Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сыркк

@sirkk0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

243subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223686459
TypeChannel
Username@sirkk0
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sirkk0

Growth

24313 Aug 2026, 11:17 — 243 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 16:15 — 243 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 11:1714 Aug 2026, 16:15
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 242–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:15243no change
13 Aug 2026, 11:17243first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.5%
avg views ÷ 243 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total706
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥10429.5%
💘7822.2%
🔥5214.8%
4713.4%
🍓277.67%
😭174.83%
🌚113.13%
🤯82.27%
🕊41.14%
🙏30.852%
10.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sirkk0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC60 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Балуете меня добрым словом... Вот вам кляксы

💘8🍓3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC66 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У меня к слову чёт вообще из головы вылетело, куда присылать гифты. Короче если кто-то что-то рисовал, можете тут оставить ссылочку на пост, либо прислать арт, я вам напишу чтобы забрать файлик/порепощу :'D

🍓2💘2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC70 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, с днем рождения меня?🎉 Обычно в этот день художники просят репосты, но на данный момент я буду рада просто видеть ваш актив в реактах/комментах, потому что смотреть каждый месяц на отписки, мягко говоря, заколебало. Долго думала что делать со своим творчеством, и скорее всего, временно откажусь от работы в сфере кммичек, и оставлю рисование в качестве хобби/общения. Если честно, я уже и не помню когда в посл

🌚11💘4🍓31

8 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC118 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🍓2🕊21❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Мне тут недавно написал один такой, так что на всякий я напомню:

🍓1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC127 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Друзья, на всякий напомню что у меня др 12 августа. Все кто давно хотел меня поздравить, можете заглянуть в альбом с моими дитятями и чёт почиркать, нинаю. Буду ппц как признательна, так как банально нет времени на их развитие (своим же подчерком 🥲) Ссылки оставлю в комментах.

💘14🍓1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC162 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Сижу в эмоциональной яме, так что картинок в ближайшее время пока не будет. Извините :(

22💘4🔥3🍓2🤯21

10 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC348 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Забыла выложить

❤‍🔥17💘76🍓2🔥2🤯1

10 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC292 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Моё сердце не выдержало и я купила ему корм 🥹🥹

🔥14💘3🍓1🙏1

10 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC258 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Победителю лотереи Впервые заказали кристалку, надеюсь у меня получилось🐾🐾

❤‍🔥20💘5🔥5🍓1🙏1

2 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC343 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

И гифтек прикол до кучи :з

❤‍🔥21💘54🍓2🔥2🤯1

2 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC264 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Трееейд с очень крутым бро💫 Я таки решила сделать ей белый контур

❤‍🔥22💘7🔥5🍓1🕊1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sirkk0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,147,815 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сыркк” (@sirkk0), 243 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sirkk0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.