Channel
@sindrom_psyhologa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002183653725 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sindrom_psyhologa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sindrom_psyhologa |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 35 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 36 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 39.0% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 37.7% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
То чувство, когда в ЯндексМузыка ваш подкаст обрёл 50 слушателей♥️ А мы уже готовимся к записи второго сезона, много чего хотелось бы обсудить. Ваши темы тоже готовы рассмотреть)
👏4❤1
Signed Elena Petrik
У нас в гостях побывала нутрициолог, health-коуч Анастасия Оптинская🥰 Тема была задана «Что поесть психологу, что бы мозги хорошо соображали» 🫐➕🌰 🟰🗿 В выпуске много прикладной пользы❤️ С заботушкой о физическом состоянии психологов🫂 🫐 Подписаться на канал Анастасии можно тут 🎧Прослушать эпизод на Яндекс тут 🔘 Выбрать другую платформу для прослушивания тут
❤3
Signed Elena Petrik
Что помогает вам восполнять ментальные и физические ресурсы, коллеги❓ Психологу важно вовремя чекнуть базу заботы о себе. У вас есть особые способы восстановления? Делитесь в комментариях :)
The shares total 460%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Elena Petrik
Вчера Андрей пошутил, что у него целый список собрался того, КАК НЕ НАДО ДЕЛАТЬ ПСИХОЛОГУ😀Естественно, из личного опыта. Мы посмеялись и признали, что у каждого из нас в практике есть то, что с одной стороны можно назвать ошибками, а с другой стороны, как говорится, «пока сам себе лоб не расшибешь, не поймешь» ⁉️Внимание, вопрос😀 Хотим собрать ваши ответы, что бы использовать их в записи следующего эпизода! КАК ТО…
🔥2
Signed Elena Petrik
Сегодня записывали для вас подкаст с Андреем Высоцким про ведение психологических групп 🙂
❤2😁1
Signed Любовь Чернова
СИНДРОМ ПСИХОЛОГА pinned «💜 Где еще можно нас послушать? Теперь удобнее 🙂 Яндекс Apple Podcast Литрес Tg Player Castbox Overcast Pca»
🎧🔥 20 - минутный эпизод «Нормально ли, если психолог матерится?» уже на всех платформах. Похихикали, а тема таки любопытная.) Забавного вам прослушивания🫶🏻
🔥5
Signed Elena Petrik
Скоро выйдет эпизод на тему «Нормально ли, если психолог матерится при клиенте?» А как вы считаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Elena Petrik
Как ваше состояние по весне, коллеги?🪴
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
Signed Elena Petrik
Как психологу не бояться проявляться в соц.сетях? Обсуждаем в новом выпуске 🎧 Слушать в Яндекс музыка Выбрать другую платформу *новые эпизоды выходят раз в две недели по четвергам
❤3👏2
Signed Elena Petrik
🤪 Внимание!! КРИНЖ Коллеги, мы готовим выпуск про такие себе странные и смешные ситуации позора из практики, учебы, стажировки, начала вашей работы психологом. Если вы готовы поделиться в личку) С сохранением конфиденциальности и этики, разумеется Мы это зачитаем и обсудим вас (шутка) 👉Будет полезно для тех, кто еще пока не прошел боевое крещение и не знает, как себя вести в подобной оказии. Или тем, кто застрял …
🔥6
Signed Любовь Чернова
К нам на запись приходила гостья и сказала, что заметила, что кпт психологи часто одеты в худи) её психолог в том числе)) мы сказали, что это всего лишь совпадение))) 😀 Вот и думай теперь, что это за явление такое в кпт среде))
😁6💯1
Signed Elena Petrik
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sindrom_psyhologa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что помогает вам восполнять ментальные и физические ресурсы, коллеги❓ Психологу важно вовремя чекнуть базу заботы о себе. У вас есть особые способы восстановления? Делитесь в комментариях :)
The shares total 460%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Скоро выйдет эпизод на тему «Нормально ли, если психолог матерится при клиенте?» А как вы считаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как ваше состояние по весне, коллеги?🪴
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Нужен мастермайнд? (Описание выше)
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 1 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СИНДРОМ ПСИХОЛОГА” (@sindrom_psyhologa), 35 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sindrom_psyhologa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.