Channel
@shutovadesign
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
456subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002189202956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shutovadesign |
| Description | Реальные проекты, решения и идеи, которые работают. А еще мысли о дизайне и немного жизни зумера-офисника [Бренд-дизайнер, веб-дизайнер полного цикла] 💌 ЛС: @shutovvva |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shutovadesign |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 456 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 456 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 446 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (16 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,937 |
| Reactions total | 664 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
664 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5280820907869237520 | 124 | 18.7% | |
| custom 5366306300546278565 | 83 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5305697753584649644 | 74 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5456184203521586808 | 68 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5280765468431378029 | 65 | 9.79% | |
| custom 5188636951053357387 | 64 | 9.64% | |
| custom 5258230810116400744 | 61 | 9.19% | |
| custom 5249086038764171248 | 54 | 8.13% | |
| custom 5287238705700961176 | 49 | 7.38% | |
| custom 5454187812528078792 | 22 | 3.31% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 664reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вы думали, я только сайты делаю – а в перерывах гашу апероль с подружкой на веранде🍸
custom 518863695105335738735custom 524908603876417124831custom 525823081011640074425custom 52872387057009611767
а еще у нас на канале новые реакции! и скоро оформление обновлю, а то как-то мне не вкатывает больше этот ваш красный(
custom 525823081011640074428custom 518863695105335738726custom 528723870570096117623custom 52490860387641712483custom 54541878125280787922
очень раздутая тема в интернете сейчас: «Cloude Ai или другая нейронка, что умеет генерировать сайты, снимает нужду в веб-дизайнерах, ведь зачем платить десятки тысяч рублей, когда ИиШечКа может так же бесплатно и за 5 минут🤪🤙🏼» я отдельно эту тему освещу позже, а пока открыла портал в ад в комментариях с запрещенной сети!
custom 524908603876417124820custom 545418781252807879219custom 528723870570096117616custom 51886369510533573873custom 52582308101164007441
можно быть крутым специалистом и всё равно терять клиентов💸 почему так происходит и причём здесь сайт — рассказала в видео. ➡️на бесплатную консультацию можно написать мне в личку @shutovvva
custom 545618420352158680820custom 528076546843137802916custom 528082090786923752015custom 52582308101164007445custom 54541878125280787921
ГОТОВАЯ структура сайта эксперта🤫 смотрим?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 528082090786923752019custom 545618420352158680819custom 536630630054627856515custom 52582308101164007442
🤳РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ 2026: эксперт ведет соцсети, но все равно теряет клиентов соцсети отлично знакомят с экспертом: показывают личность, подход и формируют доверие. но когда человек готов перейти от «прикольно» к «готов купить», ему нужны конкретные ответы: – с чем вы работаете – какие услуги предлагаете – сколько это стоит – почему вам можно доверять – как начать работу в соцсетях эта информация часто разбросана по закре…
custom 528082090786923752013custom 52807654684313780296custom 53056977535846496446custom 52872387057009611763
нас заметно прибавилось!🤩❤️ всех новеньких приглашаю в этот пост! а в комментариях можно рассказать о себе – кто вы, чем занимаетесь и ссылки на канал!
custom 545618420352158680818custom 530569775358464964415custom 536630630054627856514custom 52807654684313780293
а чтобы прийти на бесплатную консультацию к плохому дизайнеру с хорошими работами, писать сюда – @shutovvva 👩💻
custom 528082090786923752018custom 536630630054627856513custom 53056977535846496449custom 52807654684313780292
собрала все ссылки в одном месте, со временем папка подкастов будет пополняться🫂
custom 528082090786923752016custom 536630630054627856514custom 530569775358464964413
🎧Серия MINI-подкастов о дизайне, бизнесе и их сложных отношениях, которые можно сделать легче! Рекомендую к прослушиванию и клиентам, и дизайнерам. №1 [ Правки клиентов и почему я всегда спорю ] №2 [ Влияние ИИ на бренд: почему враг ближе, чем вы думаете ] №3 [Как расшифровать ВКУСНЫЙ дизайн клиента]
custom 528082090786923752013custom 530569775358464964412custom 545618420352158680811
🤩ПОЧЕМУ раздел «Обо мне» часто не продаёт, а утомляет? → потому что многие делают его не для клиента, а для себя. вот как выглядит типичный «обо мне»: «я с детства любила творчество» «в 2018 году прошла первый курс» «потом поняла, что хочу помогать людям» «мой путь был непростым, но очень интересным» мило, конечно, но клиенту эта информация неинтересна👩 свою биографию освещать умесно в личном блоге, куда прихо…
custom 536630630054627856515custom 530569775358464964412custom 528076546843137802911
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 528082090786923752011custom 52807654684313780297custom 53056977535846496445
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @shutovadesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ГОТОВАЯ структура сайта эксперта🤫 смотрим?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 385,764 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марго, сделай сайт” (@shutovadesign), 456 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shutovadesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.