2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 05:30
29
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:13
29
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 17 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
5
Videos
8
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
14
60.9%
❤
5
21.7%
❤🔥
2
8.70%
👌
2
8.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Однажды я поставил себе цель — заработать много миллионов рублей, сделать жену счастливой, путешествовать по лучшим странам, отправить детей в топовые кружки и ездить на премиальном авто.
Этот план я подсмотрел у других предпринимателей.
Я написал бизнес-план, как положено, заплатил за него 25 тысяч рублей и быстро нашёл инвесторов.
Жена верила в меня — даже прочитала книгу «Как сделать мужа миллионером».
У меня бы…
Приглашаем в наш клуб -
На разговоры-обсуждение идей из Книг
Берна, Харриса и Штайнера
(Книги для первого раза читать не обязательно - обсуждаем сами идеи )
ШВК проголосуйте за удобное для вас время встреч :
Вт 10:0033%
Вт 18:3050%
Чт 9:3033%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как с помощью книг улучшить жизнь на трех уровнях стратегии
Жизнь каждого человека (и систем) разворачивается на трёх уровнях:
— ультраструктуры;
— антропоструктуры;
— инфраструктуры.
В зависимости от того, что и как мы читаем, такие изменения в свои жизнь мы и приглашаем.
✅ Инфраструктура — это уровень техники, процессов, продуктов, ресурсов в самом прямом значении: зданий, мебели, транспорта, гаджетов. Сюда же …
"Игры..» - это одна из основополагающих культовых книг по психологии человеческих взаимоотношений.
Эрик Берн – СОЗДАТЕЛЬ оригинального направления в психотерапии – «транзактного анализа», рассматривающего игру в качестве основы человеческих взаимоотношений.
Система, разработанная автором, призвана избавить человека от влияния жизненных сценариев, программирующих его поведение, и научить его меньше «играть» в отноше…
Провели сегодня Бизнес-Завтрак с Александрой Чадовой @alchadova по теме «Анализ и обсуждение идей из великой книги Эрика Берна «Игры, в которые играют люди».
Благодарим за встречу!
Что узнали:
✔️ В какие игры играем мы.
✔️ Согласно теории трансакционного анализа Эрика Берна, в каждом человеке существуют три эго-состояния: родитель, взрослый и ребенок. Человек может находиться в двух из трех состояний одновременно…
…
Дорогие участники встречи!
Прочитать специально экстренно книгу ко встрече, совсем НЕ обязательно!
И порой великие книги, статьи, труды нобелевских лауреатов самостоятельно в одиночку читать не так просто.
В группе мы простыми понятными словами поговорим об основных идеях книги,
Можем вживую подискутировать на эту тему.
И постараемся заинтересовать так, чтобы вам захотелось прочитать эту или другие книги, которые…
Неожиданно у нас записалось больше желающих, чем мы планировали.
Поэтому разбили на 2 встречи утро и вечер.
Утро 10:30 «КотоКафе»
Вечер 18:30 Кофейня «Смыслы»
(Первомайская, 114)
Приходите
Для тех, кто не успел - повторим на следующей неделе.
Количество участников ограничено
Запись в личку обязательна
Писать @alchadova
👌2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @shvk_12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ШВК проголосуйте за удобное для вас время встреч :
Вт 10:0033%
Вт 18:3050%
Чт 9:3033%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 26 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШВК / Школа Великих Книг / Йошкар-Ола” (@shvk_12), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shvk_12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
