Channel
@shomronpolicy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002042329317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shomronpolicy |
| Description | חירות, חוק ויראת שמיים |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shomronpolicy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 95 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 95 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 754 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
60 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 31.7% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 11.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 11.7% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 8.33% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
К вопросу ограниченного потенциала воздушных ударов. Украина начала экспортные поставки электроэнергии в Румынию. Частично это объясняется некомпетентностью и неспособностью российских генералов. Но, частично это обусловлено устойчивостью современных промышленных объектов. Для уничтожения без возможности восстановления необходимы неоднократные и массированные удары по одним и тем же объектам. Украинская энергет…
👍1💯1
И последнее по поводу Сеуты. Граница между Марокко и Суетой, по мнению всех, кто изучал вопрос, это совершенный образец использования технических средств охраны государственной границы. Стена, датчики и камеры, полоса отчуждения - все сделано близко к идеалу. Об этом стоит помнить, когда появятся очередные предложения оградиться стеной и техническими средствами от Газы и Западного берега. Стены - это хорошо и важно…
💯1
The Atlantic и The Guardian практически одновременно опубликовали статьи о недопустимости привлечения внимания к миграционному кризису в Суете. В The Atlantic выступила Anne Appelebaum, хороший историк, знаток России и Советского Союза, но, к сожалению, упертая сторонница либерализма и идеи "конца истории". В The Guardian написал профессор Оксфорда. Предложение игнорировать легко наблюдаемые проблемы - это единстве…
🔥3
Сумасшедшая социалистка имеет хорошие шансы стать губернатором штата Висконсин. Наблюдатели и сайты букмекеров считают, что у республиканцев и демократов примерно одинаковые шансы победить на предстоящих выборах губернатора. Кандидат республиканцев - вырос в сельской местности, сын фермеров, знаком с проблемами сельского хозяйства, окончил колледж, пятнадцать лет работал в нефтяной отрасли, затем создал свою экскур…
😢4👍1
Очень интересная колонка в The New York Times. Автор - сын менеджера иранской нефтяной компании, убитого в 1978 году, незадолго до исламской революции. Рассказ о событиях пятидесятилетней давности становится гораздо более интересным, после того, как мы узнаем, что руководители организации организовавшей покушение стали руководителями Корпуса стражей исламской революции. Говоря о текущих событиях, автор обращает вн…
👏1
Opinion | This Is What My Father’s Assassination Taught Me About the War in Iran - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/02/opinion/iran-revolution-father-murder-boroujerdi-grimm.html
Неделя заканчивается. Всем хорошего Шаббата.
❤3
Одна из причин негативного отношения к Израилю среди современных европейских левых, это явное понимание, что Израиль не планирует допускать бесконтрольной миграцию, а потому всегда будет примером как можно жить без завоза толп бандитов и социальных паразитов.
❤4😁1
Никогда такого не было, и вот опять. Сначала испанское правительство объявляет амнистию нелегальным мигрантам. Более полумиллиона нелегальных мигрантов получили легальный статус и право на воссоединение семей. Затем, Верховный суд Испании запретил высылать в упрощённом порядке мигрантов, которые добрались до африканских анклавов Испании. Затем десятки тысяч мигрантов устремились на штурм Сеуты, чтобы получить прав…
🔥4
Washington Post предлагает свой анализ ситуации с Ираном. Хвалят военных, хвалят разведку, хвалят Marco Rubio. Из всех сил, ругают JD Vance и тех, кто выступает за переговоры. Со многим можно поспорить. Если бы, авиаудары были столь успешны, как пишет автор, то иранцы бы уже сдались. Одно можно сказать совершенно точно. Иранцы не готовы заключить соглашение, которое устроит США и страны Залива, не говоря уж о согл…
👍4
Opinion | Donald Trump should take Iran war advice from those who have delivered - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/07/30/donald-trump-should-take-iran-war-advice-those-who-have-delivered/
The Hill публикует статью о новом повороте в судьбе сенатора от Пенсильвании John Fetterman. По результатам опросов 48% зарегистрированных избирателей Пенсильвании положительно оценивают результаты работы John Fetterman, 41% - отрицательно. Ситуация становится гораздо интереснее, если учесть партийные предпочтения опрошенных. 77% опрошенных республиканцев одобряют, 69% демократов - не одобряют, 52% демократов приве…
💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shomronpolicy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,334,687 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shomron Policy Research” (@shomronpolicy), 95 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shomronpolicy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.