تا ۷۵٪ تخفیف در جشنواره پاییزی لینگانو! تخفیف ویژه ۷۵ درصدی روی دوره جامع آموزش زبان لینگانو، فقط برای کاربران تلگرام🤩 ✅ بیش از ۷۲ ساعت آموزش و ۱۴۶ جلسه آموزشی ✅ مناسب همه افراد، از مبتدی تا پیشرفته ✅ همراه با جزوه، تمرین و آزمون اختصاصی برای هر درس و ۳ هدیه اختصاصی برای شما😍️️️️️️🎁 ✨ مینیدوره «یادگیری زبان با سریال فرندز» ✨ مینیدوره «لغات و کالوکیشن» ✨ ۱ سال اشتراک رایگان هوشمصنوعی لینگانو (دستیار هوش مصنوعی …

Channel
JobFinder l کاریاب
@shoghl_yaby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,939subscribers
-402 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001318937010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shoghl_yaby |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shoghl_yaby |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:37 | 20,939 | -15 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:37 | 20,954 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 20,961 | -15 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:34 | 20,976 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:57 | 20,986 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:40 | 20,998 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:40 | 21,005 | -17 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:09 | 21,022 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 21,029 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 21,039 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 21,052 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:31 | 21,066 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:11 | 21,078 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:45 | 21,095 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 21,101 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 21,108 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 21,124 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 21,139 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 21,143 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:06 | 21,150 | first reading |
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.95%
- avg views ÷ 20,939 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 827
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 102 (17 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 20,670 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 03:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴مهم: اولین اپلیکیشن درآمد خودکار با هوش مصنوعی معرفی شد 🛜 کاملا فعال حتی با نت ملی 🎉به دلیل شرایط فعلی به صورت کاملا (رایگان) این سیستم در اختیار مردم ایران قرار میگیرد: ❌بدون سرمایه ❌بدون مهارت قبلی ✅حتی با نت ملی ✅فقط روزانه ۲ ساعت 💰درآمد بین ۷۰ تا ۱۲۰ میلیون تومن ثبت نام در کارگاه و دریافت تاپلیکیشن👇🏼https://monetizeai.site/291 ⚠️در کارگاه فردا، این اپلیکیشن معرفی و قدم به قدم آموزش داده میشود 🔴رایگان برای…
🔥 قیمت تتر رو بازار میگه؛ تترِ جهانگیری رو نیپوتو! همون تتر. 30٪ ارزونتر. انتخاب هوشمندانهتر. 💸 تتر با قیمت جهانگیری؛ با 30٪ تخفیف در نیپوتو 👇دریافت تتر👇 https://nipo.to/tsy
اخبار کوتاه دانشجویی 👇👇 https://t.me/uni_azadii
😮💨 از قطع و وصلی خسته شدی؟ 🌐 ابرینه؛ سریع، بیدردسر، بدون محدودیت دستگاه 🎁 اول مجانی تست کن: ۲۰۰ مگ، ۱ روزه 👈 t.me/abrinehnet_bot?start=ad_hamid
ظرفیت 3نفررررررررر
🛑 کار پاره وقت با پایه درامد ۲۵_۴۰ میلیون تومن با کریپتو 😍💵 لینک عضویت👇 https://t.me/+wPqDHgu5h984OTQ5 https://t.me/+wPqDHgu5h984OTQ5
بشدت ب دانشجویان جویای کار توصیه می شود 👆👆👆
🔥فرصت شغلی عالی 💥با کمترین هزینه برای استارت ✅ 💥درآمد روزانه حلال از ۷۰۰هزار تومان به بالا 💴 💥پاره وقت ، مجازی💯 اطلاعات بیشتر 👇 @Faramarzi_59 @Faramarzileilan_bot
بشدت ب دانشجویان جویای کار توصیه می شود 😍👆
🛑 کار پاره وقت با پایه درامد ۲۵_۴۰ میلیون تومن با کریپتو 😍💵 لینک عضویت👇 https://t.me/+wPqDHgu5h984OTQ5 https://t.me/+wPqDHgu5h984OTQ5
اگه دنبال شغل پاره وقت هستی و دوران دانشجویی درامد خوبی میخوای وارد کانال بالا شووووووو👆
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @shoghl_yaby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @shoghl_yaby as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 22 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 4 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@danshga_azad · 83,43210 postsدانشجو برتر 🎓
@danshjo_bartar · 95,3366 postsکارخانه هوشمصنوعی ایران
@aiif_channel · 2,0872 postsدیوار دانشجویی🎓
@divar_danshjo · 31,2022 postsProfessional Research
@Professional_research · 1,4141 postدانشجو 😂😉
@gp_dansh · 1,6221 postحل امتحان ،پروژه و تکالیف دانشجویی
@halaemthan · 1861 postهشتگ تبلیغ تخصصی
@hashtagads · 3,4181 postموسسه بین المللی علوم نوبنیاد
@iins_ir · 36,1651 postMcinews
@mcinews · 2,5111 postانجمن علمی توسعه پایدار دانشگاه تهران
@sdg_environment_ut · 3991 postاستراتژیست باهوشانه | محمدگنجی
@strategist_bahooshaneh · 3,4521 postتدریسانه
@tadrisanehcom · 6871 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@PooyaTaraz_Pishtaz · 10,1293 postsکارخانه هوشمصنوعی ایران
@aiif_channel · 2,0872 postsدانشجو برتر 🎓
@danshjo_bartar · 95,3362 postsخانه پژوهش
@theHouseofResearchTeam · 6932 postsبلیت اتوبوس | آروباس
