开课啦。宝宝们
❤2
Channel
@shsue281
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004289295216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shsue281 |
| Created | 13 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shsue281 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 199 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 192 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (13 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,832 |
| Reactions total | 83 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
83 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 57.8% | |
| 🐳 | 33 | 39.8% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 2.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
开课啦。宝宝们
❤2
【编号】:4563 【时间】:2026-08-16 【状态】:待审核 【留名】:李嘉图 【老师】:柔柔 【评级】:好评 【综合】:10 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:- - - 【过程】:提前几天约的柔柔,见到本人完全超预期!人照一致!女友感爆棚!落地第一天疲惫就让柔柔来上门,老师好小只,进门口交了水费一起洗了,鸳鸯浴老师洗得很认真,然后二弟自己起立了,老师口的很好很舒服,没有尺感,给老师穿上,我特意买的袜子非常的美,身材一丝赘肉都没有,然后进入流程,先是老师动,后来老师这个时候爬到我身上真是无敌,然后妹妹累了,然后也是换成传教士以后太紧了,直接交完枪以后开始搂着老师跟老师亲亲,老师后来开始身体忍不住,然后开始行动直接后入年轻的身体,确实着迷意思都没有非常的舒服,把老师压在身下感觉这是太棒了,完全超预期!兄弟们放心冲!
开课啦。宝贝们
🐳33❤15🦄2
💯 车评系统 | 默认模式 【老师信息】:柔柔 【验证留名】:嫩妹无敌 【上课时间】:2026-08-07 【整体评价】:👍 好评 【人照得分】:9.5 【颜值得分】:9 【身材得分】:10,巨嫩 【服务得分】:9 【态度得分】:10 【环境得分】:9 【过程描述】:遥控上楼,开门之后深爱嫩妹的我直接沦陷,人照符合95%,我爱嫩妹,进去聊了一下天然后洗澡,妹妹特别温柔,忍不住亲了一下,洗完躺着,妹妹可乖了,配合度超高,简直和女朋友一样,🐻也好看我喜欢,亲亲抱抱摸摸舔舔之后开启正事,嫩妹就一个字,紧。各种姿势都很配合,我超爱这个!!!喜欢嫩妹的无脑冲,桩机留情别凿坏了,下次再去! 【上课证明】:
📣 TG海南修车总群 – 信息共享,资源交流 无论你是找资源,还是想交流经验、结识同城伙伴,这里都是你的最佳选择! 欢迎加入,一起探索更多可能!🚀 海南修车导航页 https://t.me/HaiNanSheng
【时间】:2026-05-01 【老师】:柔柔 【留名】:graoeii 【人照】:10 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:9.5 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.67 【过程】:今天刚好有时间,约了老师,老师回复的很快,约好了时间和地点,到了老师的课室,一开门映入眼帘的就是初恋般的女友,很年轻的小女生,身材苗条皮肤白皙,确认是喜欢的类型,跟榜上的照片相似度几乎一样。 交了水费,老师拉着小手就去开洗,还没洗完都二弟都已经硬的不行了。好戏开场了,到了床上先挑逗一下嫩妹,69 和舌吻一顿下来管饱。 前戏做完了,就开始进入主题,先来传教士,刚怼进去,嫩妹的妹妹就是紧致,夹的弟弟受不了,太久没做了,搞得很敏感。没一会就缴械投降了。 休息了一会,跟老师聊聊天,老师比较聊得来。 接着下半场开始了,换后入找找感觉,做累了,换女上,让老师动一会,边做边🐍的感觉来得快,经过不懈的努力,交代了,把二弟累坏了🤣。整个过程都比较配…
❤31
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @shsue281. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 925,731 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柔柔的朋友圈” (@shsue281), 199 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shsue281.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.