Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шрифтовая ХТОПП

Channel

Шрифтовая ХТОПП

@shriftovaya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

781subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002324399787
TypeChannel
Username@shriftovaya
DescriptionКанал шрифтовой мастерской Института графики и искусства книги имени В. А. Фаворского при Московском Политехе (бывший Полиграф, МПИ, МГУП) Сайт www.shriftovaya.ru
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shriftovaya

Growth

7817 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 781 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:47 — 781 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:308 Aug 2026, 01:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 780–782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:47781no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:30781first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 781 subscribers
Avg views / post
194
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held10 (13 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total387
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
674
Videos
64
Links
106

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5346.9%
1311.5%
👻97.96%
👍76.19%
💯65.31%
👀54.42%
💔54.42%
🔥54.42%
🤔54.42%
43.54%
👾10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026

ВНИМАНИЕ! Есть шанс попасть бесплатно!

30 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC186 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @typedesignworkshopVideo

Открываем набор на Type Design Workshop PRO 2026–27 Type Design Workshop PRO — программа для тех, кто уже сделал первые шаги в разработке шрифта и хочет двигаться дальше. Ведущие преподаватели Мария Дореули Анна Хораш В течение шести месяцев мы будем работать над развитием вашего проекта, обсуждать устройство шрифтовых семейств, развивать систему начертаний, расширять языковую поддержку, познакомимся с вариативным

9👍2

30 Jun 2026, 18:35 UTC361 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В Политехе ещё защиты, а тем временем шрифтовое лето идет своим чередом… Уже завтра обещают много про кириллицу, аж три дня подряд. Будем смотреть?

4

30 Jun 2026, 18:35 UTC405 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ru_calligraphyPhoto

1 июля начинаются «Перья-крылья», бесплатная онлайн-конференция по каллиграфии. Впереди три каллиграфических дня: мастер-классы, лекции, презентации. Пятнадцать выступлений, почти сутки суммарного времени эфиров. Эфиры можно смотреть в ВК или в Зуме. Ждем и профессионалов, и новичков, и тех, кто еще никогда не брал в руки перо! Подробная программа и форма регистрации: https://rucalligraphy.ru/conference Эфиры у н

7

24 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC498 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

А что для вас экзамен?

  1. Новый вызов. Лучшее средство от застоя и деградации.19%
  2. Кошмар, который нужно пережить.68%
  3. Не понимаю о чём вы. Меня боготворят просто за то, что я есть. (Возможно, я—кот)27%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👻9💔5🤔5

24 Jun 2026, 12:03 UTC469 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«ЭКЗАМЕНАЦИЯ» от Евдокии Васильевой

10🔥53👍1👾1

24 Jun 2026, 12:03 UTC402 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот мы и пережили сессию. Каждый раз одно и тоже, и всё равно как в первый раз. Тема экзамена актуальна не только для студентов и школьников. В течение всей жизни нам с вами регулярно приходится доказывать свои умения и навыки, а иногда—просто право заниматься любимым делом. Потому, вот вам аж две порции стикеров на тему. И удачи тем, кто сейчас защищает дипломы. «ЭКЗАМЕНАЦИЯ» от Елизаветы Албановой

7💯6👍41

13 Jun 2026, 12:46 UTC489 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Любая классификация условна. Шрифтовые формы эволюционировали постепенно, так что какие-то из них оказались на границе двух групп. И не всегда мы можем четко ответить на вопрос: «вот эта антиква ещё динамическая или уже переходная?». Геометрический принцип формообразования вообще вызывает много вопросов, так как там мы даже не можем сформулировать четкий набор признаков. Начертить, как выяснилось, можно практически в

137👀5

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @shriftovaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTCAnonymous Poll105 voters

А что для вас экзамен?

  1. Новый вызов. Лучшее средство от застоя и деградации.19%
  2. Кошмар, который нужно пережить.68%
  3. Не понимаю о чём вы. Меня боготворят просто за то, что я есть. (Возможно, я—кот)27%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шрифтовая ХТОПП” (@shriftovaya), 781 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shriftovaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.