4 measurements spanning 31 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 10:01
79
-1
18 Aug 2026, 06:12
80
-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:31
81
no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:46
81
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 8 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
44
47.8%
❤
17
18.5%
👍
11
12.0%
custom 5373098009640836781
8
8.70%
👏
5
5.43%
😁
3
3.26%
😎
2
2.17%
🆒
1
1.09%
💯
1
1.09%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2023 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shvind_lead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 October 2023 to 25 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы с любимой больше года регулярно используем инструменты ИИ. Она как психолог и исследователь, а я как айтишник и управленец.
С одной стороны полярность, а с другой схожесть сфер наводит на интересные размышления и диалоги. Например как сегодня.
Возникла мысль, что ИИ — это новый виток индустриализации. Некая лопата 2.0.
Каждый технологический виток менял масштаб одного человека. Лопата позволила одному делать бо…
Затестил новые модельки в гпт по генерации картинок — прикольна
Промт:
Собери информацию обо мне из интернета или диалогов с тобой и сгенерируй фото или изображение, которое бы меня описывало или характеризовало
Просто поделюсь
Наша банная команда — ИТ менеджеры из разных компаний, собраться попариться непросто, но получается 1-2 раза в квартал, явка ~50%
Искренне, задорно, тепло
Десяток лет назад у меня был запрос найти компанию простых пацанов, с которыми вот так интересно — сбылось 🌞
Брейншторм на воркшопе 🧡
Команды проектируют 2 варианта работы
1 team — по канбан методу
2 team — по скрам методу
Задача построить флоу гарантирующее поставку в срок на 100% и метрики поддерживающие процесс, горизонт планирования один квартал
Интересное — вначале узнали о том что все работают совсем по разному и как будто не имеют цельного понимания обоих методов, но благодаря шарингу контекста, фокусу на задаче, …
Вчера провел свои первые архитектурные ката как организатор 🐱
В этом году активно пью какаушко по воскресеньям с сообществом московских рубистов @moscow_rb 🖼️
Обсуждаем код, архитектуру, процессы, насущные философские вопросы жизни инженера и менеджера. А в прошлую встречу закинули идею разнообразить этот досуг другими форматами ведь в бар мы уже недавно ходили.
Предложил формат и получил отклик, а так как участво…
Спасибо за вовлечённость, предполагал меньший процент отклика 🌞
Из интересного, не ожидал что различная оффлайн движуха и её освещение так интересны. Пару раз в месяц будет что рассказать, влипаю в минимальный движ по умолчанию 💜
В опрос позабыл добавить обзор книг по менеджменту и разработке. Ставьте 📚 если тема интересна.
Также вчерашняя активность по метрикам 🔍
🔵 -4 и +2 подписчика
😀~95% просмотрели
😀~30% прого…
The shares total 234%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍀 Говорят среди подписчиков этого канала есть ждуны.
Честно признаюсь очень много всего и периодически отсекаю менее приоритетные источники внимания и ресурса, фокусируясь на главном.
Чуть ниже будет опрос по формату контента, а в комментариях предлагаю пообсуждать с желающими:
❓ почему ещё в подписках
❓ что обычно читаете в "этих ваших интернетах"
❓ что было бы интересно почитать силами моего пера
#камбек #я_вер…
Лидерство в детстве
Во время массажа мастер спросила "а во что играл в детстве". (На самом деле хотела узнать про то откуда такая телесная чувствительность, что после выяснили и обсудили, но это уже другая история.)
Перечислил лего, самодельные шалаши, секретные шалаши от тех кто их зачем-то ломает, как делал рогатки из правильно подобранного орешника и авиационного жгута, оружие и одежду черепашек ниндзя из листов…
Так как являюсь нанимающим руководителем, то одной из моих задачек является взращивание и разделение команд.
Бывает что это те люди кого нанимал и руководил линейно, наблюдая более плотно, а бывает и совсем незнакомые, но в целом всегда встаёт вопрос знаний в нужных контекстах и сервисах.
Опять поднимается вопрос оценки и субъективности, но у нас нет задачи устраивать какое-то перф ревью, а есть необходимость созда…
Идея сервиса Random coffee выстрелила не так давно, но уже успела завоевать свою аудиторию, а в крупных компаниях это отличный способ пообщаться с коллегами не из своего отдела на общие темы, как в плане работы, так и обо всем.
Готовя описание для нашего корпоративного бота подумал, что не против пообщаться с кем-то из подписчиков, так что велком в личку @shvind с наброском тем, если откликнулось, то что ниже, а там…
🔥3❤1🆒1
Signed Ivan Shvindin
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @shvind_lead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 234%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2023 to 25 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тимлид Ваня” (@shvind_lead), 79 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shvind_lead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
