Channel
@showthinking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003911191556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @showthinking |
| Description | размышляем, мандим и несем ересь |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/showthinking |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 58 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 58 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,187 |
| Reactions total | 163 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
197 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458490854362608397 | 66 | 33.5% | |
| custom 5393391816013805459 | 56 | 28.4% | |
| custom 5379952060185751460 | 39 | 19.8% | |
| custom 5834802016093737957 | 36 | 18.3% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ботик свежий и только сделанный, + я не до конца разобралась будто. если что то барахлит,не доходит с моей/вашей стороны — пишите под этим постом! будем разбираться
custom 54584908543626083978custom 53933918160138054597custom 53799520601857514604custom 58348020160937379572
～。люми нудит pinned «@showthinking_bot теперь у нас есть анонимный бот-предложка! ✌️ вы можете писать сюда любые свои вопросы, предложения к новой теме обсуждения или высказаться о каком то событии в медиа,желая поссссплетничать😀»
@showthinking_bot теперь у нас есть анонимный бот-предложка! ✌️ вы можете писать сюда любые свои вопросы, предложения к новой теме обсуждения или высказаться о каком то событии в медиа,желая поссссплетничать😀
custom 53933918160138054599custom 54584908543626083977custom 53799520601857514605custom 58348020160937379572
выбираем следующую тему обсуждения?
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53799520601857514605custom 54584908543626083975custom 58348020160937379575custom 53933918160138054593
я обещала сделать разбор — я сделала от вас только реакции, пожизненный респект и,если кто то захочет, репост куда вам угодно 🤫 не знаю как вы,но лично я люблю Изму не за что-то из перечисленного,а за это ее: ЖМИ НА РЫЧАГ КРООООНК!!!! 😭
custom 545849085436260839710custom 583480201609373795710custom 53933918160138054599
Posted without readable text
custom 545849085436260839716custom 539339181601380545913custom 537995206018575146012custom 58348020160937379574
чуваки фигня какая то с текстом,если вы не понимаете что здесь происходит или хотите вырвать себе глаза от увиденного бедлама я уже исправляю все
custom 54584908543626083976custom 53799520601857514604custom 53933918160138054594
сейчас я в отпуске и не имею рядышком инвентаря для съемки..
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53799520601857514601custom 53933918160138054591custom 54584908543626083971custom 58348020160937379571
на подумать-покумекать постик чудесной ватамоты 🐚🌷 оч люблю канал психологи ватамота,к слову и советую там посидеть 😌
custom 54584908543626083972custom 53799520601857514601custom 53933918160138054591custom 58348020160937379571
не думай о белом медведе Человек перебил меня на середине фразы, и внутри мгновенно вскинулось раздражение — горячее и несоразмерное поводу. Первым делом я, конечно, попыталась его не заметить. И зря. Вегнер в восьмидесятых поставил простой опыт: попробуй минуту не думать о белом медведе. Казалось бы, задача из детских: подумаешь, один медведь, отвернись да живи дальше. Но стоит поставить его под запрет, и он занима…
custom 53799520601857514601custom 53933918160138054591custom 54584908543626083971custom 58348020160937379571
tianfu art museum & the bamboo fountains 🍃🍦 сегодня был насыщенный день! вчера я купила национальное платье ципао и уже сегодня в нем красуюсь 🥹 были в гос. музее современного искусства,это до безумия круто! очень качественные как по качеству, так и по поднимающейся теме выставки +тусовались на фонтанах,где я заставила меня срочно щелкать,даже если это уничтожает чьи-то нервные клетки 😇
custom 58348020160937379574custom 53799520601857514602custom 53933918160138054592custom 54584908543626083971
видео в процессе~ я не забыла,правда правда!
custom 54584908543626083972
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @showthinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
выбираем следующую тему обсуждения?
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
сейчас я в отпуске и не имею рядышком инвентаря для съемки..
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 866,477 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“～。люми нудит” (@showthinking), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/showthinking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.