Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ســ💡ـــِرَاجُ طَــ↓↓ـــالـِبـَةِ الـعِـــ📚ــلـْم

Channel

ســ💡ـــِرَاجُ طَــ↓↓ـــالـِبـَةِ الـعِـــ📚ــلـْم

@sirajetalibatl3ilm

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

475subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001026315235
TypeChannel
Username@sirajetalibatl3ilm
Created11 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sirajetalibatl3ilm

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Assona/1224428 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC@sirajetalibatl3ilm/14905 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@Assona/1224628 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC@sirajetalibatl3ilm/14913 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@Assona/1224928 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC@sirajetalibatl3ilm/14910 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@Assona/1225028 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC@sirajetalibatl3ilm/14914 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@Assona/1225128 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC@sirajetalibatl3ilm/14906 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@Assona/1225228 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC@sirajetalibatl3ilm/14911 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Assona18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Assona (18–0)
@Yabkalathar18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Yabkalathar (14–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 32 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 28 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Assona. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4754814786 August 2026 — 481 subscribers6 August 2026 — 481 subscribers14 August 2026 — 480 subscribers23 August 2026 — 479 subscribers30 August 2026 — 478 subscribers9 September 2026 — 475 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 34 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 474–482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 11:19475-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:43478-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:33479-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:58480-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:45481no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:34481first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

6 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC8 viewsread 6 August 2026

▪️عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال : (( ما عاب النبيُّ ﷺ طعامًا قطُّ ، إنِ اشتهاه أكله ، وإن كرهه تركَه )) 📚 صحيح البخاري - رقم: (5409)

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

‏عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ: " إن في ‎#الجمعة لساعة لا يوافقها مسلم قائم يصلي يسأل الله خيرا إلا أعطاه إياه ". وقال بيده يقللها " . 📚رواه مسلم 852 يوافقها: يصادفها ويقصدها ويتحراها بالدعاء. أشار بيده يقللها: يشير إلى أنها وقت قليل

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

‏عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ : " الصلوات_الخمس، والجمعة إلى ‎#الجمعة، ورمضان إلى رمضان مكفرات ما بينهن إذا اجتنب الكبائر ". 📚رواه مسلم 233 الصلوات الخمس: المفروضة في اليوم والليلة. الجمعة: ‎#صلاة_الجمعة. رمضان: ‎#صوم_رمضان. مكفرات: ماحيات. الكبائر: الذنوب التي ورد الوعيد بالعقاب الشديد على فعلها؛ كالزنى وشرب الخمر.

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026

‏عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ : " من اغتسل ‎#يوم_الجمعة غسل الجنابة ثم راح، فكأنما قرب بدنة، ومن راح في الساعة الثانية فكأنما قرب بقرة، ومن راح في الساعة الثالثة فكأنما قرب كبشا أقرن، ومن راح في الساعة الرابعة فكأنما قرب دجاجة، ومن راح في الساعة الخامسة فكأنما قرب بيضة، فإذا خرج الإمام حضرت الملائكة يستمعون الذكر ". 📚رواه مسلم 850 الحث على الاغتسال ‎#يوم_الجمعة، ويكون قبل الذهاب إلى الصلاة. فضي…

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

❐ هذه هي السلفية ❐ قال الشيخ صالح الفوزان حفظه الله : " المقصود بالمذهب السّلفي هو ما كان عليه سلف هذه الأمة من الصحابة والتابعين والأئمة المعتبرين من الاعتقاد الصّحيح ، والمنهج السّليم ، والإيمان الصّادق، والتمسُّك بالإسلام عقيدة وشريعة وأدبًا وسلوكًا؛ خلاف ما عليه المبتدعة والمنحرفون والمخرِّفون . 🌴 ومن أبرز من دعا إلى مذهب السّلف الأئمة الأربعة، وشيخ الإسلام ابن تيميَّة ، وتلاميذه، والشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهَ…

