Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Читательница на грани...¹⁸'❤️‍🩹

@single_reader

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

115subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002152183083
TypeChannel
Username@single_reader
DescriptionПрошлое название 🤍Дебри электронных книг По вопросам: @single_reader_ox
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/single_reader

Growth

1157 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 115 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:45 — 115 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:179 Aug 2026, 05:45
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:45115no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:17115first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.6%
avg views ÷ 115 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.3
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,317
Reactions total244
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,210
Videos
207
Links
347

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545392807867584467810635.5%
custom 58686107574023004019431.4%
custom 58641541361272139264916.4%
custom 54540373812985595803010.0%
custom 5454337350404446068124.01%
custom 545398201058017831351.67%
custom 586421413252537201620.669%
custom 545440549435556439910.334%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @single_reader. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC4 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜🤩

4 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC76 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩💜💜💜💜💜 🤩🤩🤩 Это мое первое знакомство с Люсиндой Райли. И оно оказалось хорошим, хотя до идеального попадания книга все же не дотянула.. Наверное, проблема во мне. Истории, которые начинаются с детства героев и проводят читателя через всю их жизнь, редко вызывают у меня сильные эмоции. Слишком уж очевидно, что впереди будут годы недопониманий, ошибок, потерь и страданий. И «Тайная красота» как раз из таких рома

custom 58686107574023004016custom 54539280786758446784custom 58641541361272139263

3 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC76 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💜💜💜 💜💜💜 🤎🤎🤎 💜💜💜 Лёгкого Вам понедельника💜 Я тут, как всегда: новая неделя - новая книга (по крайней мере, я стараюсь укладываться в неделю - вроде получается). В этот раз мой выбор пал на сказку «Сердцецветы для охотницы». Это будет закрытие окошечка в бинго с "книга с зимним сюжетом". П.с. я же дочитала «Тайная красота», и, обещаю - отзыв постараюсь написать в самое ближайшее время.

custom 58686107574023004017custom 54539280786758446785custom 58641541361272139265

31 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC79 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 Итак, подвела я итоги своего июля. Нууу... считаю, что неплохо, если взять, что 5 книг я прочла в бумаге😉 По качеству книг - это был удачный месяц. Очень хорошие истории попались. Как прошёл Ваш месяц? Какие сокровища начитали? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 586861075740230040110custom 58641541361272139265custom 54539280786758446784

31 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC68 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54539280786758446787custom 54539820105801783135

29 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC88 views17 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54539280786758446787custom 58641541361272139265custom 58686107574023004015

26 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC101 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 586861075740230040110custom 54539280786758446786custom 58641541361272139266

25 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC105 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📖💜💜💜💜💜💜 Как вы? Как проводите выходные? Мы все-таки начали читать «Тайная красота». Мне очень нравится, как написано. Повествование прекрасное (читается легко, похожее повествование у Кристин Ханны и Кейт Мортон). Нооо.... есть одно маленькое но... их истории (выше перечисленных авторов, включая «Тайную красоту») написаны, как семейная сага. А этот жанр я не очень люблю, потому что не могу эмоционально проникнуть и

custom 58641541361272139267custom 54539280786758446785custom 58686107574023004015custom 58642141325253720162

24 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC96 views18 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Нууу, это было очень классно, если честно! Я не ожидала, что история мне настолько понравится! В ней есть и драма, и триллер, и мистика и даже местами хоррор (такие щекочущие нервишки моменты). Сам сюжет, можно сказать, удивил (хотя я ближе к середине начала задумываться в сторону развязки, все равно основную линия я не угадала - это было прям необычный поворот). Теперь я намерена прочитать (или, скорее, п

custom 545403738129855958010custom 58686107574023004016custom 54539280786758446782

23 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC89 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Всем прекрасного дня! Я тут опять к вам с новиночками на полке) Забрала ещё на прошлых выходных «Тайная красота» (эту историю мы приметили с замечательной Ириной для совместных чтений - надеюсь, что скоро приступим). Вторую книжечку «Господин прокурор» я выиграла в розыгрыше у ещё одной прекрасной Ирины. И так совпало, что это получился также подарочком на мой день рождение✨ Спасибо огромное, И

custom 58686107574023004018custom 54539280786758446784custom 58641541361272139262

20 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC90 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💗💗💗💗💗💗 Ну что сказать? Книга оказалась неплохой. Я в принципе люблю женские триллеры, поэтому я прослушала эту историю с удовольствием. На самом деле, это тот случай, когда не стоит делать выводы по первым главам. Сначало может показаться, что эта история про женщину, мечтающую занять чужое место, но постепенно сюжет раскрывается совсем с другой стороны.... Да, меня завлекло именно то, что этот триллер сравнили с

custom 545392807867584467811custom 58641541361272139265custom 58686107574023004015

20 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC78 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🤍🤍🤍🤍 Новая неделя - новая книга) Я решила свой рабочий понедельник начать с книги «Скрытые картинки». Честно, мельком я поглядела на рисуночки и пока не особо поняла их связь (хотя, чем ближе к финалу, тем чётче картинки и более понятнее). В общем, буду читать и разбираться! Отзыв на «Последнюю миссис Пэрриш» я постараюсь написать к вечеру. Вам желаю лёгкого понедельника!😉

custom 545392807867584467811custom 58686107574023004015custom 54544054943555643991

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @single_reader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Читательница на грани...¹⁸'❤️‍🩹” (@single_reader), 115 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/single_reader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.