Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

반골의 기질

@shkbomber

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,562subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002210227211
TypeChannel
Username@shkbomber
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shkbomber

Growth

1,5621,5631,562.57 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,562 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,562–1,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:111,562-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:311,563no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:331,563first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.2%
avg views ÷ 1,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
878
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total16,680
Reactions total251
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

251 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁11746.6%
👍10742.6%
🤣72.79%
🔥62.39%
🙏51.99%
👌41.59%
😭31.20%
🤔20.797%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC558 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

아무리 신뢰하는 애널의 글이라도 항상 챌린지하면서 읽어야하는데 이번엔 다 공감됨

👌2

7 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC571 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

재성이형은 아닐땐 지금 사지 말라하는 애널임

🤔2

7 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC563 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @energy_youn

[하나/에너지화학/윤재성] 에너지: OSP의 구조적 약세는 정유업 가치 재평가 요인 ▶ 보고서: https://bit.ly/4bzKMwk ▶ 9월 OSP 역대급 할인 - 9월 OSP -2$로 결정. 약 6년 래 최저 - 사우디가 OSP를 (-) 설정하는 경우는 1) 수요 측면에서 역대급 위기가 발생할 때. 2020년 5월 코로나 -7.3$, 2008년 12월 금융위기 -1.25$이 대표적이며 지속 기간은 3~4개월 2) 강력한 경쟁자의 등장으로 M/S를 빼앗길 위기에 처했을 때. 2014년 10월 OSP는 -0.05$로 시작해 (-) 약 3년 간 유지. 최저점 -2.3$. 2015년 미국이 원유 수출을 허용하며 경쟁자로 등장하자 M/S를 지키기 위한 선택 - 이번 9월 OSP -2$는 코로나를 제

7 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC705 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.07 18:11:26 기업명: 다원시스(시가총액: 966억) A068240 보고서명: 기타시장안내 (공시위반제재금 미납에 따른 가중벌점 부과) 제목 : (주)다원시스 공시위반제재금 미납에 따른 가중벌점 부과 동사는 불성실공시법인으로 지정('26.06.30)되어 벌점 24.5점 및 공시위반 제재금(추가부과) 5,000만원을 부과받았으나 납부기한('26.07.29)내 동 제재금을 미납하였고, 이후 '26.08.07까지 납부할 것을 최고하였으나, 동 기한내에도 제재금을 미납함에 따라 다음과 같이 가중벌점이 부과됨을 알려드립니다. 1. 대상종목 : (주)다원시스 2. 부과사유 : 공시위반제재금 미납에 따른 가중벌점 부과 3. 가중벌점 : 15.0점(5,000만원/400만원*1.2) 4. 가중벌점부과일 : 2

7 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC≈2,010 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

삼천당제약은 SK하이닉스를 응원합니다.

😁46🔥3🙏3

6 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC918 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1. 우리나라 정유사들은 시황 좋다고 자랑하면 횡재세 및 서민고혈프레임 폭격을 맞기때문에 돈 자랑을 못함. 그래서 해외 정유사 전망을 참고해야함. 2. 제품가가 별로 안빠지고 있기 때문에 원유가가 적당히 빠지는건 오히려 좋은 상황 3. 유가가 하향 안정화되면 주유소 가격 상한제가 중단될 것. 각 정유사마다 수천억 이익개선이 달린일이라 주가 상방을 열어버릴 이벤트가 될 수 있음. 4. 반도체처럼 역사적으로 돈을 많이 벌고 있는데 아무도 관심이 없음. 5. 어차피 주도주도 안보이는데 이런 혼탁한 장세에 매우 신선한 섹터.

👍10

6 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC877 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @energy_youn

*Phillips 66, 2Q26 어닝콜에서 이란 전쟁에 따른 공급 차질 영향이 2027년까지 휘발유와 디젤 시장에 지속될 전망이라 밝혀 - 마케팅/커머셜 부문 총괄 Brian Mandell, "정제 시황(Fundamentals)은 매우 타이트하며 시간이 갈수록 더욱 심화되고 있어. 이 같은 환경은 올해 3분기는 물론, 어쩌면 내년까지도 높은 정제마진을 유지할 수 있는 기반이 될 것 - 아울러 현재 중동과 아시아에서 약 700만 b/d, 러시아에서 추가로 140만 b/d 규모의 석유제품 공급이 부족한 상황이라 설명 **현재 회사가 정제하는 원유 가운데 중동산 비중은 1% 미만이라 설명. 이란 전쟁 이후, 미국산 경질유를 동부 연안 정유공장으로 공급해 기존 수입 원유를 대체했기 때문 ***Mandell은 현재 많은 정유사들

6 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC854 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/GZn-m6QEF3o?si=K6aulMrRklvAbX1n

😁3

6 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC843 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

잘되면 경쟁업체가 아니라 하청업체쪽일거 같은데.. 근데 슈퍼을

😁14👍5😭3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shkbomber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 694,868 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“반골의 기질” (@shkbomber), 1,562 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shkbomber.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.