Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ШОС

@shosbelarus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

169subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471341525
TypeChannel
Username@shosbelarus
DescriptionОбсуждение - https://t.me/shosbelaruschat Обратная связь - @shosbelarusbot Помощь ШОСу - @shosvolunteer_bot
Created18 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/shosbelarus

Growth

168169168.57 Aug 2026, 11:34 — 168 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:15 — 169 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:15 — 169 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:348 Aug 2026, 15:15
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:15169no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:15169+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:34168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.0%
avg views ÷ 169 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held20 (31 December 202516 July 2026)
Views total98
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
452
Videos
114
Links
693

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1034.5%
👍724.1%
517.2%
😢26.90%
🙏26.90%
❤‍🔥13.45%
🔥13.45%
🤬13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

Просим не поддаваться на сообщения из непроверенных источников и не делиться чувствительной информацией с ботами, за которыми стоят неизвестные вам люди.

9 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC112 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://m.colta.ru/articles/vyvih/29759-obschestvennaya-tkan-mertveet?fbclid=IwZnRzaAS8JABwZG9mA2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7T2AR1zcE1cNXZJh3yJbR7zAeeaIulmat34YLuh-eiHEU80GKsBaWpD5bi_Q_aem_YL2dDmTofIapMPh8ZH8qJA

4 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC133 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИСП РАН участвует в конференции ООН по ИИ в Женеве. Тот же ИСП РАН известен как ведущий разработчие систем искусственного интеллекта для БПЛА для армии РФ, монопольный поставщик софта для работы с секретной документацией в РФ, системами разведки и слежки и так далее.

🤬1

30 Jun 2026, 18:30 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

27 июня в Бресте убили Евгения Васильева. Удобно: территория за пределами РФ, "остановка сердца из-за употребления алкоголя на жаре". Поскольку убийство произошло на территории Республики Беларусь, мы провели своё расследование. Причины убийства сможем озвучить через несколько недель. Пока что то, что можно рассказать, опубликовано в блоге его матери: https://evasiljeva.blogspot.com/2026/06/blog-post_29.html

❤‍🔥1

13 Jun 2026, 07:06 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sxod_by

Пошта sxod2026@… таксама належыць злачынцам. Мы ня рабілі такой скрынкі

13 Jun 2026, 07:06 UTC109 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sxod_by

Увага! На наш чат была атака ботаў. Таму была выдалена ссылка на ўступленьня. Рэжымныя агентура адразу зрабіла клон чата па той жа спасылцы. Ня дадавайцесь. Чат па старой спасылцы кантралююць невядомыя злачынцы.

6 May 2026, 20:50 UTC417 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Письмо к Зеленскому с просьбой обменять Кардаш на Веремейчика. Просим подписать и распространить: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NwRBqL1srdOMw472dt5Zrz079bqiI9Fq1--BWJBlXwo/edit?usp=sharing

5

29 Apr 2026, 11:28 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если кто-то думает, что Боня и ко - это революция или реальное недовольство, глубоко заблуждается. В сущности это та же сказка о хорошем царе и плохих боярах, ну или «толстой стене вокруг путинга» - такой же новояз, как и отрицательный рост с задымлением. Это контролируемое окончание войны. Хорошо спланированный голос народа, который будет услышан хорошим царем. После чего народ обольют плановым восторгом. Да, услов

👍2

28 Apr 2026, 19:02 UTC107 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @VictoryDronesPhoto

Загадка Перед Вами - запрос в Гугл Трендах по России. Угадайте, какой запрос так взлетел? Боня? ВПН? Нет! Это запрос «квартиры в Белоруссии». Судя по всему, начинается новая волна эмиграции, которую называют ВПН-эмиграция. По крайней мере, люди об этом думают и думают всерьез. Проблема в том, что за 4 года ситуация изменилась, люди чувствуют, что мест, куда можно уехать, становится все меньше и меньше. А Белорусь

12 Apr 2026, 21:26 UTC102 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @realization_victoryVideo

Демка клипа на песню "Новогодний ШОС"

3 Mar 2026, 23:11 UTC285 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

Всем огромное спасибо! Не прошло и 24 часа. А кто не успел - есть ещё очень много хороших инициатив. Отчёт по собранной сумме, дальнейшие шаги будут по мере выполнения. В этих двух анонимизированных файлах каждый сможет найти свой вклад. В таблицу добавлен последний перевод, который прошёл позже (автор знает), и три взноса оффлайн

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shosbelarus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ШОС” (@shosbelarus), 169 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shosbelarus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.