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC8 viewsread 6 August 2026

- ✍️قال الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله: ينبغي للإنسان إذا توضأ أن يصلي ركعتين في أي وقت كان، حتى لو بعد العصر، بعد الفجر، في أي وقت ينبغي لك إذا توضأت أن تصلي ركعتين. وينبغي في هاتين الركعتين أن تحرص غاية الحرص على ألا توسوس فيهما، يعني اجعل قلبك وقالبك لصلاتك، لأن من أحسن الوضوء ثم صلى ركعتين لا يحدث فيهما نفسه، غفر له ما تقدم من ذنبه.‼️ 📚شرح رياض الصالحين(٢٥٥/٣).

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026

📌 مـا هــو الـذكـر الــوارد فـﮯ سجــود السهــو !!! ❐ للشــيخ العـلامــہ / محمـد بـن صــالح الـ؏ـثيمين ـ رحمـہ اللّـہ تـعالـﮯ : السؤال : ماذا يقول الساجد للسهو في سجوده؟ هل يقول سبحان ربي الأعلى أو يقول سبحان من لا ينسى ولا يسهو؟ وماذا يقول بين السجدتين علماً بأن سجود السهو شرع لزيادة إن نقص أو شك في الصلاة؟ الجواب : يقول في سجود السهو كما يقول في سجود الصلاة لعموم قول الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم في قوله تعال…

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC14 viewsread 6 August 2026

📌 عليك أن تسأل الله دائماً الثبات ولا تعجب بعقيدتك قال العلامة ابن عثيمين - رحمه الله 📘علىٰ الإنسان ألا يغتر بنفسه ولا يُعجب بعقيدته، بل عليه أن يسأل الله دائمًا الثبات، لأن القلب يعتريه شبهات ويعتريه شهوات، فأحيانًا يكون الإنسان مؤمنًا حقَّاً ثم يلقي الشيطان في قلبه شبهةً فيعمىٰ - والعياذ بالله - ويضل، وأحيانًا يكون الإنسان صالحًا مستقيمًا علىٰ أمر الله فيلقي الشيطان في قلبه شهوةً فيضل، ويتبع الشهوات، فالقلب الس…

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC11 viewsread 6 August 2026

⛔ الخـروج على الحاكـم بالقولـ أخطـر من الخـروج عليـه بالسيـف . • لـ فضيلة الشيخ العلامة الفقيه / صالح بن فوزان بن عبد الله الفوزان - حفظه الله ورعاه - ⤵️ الســؤال : ـــ ¤ هل الخروج على الحاكم بالقول كالخروج بالسيف سواء بسواء ؟ ¤ وما الحكم بالخروج على الحاكم ؟ ¤ وهل من يخرج على الحاكم الآن كالخوارج في عصر الصحابة ؟ ↩ الجــواب : ـــ ¤ الخروج على الحاكم بالقول قد يكون أشد من الخروج بالسيف ¤ بل الخروج بالس…

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔴 صفة الصراط والمرور عليه ✍ السؤال: أحسن الله إليكم فضيلة الشيخ. يقول هذا السائل: ما صفة الصراط عند المرور عليه؟ وهل ورد له صفة معينة؟ ✍جواب الشيخ العثيمين رحمه الله : الصراط هو جسر يوضع على النار، يعبر منه المؤمنون إلى الجنة، جعلنا الله وإياكم منهم، يمر الناس فيه على قدر أعمالهم: إما كلمح البصر، أو كالبرق، أو كالريح، أو كالفرس الجواد، أو كالإبل، ومنهم من يزحف زحفاً، ومنهم من يكردس في نار جهنم ويعذب بقدر ذنوبه. …

Signed سنرحل ويبقى الأثر

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sirajetalibatl3ilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ســ💡ـــِرَاجُ طَــ↓↓ـــالـِبـَةِ الـعِـــ📚ــلـْم” (@sirajetalibatl3ilm), 475 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sirajetalibatl3ilm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.