Channel
@shtory_shew_shew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002784387226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shtory_shew_shew |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shtory_shew_shew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 43 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 41 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 41 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 27.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 17.5% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 17.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я очень хотела купить цветы у бабули (это мамины любимые), но у меня не было налички, я всю потратилаааааа и мы уходим, я уже думаю где взять наличку и тут в кафе заходит парень с этими цветами и отдает их нам!!!! круговорот астр в природе!!! я в шоке!
🔥2
Предложение было внезапным - нужно сшить чехол на металлические конструкции, сделать «маркизу» как во французских и итальянских кафе. Конечно, легко! Из соображений экономии выбрали техническую ткань, но все получилось.. И вот проходит два года, и снова она, теперь это единая конструкция и нужен новый чехол! Ткань та же, посмотрим, сколько этот чехол прослужит..
❤2🔥2
Пыталась работать блогером, один рилс - полдня работы. Ну для тех, кто не знает чем мы мы занимаемся😁
❤🔥2👍1
Про уличные ткани и зачем иногда стоит платить больше
❤🔥3🔥2
До-после
❤🔥3
Сегодня попросила ИИ сделать картинку поярче.. ну что ж..
👍1
Нарушаю законодательство РФ. Потратила, наверно, час, чтоб найти новый впн. Сижу в тг и даже в вотсапе иногда переписываюсь.. народ туда вернулся? Инста живее всех живых, ютьюб полон свеженького.. Дочь из Москвы пишет в вк. Белые списки в центре Москвы работают)) ну хоть так.. Многие хотят написать в Макс. Но, кроме известных причин, эта сволочь жрет батарею, что мне совсем не подходит.. Но, вроде как, продажники …
❤1👍1
Первая встреча с дизайнерами интерьеров. Выступала 2 часа и еще час общения. Очень позитивная и полезная встреча.. рассказала про ниши и карнизы от потолочников (боль! Куда ж без них), смотрели ткани, обсуждали перспективы развития дизайна и тренды.. встречи будут регулярными, интерьерщикам и текстильщикам есть чем поделиться друг с другом
👍4❤1
Сегодня хотела снять свой рабочий день, благо дел было много, но, конечно, забыла😁
❤4
Сегодня вот эту свою работу нашла в аккаунте дизайнера из Ярославля. Ну что, считаю, это признание 😁
😁5
Весь прошлый год у меня были проблемы с доплатами от клиентов за заказы, если мы договаривались о доплате после установки.. думала начнется Новый год и все наладится (ага, с чего бы?).. и вот установка в 2026 году и опять «оплачу позже». А это как раз деньги швей и установщиков, которые я постоянно плачу из своего кармана пока жду оплаты счета. Ну что, никакой постоплаты в 2026 году! Даже от постоянных клиентов, про…
На 2 недели у нас две 🐈 🐈⬛
😁2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shtory_shew_shew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шторы шью, и шью, и шью..” (@shtory_shew_shew), 43 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shtory_shew_shew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.