вот же они… анастасия волочкова и лешка н@^@l#ый !!! хочу их мстительное дуо просто с ума сойти 🔪
custom 538877553362443789431custom 53890752063775813939custom 52604179148376912203

Channel
@shummm_no
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
432subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001830921990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shummm_no |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shummm_no |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 432 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 428 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 428 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (3 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,434 |
| Reactions total | 225 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
744 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5388633743869112100 | 208 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5460720908756871275 | 129 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5280639050363982225 | 120 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5417832241512328424 | 117 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5388775533624437894 | 70 | 9.41% | |
| custom 5240423978786379581 | 65 | 8.74% | |
| custom 5389075206377581393 | 27 | 3.63% | |
| custom 5260417914837691220 | 8 | 1.08% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 744reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shummm_no. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
вот же они… анастасия волочкова и лешка н@^@l#ый !!! хочу их мстительное дуо просто с ума сойти 🔪
custom 538877553362443789431custom 53890752063775813939custom 52604179148376912203
Posted without readable text
custom 538877553362443789436custom 538907520637758139318
🤩🤩всем охаешечки, куны и тяночки🤩🤩
custom 528063905036398222543custom 52604179148376912205custom 53887755336244378943
уже до ума не доведу, бог с ними #genshin
custom 528063905036398222542
представим, что я типо не умерла и мне не стыдно за свои огрызки, которые я не могу доделать
custom 528063905036398222535
🪶Алая птица: Чужой среди своих 📝 «Покинув родные края на четыре года, "Тёмный Феникс" вступает в Фатуи под маской лживого прошлого.» 🗡️ «Служба проходит без происшествий, однако в последний год прибывания Феникса в организации, к группе военных приставляют нового главнокомандующего, который от чего-то крайне заинтересован выдающимся, но подозрительно молчаливым солдатом..» 💬 «Товарищ командир, господин Пульчинелла …
custom 524042397878637958130custom 541783224151232842420custom 538863374386911210011
🙏 олд вуман юри #genshin
custom 538863374386911210040custom 541783224151232842416custom 54607209087568712759custom 52404239787863795815
гейщит импакт и жерард уэй кстати подалась в зин по дотолонам, я деградирую
custom 538863374386911210030custom 541783224151232842414custom 546072090875687127514custom 52404239787863795815
чем марщинестей изюм, тем он вкуснее внезапно Зандик #genshin
custom 541783224151232842440custom 546072090875687127518custom 538863374386911210011custom 52404239787863795816
альтернативный финал, где Уиллу все же пришлось отдать свой глаз #byler
custom 538863374386911210049custom 541783224151232842423custom 546072090875687127512
платоник милевен вперде #mikewheeler
custom 538863374386911210052custom 546072090875687127513custom 52404239787863795814custom 54178322415123284244
пытаюсь понять спустя 8 лет беспрерывного гиперфикса на рид900 как меня угораздило утонуть в слащаво-хайповых байлерах, которые не имеют совершенно ничего общего с тем, что мне обычно нравится…искренне надеюсь, что новым людям тут окей кушать ебануто разный контент, ибо лично меня штырит не по-детски, но переживания имеются, так как в моей картине мира ни одному здоровому человеку одновременно такое просто не может н…
custom 546072090875687127563custom 524042397878637958115custom 538863374386911210015
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @shummm_no. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 898,764 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“shummno” (@shummm_no), 432 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shummm_no.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.