Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

راهکارهای منابع انسانی سیمرغ

@simorgh34000

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,684subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001331725154
TypeChannel
Username@simorgh34000
Descriptionسیستم‌های منابع انسانی سیمرغ سیمرغ، تنها توسعه‌دهنده‌ی نرم‌افزارهای تخصصی بر اساس استاندارد ۳۴۰۰۰ در ایران و مورد تایید متخصصین منابع انسانی است. آیدی پشتیبانی @assist_simorgh کانال داستان موفقیت مشتریان سیمرغ @Simorgh_SuccessStories
Created29 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/simorgh34000

Growth

5,6575,6845,670.56 August 2026 — 5,657 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,657 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,667 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,684 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,653–5,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:225,684+17
8 Aug 2026, 23:145,667+10
6 Aug 2026, 03:345,657no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:035,657first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.7%
avg views ÷ 5,684 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,960
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total15,858
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
193
Videos
43
Links
226

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9256.1%
👍4326.2%
👏2012.2%
🙏95.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC918 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

با توجه به درخواست‌های شما همراهان عزیز، فایل ارائه و اکسل کاربردی وبینار «راهکار عدالت در پرداخت 4P» آماده دریافت است. 👇 📄 دانلود فایل ارائه وبینار 📊 دانلود فایل اکسل 4P

7

29 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,300 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

همراهان عزیز سیمرغ، ویدیوی کامل وبینار «راهکار عدالت در پرداخت 4P» در آپارات منتشر شده و اکنون در دسترس شماست. 🔗برای مشاهده ویدیو، اینجا کلیک کنید.

7👍2🙏2

19 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC≈2,140 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔸 داستان موفقیت رامک: پیوند جبران خدمات با عملکرد و ارزش‌آفرینی کارکنان 🔹 این داستان موفقیت از زبان آقای احمدرضا فاضل، معاونت سرمایه انسانی شرکت رامک، روایت می‌شود. 🔹 در شرایطی که جذب و نگهداشت نیروهای شایسته به یکی از چالش‌های اصلی سازمان‌ها تبدیل شده است، شرکت‌ها نیاز دارند نظام‌های جبران خدمات خود را به‌گونه‌ای طراحی کنند که علاوه بر عدالت، مسیر رشد و انگیزه کارکنان را نیز تقویت کند. 🔹 یکی از چالش‌های مهم رامک،

7👍2👏1

15 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC≈11,500 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔹وبینار راهکار عدالت در پرداخت 4P چارچوبی برای پرداخت عادلانه و شفاف سرفصل‌های وبینار: ⁃ ریشه‌های احساس بی‌عدالتی در پرداخت، میان کارکنان ⁃ ضعف روش‌های فعلی تعیین حقوق و کارانه کارکنان ⁃ آشنایی با چهار مؤلفه مدل حقوق و دستمزد 4P ⁃ ایجاد ارتباط میان شغل، شایستگی، عملکرد و پرداخت ⁃ برقراری عدالت درونی و بیرونی ⁃ مسیر اجرایی استقرار نظام جبران خدمات 4P ⁃ تجربه‌های واقعی پیاده‌سازی در سازمان‌ها مخاطبین: ⁃ متخصصین منابع

6🙏3👏1

13 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,160 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

این پکیج ارزشمند را از دست ندهید. یک فرصت بسیار مناسب برای آشنایی با مدل حقوق و دستمزد 4P، در جهت پیاده‌سازی نظام جبران خدمات عادلانه و شفاف در سازمانتان آنچه در این پکیج به‌صورت رایگان دریافت می‌کنید: 🔹 وبینار تشریح مدل جبران خدمات 4P 🔹 اکسل محاسبه حقوق و دستمزد 4P 🔹 دسترسی به پنل سنجش نگرش کارکنان 🔹 پروپوزال آشنایی با راهکار عدالت در پرداخت 4P 🔹 پروپوزال آشنایی با مدل ۳۴۰۰۰ منابع انسانی 🔹 دریافت مشاوره تخصصی رایگ

7👏2🙏1

12 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,900 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

از نارضایتی کارکنان تا عدالت در پرداخت 🔸در پست‌های اخیر متوجه شدیم، عدالت در پرداخت تنها با افزایش حقوق شکل نمی‌گیرد؛ بلکه با استقرار یک نظام حقوق و دستمزد عادلانه و شفاف همچون مدل 4P ایجاد می‌شود. 🎁 در همین راستا، پکیج آموزشی آشنایی با راهکار عدالت در پرداخت 4P را آماده کرده‌ایم که فردا در اختیار شما قرار خواهد گرفت. با ما همراه باشید... سیمرغ، تعالی انسان در سازمان🌱 ©️ | @simorgh34000 🌐 | simorgh34000.com