@arobus_ir · 9,1221 postاطلاع رسانی دانشگاه آزاد 🎓
@danshga_azad · 83,4321 postDeepNex.Academy
@DeepNex_Academy · 6831 postدیوار دانشجویی🎓
@divar_danshjo · 31,2021 postحل امتحان ،پروژه و تکالیف دانشجویی
@halaemthan · 1861 postMcinews
@mcinews · 2,5111 post💻 | Notebook Store
@NotebookStor · 14,2001 postخدمات دانشجویی (فلاح)
@online24_24 · 27,2991 postبروکر اوربکس | ORBEX
@orbex_iran · 7,9791 postProfessional Research
@Professional_research · 1,4141 postفیلترشکن| فیلتر شکن| کانفیگ| کانفیگ پرسرعت| نت ملی| اینترنت ملی| VPN|| v2
@sokanvpn · 281 postاستراتژیست باهوشانه | محمدگنجی
@strategist_bahooshaneh · 3,4521 postUni net channel
@uuni_net · 991 postباشگاه مخترعان جوان
@Young_Inventors_Club · 6971 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@shoghl_yaby named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026 · confirmed gone 6 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 30 September 2026 – 9 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 30 September 2026 – 9 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@full_jab · 8,473#1
@danshjo_bartar · 95,336#2
@ProzheLancer · 40,903#3
@FREELANCERVIIP · 20,508#4
@job_freelancer · 31,937#5
@Collegian_Projection · 32,191#6
@PROAJECTE · 17,097#7
@DorkariLand · 53,298#8
@projct_ir · 9,365#9
@Daneshjoo_Com · 46,843#10
@projeh_2400 · 6,542#11
@proaject · 5,912#12
@freelancer_job · 70,929#13
@FreelancerH · 30,135#14
@donyayeproject · 81,808#15
@ketab_daneshgahi · 20,906#16
@projheh · 3,965#17
@unii_kar · 23,445#18
@Freelancersho_ir · 9,126#19
@tak_rezume · 5,813#20
@SevenProzhe · 35,042#21
@weproje · 35,442#22
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 189,428#23
@karynet · 15,727#24
@cproje · 30,601#25
@UniJobz · 16,483#26
@DailyProjects · 1,264#27
@ProjectsOrder · 4,744#28
@AloFreelancer · 34,573#29
@modiriat_2020 · 1,785#30
@takestekhdam · 7,495#31
@FreelancerEN · 36,414#32
@doorkaari · 29,732#33
@ful_jab · 18,711#34
@AloJobs · 32,977#35
@ketab_daneshjoyi · 26,586#36
@graphic_karyabi · 1,161#37
@KARYABI_MAJARAJOO_W · 7,965#38
@freelancer_booth · 42,249#39
@Donyayejozveh · 54,867#40
@jozve_hale_tamrin20 · 7,312#41
@ketabkhaneh_daneshjoyi · 100,863#42
@avasam_edu · 1,322 (as read 25 September 2026)#43
@karyabi_dorkar · 8,836#44
@jobfinder2021 · 1,518#45
@best_projectt · 18,252#46
@tarjjommee · 22,849#47
@wikileak · 15,431#48
@workinja · 6,476#49
@project_bartarr · 28,625#50
@PythonForever · 131,891#51
@projectUr · 8,589#52
@everythingforapply · 18,842#53
@Freelaancing · 30,237#54
@DevYara · 10#55
@amozesh_daneshjo · 117,857#56
@ipschannel · 84,356#57
@markaz_uni · 13,569#58
@Python4all_pro · 24,030#59
@DevelopixPython · 7,566#60
@Amozesh_admini173 · 2,607#61
@projjehdotcom · 2,592#62
@max_academy · 69,749#63
@ketabkhaneh_daneshjoyan · 110,199#64
@Dorkari11 · 2,740#65
@proojehforsat · 9,960#66
@callegiates · 15,448#67
@kheili_azad · 20,591#68
@cafejoo · 21,250#69
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,794#70
@Wiinners_Club · 1,512#71
@Fox_Poroxy · 4,827#72
@MyComputeri · 14,728#73
@Proxysarver · 32,824#74
@cofeeng · 112,528#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ful_jab · 18,711
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 October 2026
@everythingforapply · 18,842
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 October 2026
@project_bartarr · 28,625
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
@danshjo_bartar · 95,336
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@job_freelancer · 31,937
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@donyayeproject · 81,808
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
@tarjjommee · 22,849
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
@ketab_daneshjoyi · 26,586
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
@unii_kar · 23,445
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
@ketab_daneshgahi · 20,906
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
@TH_Shomal · 29,464
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
@eng_asan · 18,739
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 October 2026
@Proxysarver · 32,824
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
@tephd6 · 43,862
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@Collegian_Projection · 32,191
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
@Daneshjoo_Com · 46,843
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 August 2026
@amozesh_daneshjo · 117,857
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@PDFDANESHGHAHY · 37,111
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@havin_hosseiny · 50,298
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
@Donyayejozveh · 54,867
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@Jozve_Com · 39,524
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@paparatzi7 · 25,591
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JobFinder l کاریاب” (@shoghl_yaby), 20,939 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoghl_yaby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.