Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

l ˶o̴̶̷᷄‸o̴̶̷̥᷅˶

@shsmzl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002376280610
TypeChannel
Username@shsmzl
DescriptionКанал создан исключительно для моего творчества. https://t.me/MavinDayan
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shsmzl

Growth

419 August 2026 — 41 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41 subscribers9 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:3141no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:4741first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.9%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total118
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
41
Videos
1
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.52% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5213340481953487582209.52%
custom 5377547320881586194178.10%
custom 5879815545393521121167.62%
custom 5267498589331924283146.67%
custom 5393203434453233121146.67%
custom 5433939451204109058146.67%
custom 5258416649056299906136.19%
custom 5364149818941796627125.71%
125.71%
custom 5413554428315722020115.24%
custom 539554731836574260494.29%
custom 525830708444058003973.33%
custom 503742703535023894062.86%
custom 524262815170773090162.86%
custom 526044117638057496062.86%
custom 532361993485134496241.90%
custom 532831030113155852041.90%
custom 546547317840074800341.90%
custom 521327400874463278231.43%
🎄31.43%
10 further kinds157.14%

Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shsmzl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC17 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

📝

  1. 🤩🤩50%
  2. 🤩🤩13%
  3. 🤩38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52132740087446327822custom 52584166490562999061

31 Jul 2026, 03:16 UTC44 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ТВ/КВ: зомби, небольшое разложение ::качество плохое 🫠 #арт #animalhospital 🌟 щп 😓

custom 52583070844405800392custom 53775473208815861942custom 52132740087446327821custom 52222021204715914801custom 52584166490562999061custom 54407391403479077221

22 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC57 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🐥 щп #Арт #Mmm 🤩 🎊

custom 52426281517077309015custom 52583070844405800393custom 52584166490562999063custom 53775473208815861942custom 50374270353502389401

10 Jul 2026, 23:12 UTC98 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥺 #арт #animalhospital 🌟🌟✨ 😵‍💫 щп 🙏

custom 53775473208815861946custom 52584166490562999064custom 52583070844405800392custom 50374270353502389401custom 52426281517077309011

26 Jun 2026, 21:43 UTC156 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

кто ть 🥺 #арт #animalhospital 😵‍💫 щп

custom 53775473208815861947custom 53236199348513449624custom 50374270353502389403custom 52584166490562999062custom 54295586704615296121

14 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC182 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

➖🌺 Инф #конни #джиджи #арт 🌟 ➖

custom 53955473183657426049custom 52584166490562999062custom 52674985893319242832custom 52133404819534875821custom 54295586704615296121

6 Jun 2026, 01:11 UTC183 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сделаем вид, что не почти правильный дизайн так и задуман🌟 #арт #Сиджвин ➖

custom 52674985893319242834custom 53283103011315585203custom 53279419217865825342custom 53932034344532331211custom 54291170103845507981

26 May 2026, 23:01 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

??

  1. 💉62%
  2. 🌌23%
  3. 🌟23%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 52674985893319242832custom 54339394512041090582custom 53283103011315585201

16 May 2026, 23:59 UTC231 views13 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

с каждым разом астро выходит все хуже 😭 Ps :можете считать, что это перерисовка старого арта, потому что у меня не было идей на них... #астро #конни #арт 👩‍❤️‍👨

custom 52604411763805749606custom 52133404819534875822custom 52674985893319242832custom 54135544283157220202custom 54339394512041090581

15 May 2026, 00:09 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

?...

  1. 🤩29%
  2. 🤩57%
  3. 🤩14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52133404819534875822custom 53932034344532331212custom 53641498189417966271

12 May 2026, 19:48 UTC200 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мне било лень рисовать и я бистро наскечил 💨 #мадока #скетч 🤫

custom 54654731784007480033custom 52674985893319242832custom 53641498189417966271custom 53932034344532331211custom 54135544283157220201custom 54339394512041090581

6 May 2026, 21:36 UTC163 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

када вспомнил что умеешь рисовать (следующую нарисую Мадоку😇) #арт #персонаж 💖

custom 53932034344532331213custom 52133404819534875822custom 54135544283157220202custom 58798155453935211212custom 53641498189417966271custom 54339394512041090581

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shsmzl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTCFinal Results8 voters

📝

  1. 🤩🤩50%
  2. 🤩🤩13%
  3. 🤩38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 May 2026, 23:01 UTCFinal Results13 voters

??

  1. 💉62%
  2. 🌌23%
  3. 🌟23%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 May 2026, 00:09 UTCFinal Results7 voters

?...

  1. 🤩29%
  2. 🤩57%
  3. 🤩14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 902,173 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“l ˶o̴̶̷᷄‸o̴̶̷̥᷅˶” (@shsmzl), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shsmzl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.