Jest tu ktoś ???
❤10

Channel
@singiel12
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
608subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002235399613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @singiel12 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/singiel12 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 608 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 609 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 616 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 617 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 618 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 618 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 50.7% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 31.0% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 15.5% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Jest tu ktoś ???
❤10
Photo, posted without a caption
Betclic. Ostatnie 5 meczów bezpośrednich to przynajmniej 30 fauli. Sędzia raczej overowy. Średnie dla drużyn rosną dla Lille w meczach domowych, a dla Lens w przypadku meczów wyjazdowych. Na Superbet linie wyższe o 2 faule z podatkiem! #jakogracbuka
👍3❤1
Betclic bez podatku. Barcelona to druga najrzadziej faulująca drużyna ligi. Osasuna to najrzadziej faulowana ekipa. W pierwszym meczu bezpośrednim tego sezonu Barca faulowała 3 razy. #jakogracbuka
👍3
Polska - Litwa: Choć będzie na boisku widoczna piłkarska przewaga po stronie Polski, pójdę tu w over. Sędziuję Sidiropoulos, który na 23 mecze w tym roku 21 skończył powyżej linii 3,5 kartek. I 2/2 mecze reprezentacji. Jeśli chodzi o naszą reprezentację - 5/6 powyżej linii w Lidze Narodów. Litwa - 6/6. Wg mnie warto.
Łatwo ✅
Betclic bez podatku. Tylko trzy drużyny zostały już w walce o mistrzostwo Polski, z czego dwie mierzą się ze sobą w tym meczu. W pierwszym meczu bezpośrednim obejrzeliśmy aż 30 fauli. Jaga fauluje średnio 11,6 razy na mecz, ale w rundzie wiosennej znacznie więcej. Jest faulowana 14,6 razy. Lech fauluje i jest faulowany 12,5 razy na mecz. Sędzia ten sam co w rundzie jesiennej - overowy Stefański. Stawka meczu jest wys…
👍4
Łatwo ✅
❤5
Liverpool - PSG: Liverpool fauluje w CL 10,3 razy, a wywalcza tylko 8,4 fauli przeciwnika. PSG fauluje średnio 8,9 razy, przeciwnicy faulują 9,7 razy. Ale nie to jest nawet najważniejsze. Jest żelazna zasada, że drużyna więcej fauluje, kiedy broni prowadzenia, a Liverpool broni 1:0 cudem wywiezionego z Parc de Princes. W pierwszym meczu w faulach było 7:3 dla Live. Na innych bukach widziałem kursy 1.45, więc na …
❤2👍1
Solo - Betclic, ako - Betfan Motor fauluje 11,4 razy na mecz. Puszcza wywalcza średnio 10,2 przewinienia. Arbitrem Kochanek, który to wyrasta na największego underowca ligi. Sędziował 3 mecze Motoru (8, 9, 8 fauli) oraz 2 mecze Puszczy (10, 8 fauli przeciwnika). W pierwszym meczu bezpośrednim 12 fauli Motora. #jakogracbuka
👍3👏1
Dziś ustrzelony bardzo atrakcyjny kurs na grupie Premium 🏦
Chelsea fauluje średnio 12 razy na mecz. W meczach domowych średnia rośnie do 12,3. Southampton wywalcza 11,9 przewinień na mecz. Na wyjazdach - 12,4. Sędziuje bardzo overowy, jak na wyspiarza, Bramall - średnio około 24 faule na mecz. Sędziował w tym roku 1 spotkanie Southampton, w którym rywale faulowali 14 razy. W pierwszym meczu bezpośrednim tego sezonu Chelsea miała 15 przewinień. Chelsea zalicza obecnie serię 3…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @singiel12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Czy udało Ci się zarobić z kanałem Typolog?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Czy udało Ci się zarobić z kanałem Typolog?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2025 to 11 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Typolog” (@singiel12), 608 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/singiel12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.