Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психиатрия от Шмиловича

Channel

Психиатрия от Шмиловича

@shmilovich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

16,035subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624014179
TypeChannel
Username@shmilovich
DescriptionКанал психиатра, доктора медицинских наук, основателя психиатрической Клиники «Ре-Альт» в Москве - https://clck.ru/3RqoSm Записаться на прием: 📱+7(495)432-16-62 🫂 @Clinic_ReAlt #TXFJT https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b831b40bcc8f520fb86657
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shmilovich

Growth

16,03216,06416,0486 August 2026 — 16,064 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,062 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,061 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,059 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,053 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,041 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,043 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,041 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,048 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,041 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,032 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,035 subscribers16,0356 August 202619 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 13 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,027–16,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 05:5216,035+3
18 Aug 2026, 08:0216,032-9
15 Aug 2026, 18:1216,041-7
14 Aug 2026, 09:3716,048+7
13 Aug 2026, 02:0516,041-2
11 Aug 2026, 23:3316,043+2
11 Aug 2026, 00:1116,041-12
9 Aug 2026, 20:5216,053-6
8 Aug 2026, 23:1016,059-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:5816,061-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:4116,062-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:1816,064first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.66%
avg views ÷ 16,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held22 (27 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total34,068
Reactions total449
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
570
Videos
68
Links
539

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27064.1%
👍7317.3%
🔥5513.1%
❤‍🔥143.33%
🙏40.95%
👏30.713%
💯10.238%
🥰10.238%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 22 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shmilovich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC760 views19 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026

Могут ли антидепрессанты сделать человека «овощем»? Пожалуй, один из самых частых страхов, который психиатры слышат от пациентов перед началом медикаментозного лечения. Но действие психофармакотерапии устроено гораздо сложнее, чем схема «выпил таблетку – изменился как человек». 🔥 В новом видео Андрей Аркадьевич Шмилович, врач-психиатр, доктор медицинских наук и основатель Клиники «Ре-Альт», подробно разбирает, как

14🔥3👍2

17 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC958 views20 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026

С какими состояниями можно обратиться в Клинику «Ре-Альт»? Иногда человек точно знает свой диагноз и ищет специалиста, который сможет продолжить лечение. А иногда никакого диагноза нет – есть только симптомы. Например, тревога, бессонница, апатия, резкие перепады настроения, навязчивые мысли, приступы страха или изменения в поведении, которым сложно найти объяснение. ❗ В Клинику «Ре-Альт» можно обратиться и в том,

12👍5🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,010 views15 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Азбука психического здоровья: буква «Я» – Ятрогения Продолжаем нашу воскресную рубрику, где простыми словами объясняем сложные термины из психиатрии и психологии. «Вчера я была на приеме у терапевта. Он посмотрел мои анализы, нахмурился и сказал: "М-да, это может быть очень серьезно. Придется вас обследовать". Он не сказал, что именно, не объяснил, просто нахмурился и пообещал, что вызовет. Я не спала всю ночь, пре

15

13 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,430 views14 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Большая конференция для специалистов в области психического здоровья! Мы знаем, что нас читают не только наши пациенты, но и коллеги: психологи, клинические психологи, психиатры, психотерапевты, врачи других специальностей и студенты профильных направлений. И сегодня обращаемся именно к вам! 🔥 22 августа приглашаем провести целый профессиональный день вместе с А.А. Шмиловичем и командой Академии психиатрии на ново

10🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,570 views22 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026

Можно ли поставить психиатрический диагноз за один прием? ◽️ Вот такой хороший вопрос мы получили под одним из наших постов. И он действительно важный, потому что ожидания от первой консультации у пациентов бывают очень разными. Иногда диагноз удается определить уже на первой встрече. Если симптомы достаточно типичны, врач видит понятную историю их развития и не находит признаков других состояний, которые могут дав

11🔥8👍2🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,320 views2 reactionsread 19 August 2026

По поводу приема. В вашей клинике за сколько приемов психиатр опред с диагнозом? По какой мкб диагностика? Что на приеме ?то есть как ведется?

2

11 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,480 views20 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Может ли диагноз разрушить карьеру? Продолжаем разбирать страхи и мифы, из-за которых люди откладывают психиатрическую помощь. Недавно мы увидели такой вопрос ◽️ Страх понятен, но здесь важно отделить сам факт обращения к психиатру от профессиональных ограничений, которые действительно существуют для отдельных видов деятельности. ◽️ Консультация психиатра и установленный диагноз не становятся общедоступной информ

16❤‍🔥3🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,480 views24 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026
Photo

«Боюсь идти к психиатру. Вдруг меня признают опасной и заберут ребенка?» Этот страх удерживает многих родителей от обращения за помощью. Человек может месяцами жить с депрессией, тревогой, паническими атаками или бессонницей, потому что боится последствий для семьи. Разберемся, что на самом деле говорит российское законодательство. ❗ Сам по себе визит к психиатру, психиатрический диагноз или лечение не являются ос

👍1110🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,530 views26 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Азбука психического здоровья: буква «Э» – Эндогенная депрессия Продолжаем рубрику, в которой разбираем психиатрические термины простым языком. «У меня хорошая семья. Есть работа. Ничего страшного не произошло. Тогда почему каждое утро кажется, что жить стало невозможно?» ◽️ Этот вопрос психиатры слышат очень часто. Мы привыкли искать причину любого состояния: если человеку плохо, значит, должно было что-то случить

20👍6

8 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,560 views20 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Как поддержать близкого с депрессией и не навредить? Когда у близкого человека депрессия, тяжело становится не только ему. Родные тоже оказываются в ситуации, к которой никто не готовил. Хочется подобрать правильные слова, поддержать, помочь быстрее выбраться из этого состояния. Но именно здесь чаще всего совершаются ошибки. → Фразы вроде «возьми себя в руки», «отвлекись», «подумай о хорошем» или «другим еще хуже

20

7 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,600 views20 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Можно ли определить у себя депрессию по тесту Бека? ◽️ Шкала Бека – один из самых известных и наиболее изученных психологических опросников в мире. Ее автор, психиатр и психотерапевт Аарон Бек, один из основателей когнитивной психотерапии, описал характерную для депрессии триаду мышления: • негативное представление о себе; • негативное восприятие окружающего мира; • убежденность, что будущее не принесет ничего хоро

13👍4🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,720 views21 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026
Voice message

К какому специалисту обратиться, если есть подозрения на депрессию? Многие люди откладывают обращение за помощью на недели, а иногда и на месяцы, потому что не понимают, кто им нужен: психолог, психотерапевт или психиатр. ◽️ Кто-то идет к психологу, хотя уже нуждается в медицинской помощи. Кто-то, наоборот, боится психиатра и пытается справиться самостоятельно, несмотря на то, что состояние становится тяжелее. На

👍11❤‍🔥5🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @shmilovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@shmilovich edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 372,424 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психиатрия от Шмиловича” (@shmilovich), 16,035 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shmilovich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.