3👍2🙏1

9 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,960 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔻 تجربه اصلاح مدل حقوق و دستمزد شرکت فرمند با پیاده‌سازی مدل 4P سیمرغ 🔹این داستان موفقیت، از زبان خانم دکتر میترا سامانی (معاون منابع انسانی شرکت فرمند) روایت می‌شود. 🔹شرکت صنایع غذایی فرمند، یکی از بزرگ‌ترین تولیدکنندگان شیرینی و شکلات در ایران، با هدف ارتقای فرآیندهای منابع انسانی و اصلاح نظام پرداختی، اقدام به پیاده‌سازی مدل حقوق و دستمزد 4P سیمرغ کرد. 🔹در ابتدای مسیر، چالش‌هایی مانند نبود نظام پرداخت منصفانه و

👏54👍2

8 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,460 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔍 بر اساس نظرسنجی انجام‌شده، بیشترین سهم مربوط به طرح طبقه‌بندی مشاغل و پس از آن تصمیم مدیریتی/توافقی بوده است. این نتایج نشان می‌دهد در بسیاری از سازمان‌ها، تعیین حقوق همچنان ترکیبی از روش‌های سنتی، تصمیم‌های موردی و مدل‌های محدود ساختاریافته است؛ در حالی که برای ایجاد یک نظام جبران خدمات عادلانه، شفاف و قابل دفاع، نیاز به مدلی جامع وجود دارد که ارزش شغل، شایستگی فرد، عملکرد و نقش‌آفرینی کارکنان را هم‌زمان در نظر ب

6👍5

8 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,370 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

نظام پرداخت در سازمان شما بر پایه کدام مدل پیاده‌سازی شده است؟

  1. طرح طبقه‌بندی مشاغل38%
  2. مدل حقوق و دستمزد 4P15%
  3. تصمیم مدیریتی/توافقی35%
  4. هیچ کدام12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,720 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ مدل 4P؛ راهکاری برای ایجاد عدالت در پرداخت 🔸همان‌طور که در پست‌های قبل اشاره کردیم، نارضایتی از حقوق همیشه به معنای پایین بودن عدد حقوق نیست. گاهی مسئله این است که کارکنان نمی‌دانند پرداخت‌ها بر اساس چه منطقی تعیین شده است. 🔸در چنین شرایطی، افزایش حقوق شاید موقتاً تنش را کم کند؛ اما تا زمانی که منطق پرداخت شفاف نباشد، احساس بی‌عدالتی دوباره بازمی‌گردد. راهکار پایدار، استقرار یک نظام حقوق و دستمزد عادلانه، شفاف و

6👍3👏1

4 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,390 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ نظام جبران خدمات؛ اولین خط دفاع در برابر خروج کارکنان 🔸میانگین نرخ خروج داوطلبانه کارکنان در آمریکا طی سال‌های ۲۰۲۴ تا ۲۰۲۵، حدود ۱۳٪ گزارش شده است (mercer 2025)؛ در حالی‌که در بسیاری از صنایع، نرخ خروج تک‌رقمی یا نزدیک به ۱۰٪ معمولا نشانه وضعیت مطلوب‌تر نگهداشت است. 🔸اما سؤال اصلی اینجاست: چه عواملی می‌توانند از خروج کارکنان جلوگیری کنند؟ طبق گزارش Gallup 2024، حدود ۴۲٪ از خروج‌های داوطلبانه قابل پیشگیری بوده‌ا

6👍1👏1

1 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,660 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

رضایت کارکنان را حدس نزنید، اندازه‌گیری کنید. 🔸در بسیاری از سازمان‌ها، اقدامات مختلفی در حوزه منابع انسانی انجام می‌شود؛ اما همیشه مشخص نیست این اقدامات تا چه اندازه بر نگرش، رضایت و تعهد کارکنان اثر گذاشته‌اند. پنل سنجش نگرش کارکنان سیمرغ به شما کمک می‌کند تصویر دقیق‌تری از وضعیت واقعی کارکنان داشته باشید. 🔸نرم‌افزار سنجش نگرش کارکنان سیمرغ، شاخص‌هایی مثل رضایت شغلی، رضایت از مافوق، رضایت از حقوق، رضایت از همکاران

3🙏2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @simorgh34000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTCAnonymous Poll208 voters

نظام پرداخت در سازمان شما بر پایه کدام مدل پیاده‌سازی شده است؟

  1. طرح طبقه‌بندی مشاغل38%
  2. مدل حقوق و دستمزد 4P15%
  3. تصمیم مدیریتی/توافقی35%
  4. هیچ کدام12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTCAnonymous Poll206 voters

آیا در سازمان شما، کارکنان احساس می‌کنند حقوق و مزایایشان عادلانه تعیین شده است؟

  1. بله13%
  2. خیر68%
  3. تا حدودی19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,396 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“راهکارهای منابع انسانی سیمرغ” (@simorgh34000), 5,684 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simorgh34000.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.