А главный аргумент голосовать против коалиции – что ничего по-настоящему полезного она все равно не делает. Например, помните про декабрьскую "реформу молочного рынка"? https://t.me/Trueisrael/31448 Понятия не имею, что в итоге случилось с этим законом, но воз и ныне там, и дефицит обычного (не безлактозного и не растительного) молока регулярно ощущается на прилавках.

Channel
Эльсплейнинг
@shwalb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
38subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001001615640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shwalb |
| Description | Путевые заметки видавшего виды наблюдателя Израиль | кодинг | котики иногда что-то свое, иногда комментирую комментаторов |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shwalb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 38 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 38 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.5%
- avg views ÷ 38 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 June 2025 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 30 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 102
- Videos
- 12
- Links
- 69
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 62.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Это просто феерическая глупость. Насколько извращенным должно быть понимание о свободе СМИ, чтобы запрещать владельцу СМИ влиять на редакционную политику, а попытку отменить этот идиотизм называть чуть ли не цензурой. Я на этих выборах скорее неопредилившийся, но вот этот закон – скорее аргумент голосовать за коалицию, чем наоборот. https://t.me/israeltoday/17152
Руку пожать отказался, но поцеловать не отказался! Сложные отношения: https://t.me/voiceofisrael/27034
🔥1🤣1
внезапный слон https://t.me/israeltoday/14458
🔥1
тем временем на полимаркете далеко не все уверены что атака вообще состоится до конца года
🔥1
Уже три недели держится саспенс, запасы, которые купили в начале, подходят к концу, пора покупать новые. Для сравнения, в июне прошлого года война с Ираном длилась двенадцать дней, а эвакуации посольств начались всего за два дня до нашей атаки.
🔥1
پس از قتلعام هولناک بیش از شش میلیون یهودی در هولوکاست، جهان با خود عهد بست: «دیگر هرگز». После ужасающего геноцида более шести миллионов евреев во время Холокоста, мир поклялся: «Больше никогда». ما بهطور جمعی متعهد شدیم که هرگز در برابر شرّ مطلق سکوت نکنیم و هرگز اجازه ندهیم غیرنظامیان بیگناه در مقیاسی صنعتی قتلعام شوند. Мы коллективно поклялись никогда больше не молчать перед лицом абсолютного зла и никогда не…
Читая тематические каналы, пока насчитал три версии происходящего: - Трамп действительно решил дать аятоллам еще один шанс - Бахнет, но потом – например через неделю, когда авианосец из Тихого океана приплывет - Техническая задержка по той или иной причине (например, Биби попросил еще пару дней на подготовку), может бахнуть в любой момент
🔥1
а нет, пока не началось
👍1
Окей, кажется началось
👍1
Учитывая сообщения о расстрелах протестующих в Иране, Трамп либо скоро бахнет, либо воздухан. Если бахнет, то аятоллы точно бахнут по нам в ответ – ну, если успеют, но скорее всего успеют. Так что на всякий случай готовим мамады, наборы первой необходимости и запасы воды.
🔥1
Очередной пункт политической программы Моше Фейглина адаптируется политической элитой страны. Все-таки умный он мужик, пусть и своеобразный. Надеюсь, когда-нибудь и до полноценного лигалайза травы дойдет. https://t.me/mesusah/9848
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shwalb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эльсплейнинг” (@shwalb), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shwalb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.