2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–79 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 19:46
78
no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:30
78
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.6%
avg views ÷ 78 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (27 February 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
41
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
31
Videos
1
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13
46.4%
🔥
11
39.3%
👍
3
10.7%
👏
1
3.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏖 TORNEM AL SETEMBRE!
Ens agafem un descans per recuperar forces, després d'un curs ple de victòries i aprenentatges.
Les assemblees tornen el dimecres 9 de setembre, al Casal Popular 3 Voltes Rebel a la mateixa hora de sempre: 18 h. Si vens per primer cop, arriba a les 17.30 h i estarem encantats de donar-te la benvinguda al moviment per l'habitatge!
Fem una pausa, però no marxem lluny. Els grups de treball conti…
✊🏽LA DUNIA ES QUEDA LA BARRI!
El pròxim 30 de juny us necessitem a Roquetes per aturar el desnonament de la Dunia. El fons voltor Promontoria Coliseum SL, que pertany a Cerberus, la vol fer fora de la casa on han nascut els 3 infants de la família. La propietat es nega a negociar i no donen cap alternativa. No podem permetre que una empresa amb centenars de milers de pisos deixin al carrer a aquesta família que fa mé…
🫵 GRAN ACTE CENTRAL 6J
Aquest dissabte 6 de juny després de la macroenquesta que farem més de 1.500 voluntàries, ens unim en un acte final per anunciar-ne els resultats i els següents passos d'aquest cicle de lluites que està desbordant el país sencer!
Perquè ja n'hi ha prou: ni salaris per terra ni habitatge pels núvols. Caminem juntes cap a la vaga general!
🗓 Dissabte 6 de juny
⏰ 18:30H
📍 Pl. de Can Fabra (Sant …
🗣 El pròxim 6 Juny sortirem a tota Catalunya per conèixer què pensa la gent sobre els lloguers i els salaris. Volem saber si estem disposades a una vaga general.
🔴 A Nou Barris, el 6 de juny ens trobarem a les 11.00 h a la Plaça Ángel Pestaña
🔥 Ni salaris per terra ni habitatge pels núvols. Cap a la vaga general!
🛜 Apunta't i participa: enscostalavida.org!
🚨 DILLUNS 2n DESNONAMENT DE LA NOREEN
Després de parar el primer desnonament, la gran tenidora Caterina Perellón segueix sense voler negociar. No es preocupa per les condicions del pis, però si de guanyar diners a costa de veïnes de tota la vida.
Si no plantem cara contra l'especulació... ens podria acabar passant a qualsevol de nosaltres.
Han demanat dispositius de mossus, hem de ser moltes i demostrar un cop més…
🔥 DESNONAMENT ATURAT: DILLUNS 1/06 NECESSITEM SER MOLTES! 🔥
Gràcies al fet què avui erem moltes i no hi havien efectius suficients, s’ha pogut aturar el desnonament. El dilluns hem de ser moltes més per demostrar que del barri no marxa ningú i que la Noreen està acompanyada i organitzada!
Moltes gràcies a totes pel suport i la força avui, no solament hem aturat el de Noreen, també el de l’Ana ✊🏽 Força Sindicats!
👀…
⚠️*ALERTA BRIMO*⚠️
La propietat es nega a donar un temps més per la Noreen i amenacen en convocar mossos.
Necessitem ser moltes *ARA MATEIX a c/ travau, 30*.
Actualització: 13:37
El Sindicat d'Habitatge de Nou Barris 💪🏿🦊
🚨 HORA CONFIRMADA! DEMÀ ATURAREM EL DESNONAMENT DE LA NOREEN
Després de més de 14 anys vivint en el Turó de la Peira, la rendista Caterina Perellón González, que viu a Mallorca i té més pisos en condicions que ni coneix ni l’importa, vol desnonar a Noreen.
Volem que la Noreen i la seva família es quedin al barri! Prou jugar amb les nostres vides! 🔥
☕️ Veniu a les 11.30h a esmorzar amb les veïnes i escalfar motors
…
🚨 LA NOREEN ES QUEDA AL BARRI I ELS SEUS FILLS A L’ESCOLA!
Després de més de 14 anys vivint en el Turó de la Peira, la rendista Caterina Perellón González, vol desnonar a Noreen.
Pero no està sola: té tot el suport comunitari de la xarxa veïnal i el 28 aturarem el desnonament.
🗓️ Dijous 28 de maig
🕒 Hora per confirmar
📍C/Travau, 30 <M> Vilapicina
👀 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYoYxEjop4m/?igsh=b245YXFnMHZ5Z3V4
🚨 ALERTA DESNONAMENT
Després de més de 14 anys vivint en el Turó de la Peira, la rendista Caterina Perellón González, que viu a Mallorca i té més pisos en condicions que ni coneix ni l'importa, vol desnonar a Noreen.
Volem que la Noreen i la seva família es quedin al barri! Prou jugar amb les nostres vides! Fora especuladors de Nou Barris🔥
🗓️ Dijous 28 de maig
🕒 Hora per confirmar
📍C/Travau, 30 <M> Vilapicina
👉🏼…
🟢 DESNONAMENT ATURAT, LA VANESA ES QUEDA!
Portem una setmana intensa d'accions a l'IMHAB perquè aturèssin el desnonament.
Finalment, han cedit davant la pressió i l'organització de les companyes. Continuarem fins aconsseguir un alquiler social perquè pugui viure tranquil·la i amb dignitat amb el seu fill en la seva llar des de fa més de més de 5 anys.
Lluitar i organitzar-se juntes, serveix!
Reel 👀 https://www.in…
DESNONAMENT SUSPÈS! ✊🏼⚠️
El desnonament de la Mari i la seva família d'aquest dimecres 13 de maig s'ha suspès temporalment gràcies a tota l'organització i suport veïnal. Però açò no acaba aquí, continuarem lluitant perquè es puguin quedar en la seva casa!
Roquetes no se vende, Roquetes se defiende! 🔥
❤3🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sindicat9b. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 322,170 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
9
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
9
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sindicat9b named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@avvroquetes named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@avvverudm named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@cjguineueta named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@espai3ulls named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@grupnyn named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@ie_trinitatnova named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@lamasiadelaguineueta named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@placomunitari named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@tictac named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sindicat d’Habitatge de Nou Barris” (@sindicat9b), 78 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sindicat9b.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.