Channel
@sirensworkspace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002454176520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sirensworkspace |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sirensworkspace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 94 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 94 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (17 September 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🤩〰️𝗁𝖾 🎀𝗲𝘀𝘁 🎀𝗂𝗌𝗍 🎀𝑓: 🎀𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗘𝗦 — 𝚁𝙿𝙱𝚁 🤩 ⋆ › 𝗔𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗮 𝗡𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗼 ⟡ @N4VARR0 › 𝗔𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗮 ⟡ @anirahq › 𝗔𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲 ⟡ @AriGUptades › 𝗕𝗮𝗱 𝗕𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆 ⟡ @inzlvidable › 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘇 𝗥𝗶𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗼 ⟡ @aphroditeupdates › 𝗕𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝗖𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘀 ⟡ @bellacampox › 𝗖𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝗖𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗼 ⟡ @yourscnews › 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗮 𝗠𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘀 ⟡ @mariespov › 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲 ⟡ @updatestorrie › 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘀𝗼𝗻 ⟡ @neveritas › 𝗘𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗚𝘂𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗿𝗮 ⟡ @emgupdates › 𝗘𝘃𝗲 𝗦𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀 ⟡ @TEAME…
Signed ࣭͘ 𝒔𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑛; 𝒂𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝒊𝑣𝑦
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ࣭͘ 𝒔𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑛; 𝒂𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝒊𝑣𝑦
ᅟᅟ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ᅟ ⌕﹐ 𝚅𝙾𝙶𝚄𝙴 𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗇𝖾 ⠀⠀ ' 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖾. 𔐼 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟻 ﹒ ﹒ ﹒ ﹒ ﹒ ﹒ 🖤𝖨𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖥𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖣𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖾𝗋, 🖤𝖨𝗏𝗒 𝖭𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 🖤𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖵𝗈𝗀𝗎𝖾. ⠀⠀ ⓘ. 𝒇𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𝗆𝖺𝗀𝗮𝘇𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝄒
Signed ࣭͘ 𝒔𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑛; 𝗶𝗏𝗒𝗻𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ࣭͘ 𝒔𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑛; 𝗶𝗏𝗒𝗻𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇
𝐈𝗏𝗒 𝖭𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝖺𝗍 #𝗩𝗠𝗔'𝘀 𝖻𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗄 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍. The look is a costume made by herself from her atelie specially for today's. Is also showing hints of her new era. ── 🖤𝖠𝗅𝗅 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗍𝗁𝗌 𝒓𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝒔𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗇.
Signed 𝒊𝘷𝘺 𝒏𝑜𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝒊𝘷𝘺 𝒏𝑜𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛
🤩88,69𝖪 🤩9,00𝖪🤩12,00 🖤𝗜𝘃𝘆𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻: 𝖲𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝖺 𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗒, 𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗎𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝗆𝗒 𝗆𝗈𝗆! #𝑠𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗌𝑥𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖾𝗋𝟤. ── 🖤𝖠𝗅𝗅 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗍𝗁𝗌 𝒓𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝒔𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗇.
Signed 𝒊𝘷𝘺 𝒏𝑜𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛.
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sirensworkspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 235,688 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sirensworkspace named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“˓ 𝗜𝘃𝘆 𝗡𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇: 𝒔𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙚 𐚁” (@sirensworkspace), 94 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sirensworkspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.