Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Роздуте его Антона Соколова

Channel

Роздуте его Антона Соколова

@sidsego

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

194subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001111219842
TypeChannel
Username@sidsego
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 June 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sidsego

Growth

1921941937 August 2026 — 192 subscribers8 August 2026 — 192 subscribers24 August 2026 — 194 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 15:17194+2
8 Aug 2026, 11:50192no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:30192first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5438.6%
😁4129.3%
🤝139.29%
👍117.86%
😢85.71%
🔥64.29%
👏42.86%
😱21.43%
👌10.714%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sidsego. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 January 2026 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC304 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ні дня, щоб русня у нас щось не спизд… а, стоп!..

😱21

17 May 2026, 17:34 UTC290 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Валерія Михайлова пробує запустити свій формат — біологічні факти з жартами та мемами вперемішку. Гляньте, лайкніть, і привітайте її в коментах з ДН! https://youtu.be/NKu3Z7v53Zk?si=x5nvzpy1atF1QvUt

5👍1

15 May 2026, 13:36 UTC263 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Історія про мою найневдалішу інвестицію в житті. 1999 рік, 3-й клас. Всі грають в фішки (якщо ви не з Дніпра, то можливо вам вони відомі як кепси). В ходу три основні серії: мортал комбат, покемони та еротичні фішки. Еротичні були інтерактивними: купальники на жінках ставали прозорими, якщо іх намочити. Ми їх лизали. І фішок мені завжди катастрофічно не вистачало. Тому одного дня я вирішив взяти гроші, що мені дава

😁20🔥5

26 Mar 2026, 14:31 UTC298 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Як дизайнеру, іноді мені доводиться працювати на базі доробок попередніх дизайнерів, щось переробляти, шукати новий стиль тощо. І от переробляти за криворукими дизайнерами мені подобається набагато більше, аніж за нормальними. Бо коли хтось робив криво, то ти трошки щось зробив, поставив шрифти нормальні, а не ублюдські, фото не переекспонував — і все, вже виглядає гарно. А після хорошого дизайнера сидиш думаєш, як

13👌1😁1

11 Mar 2026, 13:47 UTC373 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всі, звісно, памʼятають переможний* танець Вінсента Веги та Мії Уоллес з Кримінального чтива. Але чи звертали увагу на його шкарпетки? Вінсент носить чорні гафровані Gold Toe, з характерною світлою вставкою в районі пальців. Я дивився цей фільм разів 20 (без перебільшення). І перші разів 12 я його дивився на старому радянському телевізорі, з відповідною якістю зображення, що забезпечувала поламана дециметрова антен

6

11 Feb 2026, 15:25 UTC358 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Дубляж вбиває кіно. Навіть найакуратніший і найдбайливіший усе одно втрачає багато від оригіналу. Простий приклад — Одного разу в Голлівуді. Весь фільм Квентін Тарантіно побудованій на любові до 60-х і фінал – це терапевтична насильницька помста над тими, хто "вбив" безтурботні 60-ті. Не просто покарати сектантів, а зняти з них ореол жаху, зробити їх жалюгідними. Весь фільм паралельно з сюжетом Далтона та Кліфа нам

👍8

1 Feb 2026, 10:34 UTC326 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нафіга вигадувати щось нове? Просто постиш історію десятирічної давності, і кажеш що то не Брістоль, а Україна і все — маєш купу лайків. Так і з анекдотами — спостерігаю, як з них пилюку струшують і несуть в ютуб на розмовні формати

😢71🤝1

25 Jan 2026, 08:35 UTC368 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я знову з рекомендацією. Цього разу — норвезька чорна комедія «Поїздка». В цьому жанрі дуже нечасто трапляється щось достойне, але тут прям скарб. Фільм, який не тримає глядача за ідіота. За відчуттям — як «кривавий четвер», змішаний із «вбивчими канікулами», але без американської манери все проговорювати.

5

22 Jan 2026, 09:16 UTC321 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А ще, за останній рік це перший серіал на Нетфліксі, серед тих, що дивився, де немає персонажів геїв. Трохи незвично🙄

2

22 Jan 2026, 07:45 UTC306 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Маю для вас рекомендацію — серіал на Нетфліксі «Хлопʼя поглинає всесвіт» (Boy swallows universe). Австралійська історія, заснована на напів-автобіографічному романі Трента Далтона: про дитинство в сімʼї, де мати — наркозалежна, вітчим — дилер, батько — алкоголік, старший брат не розмовляє з 8 років, а найближчий друг — колишній вʼязень, який сидів за вбивство. Але це не серіал про хтонь. Тут, несподівано, багато лю

6

19 Jan 2026, 16:35 UTC251 viewsread 8 August 2026

Кому цікаво, Фелікс трошки розписав стан стендап індустрії в Україні. Коротко, але по суті все так і є

17 Jan 2026, 18:35 UTC312 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Якщо робиш контент для гівноїдів, то можна і казино рекламувати — тобі ніхто слова не скаже.

7🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sidsego. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 411,117 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Роздуте его Антона Соколова” (@sidsego), 194 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sidsego.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.