•°❤️🦋❤️°• #mtllart
custom 54540900848422506054

Channel
@shkafx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002263993461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shkafx |
| Description | Cr: @karkacho_wha Рисуночки всякие. Щп переодически |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shkafx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 144 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 144 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,595 |
| Reactions total | 222 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
222 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5251218099184608448 | 43 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5262921739037346969 | 42 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5253547582071776552 | 19 | 8.56% | |
| custom 5195432340934925888 | 17 | 7.66% | |
| custom 5454276443473223217 | 17 | 7.66% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 7.66% | |
| custom 5251401610252265750 | 16 | 7.21% | |
| custom 5454090084842250605 | 13 | 5.86% | |
| custom 5454122043693898213 | 12 | 5.41% | |
| custom 5251751525532836956 | 9 | 4.05% | |
| 🍌 | 8 | 3.60% | |
| 🎃 | 6 | 2.70% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 1.35% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
•°❤️🦋❤️°• #mtllart
custom 54540900848422506054
Замечательные арты от @taantara и @kopstatter 🥺
custom 526292173903734696910custom 54542764434732232177custom 54541220436938982134custom 54540900848422506052
ФЭМИЛИ🦋💌🍎
custom 54540900848422506055custom 54541220436938982135custom 54542764434732232175
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 🦋 Поздравительные эмодзики ко Дню Рождения нашей офигенной Симочки! 🦋 🦋 Единственная и неповторимая, творческая и разносторонняя ШКАФИ! Пускай все твои желания сбываются – а мы все тебя поздравляем и очень сильно любим! 🦋💌🍎 #sk_art | #WeLoveSima
custom 54542764434732232175custom 54541220436938982133custom 52535475820717765522custom 54540900848422506052custom 51954323409349258881custom 52629217390373469691
У меня сегодня день рождения! Безумно благодарна каждому, кто продолжает следить за развитием канала! Вы лапочки, каждого зацеловать🫂 Ну и традиционный подарок для художника — репост его работ💐 Хихишечка →😮
custom 525121809918460844823custom 519543234093492588816custom 526292173903734696916💘4❤2🎃1custom 52535475820717765521
Золотое трио ввиде барашков🌟
custom 52535475820717765524🍌2custom 52514016102522657502
Posted without readable text
custom 526292173903734696915custom 52517515255328369569custom 52535475820717765526🍌1🎃1custom 52512180991846084481
Пока ела суп, свела видашку Чето слишком много телодвижений уходит ради 6 секунд Отстой
custom 52514016102522657502🍌1
Posted without readable text
custom 525140161025226575012custom 52512180991846084489custom 52535475820717765526💘2🍌1🎃1
🥺
💘6🎃3
❌ Хлопковый бандит без очков❌❌ ❌ ━━━━━━━━》❈《 ━━━━━━━❌❌❌ ✤⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✤❌❌❌ — Реквест из щп🍅 ♣️ #почирикашки
custom 52512180991846084486🍌1
Шанс того что Геля согласится рисовать Казьминского Иуду очень мал, но никогда не равен нулю
custom 52512180991846084484
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @shkafx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 16,953 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шкаф” (@shkafx), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shkafx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.