2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 12:39
135
no change
9 Aug 2026, 01:16
135
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
73.7%
avg views ÷ 135 subscribers
Avg views / post
99.5
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
7 (11 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
597
Reactions total
112
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5231261065492313328
47
36.4%
custom 5238180438194797504
27
20.9%
custom 5323401647433487048
24
18.6%
custom 5323329466213109342
21
16.3%
custom 5264782275920281661
5
3.88%
custom 5323456403971543549
5
3.88%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Санёчек стал граммофоном, граммофонами становятся около сотни Санёчков ежедневно!! Не будьте равнодушны, почешите ему щечку!
п.с. Фото с санечком ждёт вас в комментариях
#картинки 🥰
Если вы вдруг забыли (то вспомните хахах), я стараюсь помогать бездомным животным и на этот раз предложение у меня следующее.
Моя коллега пристраивает котеночка по имени Электрон, это мальчик и ему 4 месяца. Парень полностью здоров и проверен на инфекции, сейчас находится на передержке. Электрик высшей категории. Квалифицированный специалист.
Почему он крутой, спросите вы, а я скажу.
Комплектация: черный матовый но…
Други, мне сложно в это поверить, но вчера Пупуне исполнилось целых три года и теперь ее можно назвать реально взрослой !! ☺️
Представляете уже 3 года она радует меня и людей вокруг своей глупенькостью и природным очарованием. В честь Пупкиного праздника я собрала подборку с своими рисунками.
Спасибо за вдохновение и ментальную ежедневную поддержку, Пупок!! Цвети и пусть твое пузико всегда будет сыто! 🍀🌟🌟
#картинки
part.1 🌟
🌟🌟🌟🌟
По мере готовности буду публиковать наброски, накопленные за практику, и немного фото/видео, чтобы получить такой своего рода виртуальный дневничок на память ✍️
——-
П.с. А чего вы слезки льете.. ребеночка только взвешивали и потом отпустили сразу
#картинки #наброски
Переживаю один из сильнейших за этот год творческих кризисов. Делиться ничем не хочется, самокритика выше, чем обычно. Учебная практика доедает мои кончившиеся силы (да, у меня все еще не каникулы)
Посему, летающая голова арабской лошади для души
🌟🌟🌟🌟
#картинки
У моей булочки,Чоко, в прошлом месяце был день рождения. Я, конечно, бессовестно не успела в сроки, но зато я рада тому, что вышло ☺️
#картинки #помощьчоко
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @shnobus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 875,294 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✿ шнобус ✿” (@shnobus), 135 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shnobus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.