Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 50 days, net +192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39–289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 11:00
260
+15
12 Sept 2026, 18:21
245
+9
4 Sept 2026, 10:57
236
+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:42
234
+139
20 Aug 2026, 06:22
95
+17
14 Aug 2026, 07:06
78
+10
10 Aug 2026, 00:32
68
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:52
68
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 27 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
33
36.7%
❤
20
22.2%
👍
11
12.2%
❤🔥
5
5.56%
💋
4
4.44%
🤝
4
4.44%
✍
3
3.33%
💯
3
3.33%
🍓
2
2.22%
😍
2
2.22%
⚡
1
1.11%
👏
1
1.11%
👾
1
1.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 7 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sid_vanya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2025 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Про AI
Последние несколько лет я активно наблюдаю за AI-сферой.
И всё чаще замечаю, что большая часть информации, которую форсят в интернете, либо плохо применима на практике, либо является бредом ради маркетинга и привлечения внимания.
Раньше во многих задачах главным было уметь хорошо делать всё руками: писать тексты, считать, искать информацию, оформлять презентации, проверять, писать код, составлять сметы и та…
Телефон
В среднем человек проведет смотря в телефоном 9-15 лет своей жизни (в зависимости от поколения)
Это сравнимо со школьными годами и даже может превышать их.
За это время можно построить карьеру, побывать в куче стран, да и в целом стать профи практически в любом деле.
Я озадачился этим вопросом, когда заметил, что провожу в телефоне 2-3 часа в день и с трудом могу вспомнить, что я вообще там смотрел.
Настоль…
Однажды я летел из Москвы в Питер и слушал книгу Генри Форда «Моя жизнь, мои достижения».
Она о том, как Форд построил систему массового производства и управления. Но одна мысль из книги подтолкнула меня к сильнейшим размышлениям:
📰I cannot say that it was hard work. No work with interest is ever hard. I always am certain of results. They always come if you work hard enough.
📰Не могу сказать, что это была тяжёлая …
Мой опыт гонки за успешным успехом
🎬На днях посмотрел подкаст с Брайном Джонсоном и Джесси Джеймсом — и еще раз убедился: баланс важнее любой крайности, даже если речь о спорте и здоровье.
Для себя выделил несколько вещей, с которыми регулярно сталкиваюсь сам:
- Джесси рассказал, как экстремальный бодибилдинг и вечные “сушки” довели его гормоны до критических значений. Только отказ от гонки за формой, нормальный со…
Зачем я тренируюсь в жилете-утяжелителе?
Думаю, каждый слышал о пользе силовых тренировок и что важно иметь хорошую мышечную массу, но не у всех есть время регулярно заниматься в зале.
💀 Немного о грустном
Есть такое заболевание - саркопения. Это возрастная утрата мышечной массы. Обычно она начинается у людей после 30 лет и стремительно ускоряется после 60.
Если ничего с этим не делать, то сильно возрастает риск см…
Как продлить жизнь на 5+ лет или что такое VO₂ max?
Последние полгода я активно занимаюсь различными видами кардионагрузок (бокс, бег, скакалка и т.д)
Всю жизнь у меня были проблемы с интенсивными нагрузками и слабая выносливость. Я занимался боксом в детстве, потом пробовал бегать, когда был в колледже, но меня хватало не больше, чем на несколько месяцев, тк я не знал, как правильно измерить результат, а кол-во кил…
Креатин против недосыпа: как использовать без вреда
Часто задумываюсь о том, как правильно принимать креатин, чтобы получить максимальный эффект.
Многие считают, что креатин - это для спортсменов, качков, да и вообще химия какая-то наравне с тренболоном.
Но для кого этот пост?
Если ты много сидишь, у тебя мало спорта в жизни, работаешь по 10–12 часов, учишься в универе и скоро диплом, сильно устаешь и не высыпаешь…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sid_vanya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ваня S.I.D” (@sid_vanya), 260 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sid_vanya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.