Channel
@signals_slayer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
441subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001436907930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @signals_slayer |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/signals_slayer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 441 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 445 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 447 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 447 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2023 to 9 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ช่วงนี้แอดจะไม่ได้แชร์ คอนเทนต์ลงช่องน้า แต่ยังมาพูดคุยกันได้ครับ 🚨🚨 ย้ำอีกรอบนะครับ 🚨🚨 ตอนนี้แอดมินได้เปิด Community สำหรับพูดคุยแลกเปลี่ยน ทั้งด้าน TA FA เกี่ยวกับ Crypto แล้วนะครับสามารถเข้าผ่าน t.me/joinchat/FfXF9WNErkw1Yzll ได้เลย
❤2
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
#Charts CRV - Still long still valid. I want to see the series of LH break which is looking likely for now. https://www.tradingview.com/x/t3jQbYXN/
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
when this coin reached May2022 level, CZ listed it into Futures lmao #RNDR new listing in Futures
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
this is futures chart.
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
🐦 #Birb | #OfficialCalls - #JayTrader CALL TITLE UNI/USDT Breakout Trade CALL TECHNICAL EXPLANATION Exchange tokens are breaking out and there was good news today that the Coinbase lawsuit was dropped. This might cause more funds to flow into both centralized and decentralized exchanges. This is one of my favourite types of patterns on UNI. Stop is necessarily wide, so use appropriate entries/size. CALL STRUCTURE …
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
This neutral-red Funding rates matrix looks scary for bulls. Remember that we are not in global bull cycle, thus red funding is a warning! free content by @kimoncrypto
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
📌The yellow line indicates where the majority of longs opened up. These longs are now underwater ( in loss ). The bulls will need to break $24K to be in profit free content by @cyberdavid
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
COCOS /USDT (Binance) BUY : 0.610-0.660 CMP- 0.659 Target:0.693-0.725-0.800-🔥🚀 Sl - -7% Chart looking good.. buy and hold
👍1
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
INSIDER UPDATE 90% of Hong Kong and Singapore's wealthiest investors say they will buy or already own #bitcoin and digital assets. New research report by one of the 'Big Four' accounting organizations in the world, KPMG: ➖➖➖➖➖ Bitcoin Bullets® Trading
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
It is interesting here that BTC at CME chart is not going too high from MA200. BTC is just consolidating above MA200 like other altcoins.
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
🥇 $BTC UPDATE : BTC is now at important EMA support area in low time frame and must reclaim 23300$ area for further upside move otherwise we can sweep previous HL 22200$ area. Once reclaim 23300$ zone, we will pump hard upto 24-25k$. Don't be overexposed in leverage since there are many upcoming events :)
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
#BTC_Update An interesting fact is that CME institutionals have almost completely closed all their short positions and continue to accumulate longs.
Signed SUPPORT (Never PM you first)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @signals_slayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,535 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@signals_slayer named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Signals Slayer” (@signals_slayer), 441 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signals_slayer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.