t.me/aoboco778

Channel
浦东三林周浦晚晚
@shpdjqww
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,519subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003598711613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shpdjqww |
| Description | 请哥哥提前预约 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shpdjqww |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 1,519 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 1,519 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.46%
- avg views ÷ 1,519 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 22.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (19 September 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 89 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 10
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
文员兼职第一次下海 工作室在浦东三林,安全私密 艺名:晚晚 ❤️保证服务 学历:本科 ❤️保证行规 家乡: 广东 ❤️保证靠谱 身高:158 ❤️自带工作室 体重:90斤 年龄:23 胸围:C 特点:声音甜美 乖巧可爱 三点粉嫩 鲢鱼系美女 私处紧密 敏感体质 水流多多 0整容 不抽烟 不喝酒 0纹身 可纯可御 课本:kiss 深情吹箫 jk,69式 十指漫游 高山流水 制服 黑丝白丝袜 情趣 高跟鞋 🐻推 足推 哥哥也可以带自己喜欢的衣服让我换上 账号 @aoboco778 个人频道 @shpdjqww 双向机器人 @Shanghaixiaowanwan_bot 课费 12/p 50分钟 22/pp 90分钟 包时4000 包夜6000 包天一万 🈲无套🈲醉酒🈲磕药🈲皮肤病性病
Channel name was changed to «浦东三林周浦晚晚»
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @shpdjqww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“浦东三林周浦晚晚” (@shpdjqww), 1,519 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shpdjqww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.