣陪浴。 陪浴时她绝不是简单冲洗。她把沐浴露均匀涂在我身上,然后用自己的身体紧紧贴着,缓慢而有力地来回擦拭,皮肤与皮肤之间的摩擦带着明显的热意,很有感觉。只是二弟当时已经有些战损,口腔接触时隐隐作痛,便没让她做水中箫。 随后上了床。先是趴着让她从后面舔,舌尖在身上游走,细细密密地游龙一般,舒适得让人放松。接着她来了个“猴子偷桃”,指尖在臀缝间轻划,同时吸吮着二弟,刺激直接且强烈。后来我翻身躺下,她一边舔抚我的胸口,一边任我回抚她的身体,嘴里不断…
145909 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #狗儿 【评价人】:微微一笑、很倾城 人照:8.5 颜值:9.0 身材:9.0 服务:9.5 态度:9.5 环境:9.0 综合评分:9.08 过程:细雨带风打湿了点街道,头顶的太阳依然火热,阻挡不了特种兵空降的诱惑。 1,进门观感有点御姐,身材高挑,没照片嫩,颜值佳。 2,服务三件套,值得一提口活很棒。 3, 🖊️感较紧,腿长后入顶。 优缺点:缺点🐻软一般 总结:温柔高挑,可刷 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145851 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #沫沫 【评价人】:Lucy 人照:9 颜值:9 身材:9 服务:10 态度:10 环境:10 综合评分:9.5 过程:小姐姐人很好看,性格也特别温柔,课表上的服务都有,沟通起来特别舒服。 优缺点:服务非常好,很擅长聊天 总结:性价比非常高 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145744 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #相城豆豆 【评价人】:Piao 人照:8 颜值:8 身材:8 服务:8 态度:8 环境:8 综合评分:8 过程:课室在相城某公寓,无需刷卡遥控进入,ls不遵守时间,消息回复很慢。这个减分。(本来约好13:20上课,最后靠近14:00才上课。白白在外面晒了好久。消息也回复很慢,遥控上楼,过了十分钟回复在哪个门口,到了之后过了十几分钟再回复几楼,然后到了之后过了十几分钟再回复在哪个房间。总之回消息很慢。ls说是梯子网络不好,消息延迟的理由,不知真假。ls显得很羞涩,所有的要求需要自己提出来。(坏处是被动型,好处是不拒绝,不管提啥要求都满足)。女上的话很青涩,不懂节奏,体力不支。追求服务的话不推荐,全程都是调教。有控制欲的伙伴,喜欢调教的可能冲。 优缺点:优点:年轻嫩妹,提要求都满足 缺点:不守时,回消息巨慢 总结:工兵出击还是可以 苏大…
145693 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #糖糖 【评价人】:莫 人照:8 颜值:8 身材:7 服务:8 态度:9 环境:8 综合评分:8 过程:提前约好了老师,进门看到老师,老师脸有点婴儿肥挺可爱的,我个人觉得本人比照片好看一些,坐着聊了会天,会主动给水关怀。聊了一会后两个人进入浴室洗澡,老师很主动的帮忙洗,洗完之后两个人一起躺床上,给人一种小女友的感觉,而且还很嫩,大蟒蛇,开始口,口的时候很认真 而且很努力,口了好一会之后,我和老师说可以了才开始干正事,带好之后女上起手,不得不说嫩的感觉还是不一样,好一会之后才换位置 还是个女上小马达,换了好几个姿势也很听话,而且老师声音很软糯娇滴滴的,听着让人很带感,出货后两个人又一起洗个澡结束 优缺点:嫩,听话,暂时想不到什么太大的缺点 总结:很嫩,服务态度也很好,体验感很不错,老师稍微有点肉肉但不是坦,是刚刚好的那种,喜欢特别瘦的就算了…
145600 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #小艾 【评价人】:我是小羊 给我🌿 人照:9 颜值:8.8 身材:9.5 服务:9 态度:9 环境:9.5 综合评分:9.13 过程:兑换工兵,第二天出发,排课较宽松。身材苗条,该有的都有。陪浴服务全名,全程当个道具就行,口活熟练,不说停不带停,🐍跟69都很配合。姿势都配合,不催课,很健谈。 优缺点:身材好,服务态度好 总结:老法师,推荐 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145508 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #毛毛 【评价人】:正在输入 人照:8 颜值:8 身材:8 服务:8 态度:9 环境:7 综合评分:8 过程:毛毛老师一开门就很热情 问我要不要喝水 然后我给拿拖鞋 带我去洗澡 帮我洗干净 然后上床给我按摩 AB面 口的很舒服 叫的很有感觉 很紧很肥 后面123就出击了 优缺点:有双飞,可以体验 总结:要了双飞,双飞可以 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145507 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #小夕阳 【评价人】:正在输入 人照:8 颜值:8 身材:8 服务:8 态度:9 环境:7 综合评分:8 过程:约好时间就出击了,小区,感觉是安置房,都是老头老太,进门就递上水了拿着水开门的,天太热,进门就洗澡了,课表上的都有,水中萧不错,开始服务,服务我感觉都差不多,值得一提的是口罐比一般的老师要好,吸力很强 优缺点:优点:口的比较久,会锁喉 总结:态度不错的,课表上的都有 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145504 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #米兰 【评价人】:正在输入 人照:8 颜值:8 身材:9 服务:9 态度:8 环境:9 综合评分:8.5 过程:由于工作忙忘了出击,还是校长提醒的,果断约好时间出击,约课过程很顺利,没有多余的废话,遥控上楼进门,身材算是比较高挑了,进门马上递上了水,拿过水喝了一口,拖着已经拿到脚下了,俯身放拖鞋时从上往下看了一下奶子还可以,后面摸着手感也不错,口活有一说一确实可以,口了两分钟吃不消,立马戴套冲刺,由于我不喜欢三通所以没加 优缺点:优点:口活一级棒,可以不断深喉 总结:很有耐心,喜欢服务的可以去 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
145422 【出击时间】:2026-08-08 【出击老师】: #可欣 【评价人】:小心 人照:9 颜值:9 身材:9 服务:9 态度:9 环境:9 综合评分:9 过程:环境不错,公寓,没尝试过这么多纹身,立马出击,没让我失望,还是很有性欲的,做了不少时间,老师没有一点不耐烦,很有耐心,白虎好啊,白虎要吃🤓 优缺点:身材不错,白虎,刮的很干净 总结:纹身多,我喜欢,白虎不错,下面挺紧的 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @szdxbgt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,309,050 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“苏州大学报告厅” (@szdxbgt), 3,211 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szdxbgt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.