休息好了,今日可约
🔥2

Channel
@shixiaoqi52000
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,411subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003953273723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shixiaoqi52000 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 19 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shixiaoqi52000 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 1,411 | -79 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 1,490 | -21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 1,511 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 1,504 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 1,495 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 1,493 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 1,490 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,483 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 1,483 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
休息好了,今日可约
🔥2
号外 号外今天开始上班啦🥤
休假了,下个月见
排满
还两个空位
上最后一天,明天开始休息
【时间】:2026-07-26 【老师】:十柒 【留名】:无底洞(i贤者) 【费用】:1200p 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9.5 【颜值】:9.0 【身材】:9.5 【服务】:9.0 【态度】:10.0 【环境】:9.0 【综合】:9.33 【过程】:休息天闲来无事,打了一下午游戏有些累了,看到老师在线,便询问是否有空,正好现在空闲便马上穿衣前往,找过十柒妹妹好几次,也算是轻车熟路了,熟悉的小区,熟悉的停车位,指引上楼,老师还是一如既往的可爱,笑起来很好看,进门递水然后坐沙发休息聊天,因为后面没什么人,也不着急开始,闲聊了最近的趣事,期间老师也是对我上下其手,摸来摸去的,还露出了猥琐且邪恶的微笑,仿佛我是老师她才是狼友,差不多了便脱衣去洗澡,留了心眼这次让老师走在前面,因为上次被老师咸猪手了,虽然已经非常相熟了,老师还是依旧全程帮洗,洗完还帮擦干,服务很到位,这点很不错,洗完后上床开始了服务,还是熟悉的嫩妹三件套,虽然服务…
❤1
开课 (今日敬业版)
🔥1
排满了
开课,可约
还上一个礼拜,下个月要回家一趟
📖杭州大学专用报告📖 https://t.me/hz_dx 【课程评价】:#好评 【老师花名】:#十柒 【联系方式:@omidasadi123 【课时费用】:12p 【老师类型】:#萝莉 【验证留名】: 乌萨奇 【验证时间】:2026-7-21 【课室位置】:#萧山 【课程服务】: ▪️互舔 ▪️舌吻 ▪️深喉 【人照相似】:一致 【身高体重】:158/45 【肤色罩杯】: 【纹身数量】:小纹身 【课室卫生】:整体环境整洁/没有一次性拖鞋/有一次性浴巾 【个人卫生】:抽烟/没有准备漱口水 【服务态度】:无鸽子/无罚站/无下菜 【详情反馈】: #老师缺点 详见下文 #老师优点 详见下文 #情绪价值 详见下文 #出击体验与流程总结 本人是不爱写这种评论文的,奈何老师的感觉让我太好。想给老师一个大大好评。 一开始在大学里挑选老师,看到这位老师价格有点小贵,但是又看到老师07年的(本人是绝对的颜值控,一点不满意转身就会走的),想到一分钱…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shixiaoqi52000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“十柒 后宫” (@shixiaoqi52000), 1,411 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shixiaoqi52000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.