Channel
@shiwu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
506subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001293422376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shiwu |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shiwu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 506 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 532 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 532 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (22 September 2025 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 291 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
25 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 60.0% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
公子事物处📢📣 pinned «V系列 V6娱乐待遇 V8娱乐待遇 Vs娱乐待遇 v集团旗下Dd 德州注册链接 拉菲系列 焦点待遇 辉达待遇 益达待遇 泰达待遇 赢咖系列 盛煌待遇 耀世待遇 极悦待遇 恒盛待遇 集团能量公群 新币能量公群上押8888u 达利园能量公群上押28888u Vs德州俱乐部上押公群: 币安担保20000u德州俱乐部 达利园担保28888u德州俱乐部 Okgame担保88888德州俱乐部 Wpk德州俱乐部上押公群: 新币担保20wu德州俱乐部 V8转账游戏公群: https://t.me/+QRRGMmIcWVw2ODY1…»
V系列 V6娱乐待遇 V8娱乐待遇 Vs娱乐待遇 v集团旗下Dd 德州注册链接 拉菲系列 焦点待遇 辉达待遇 益达待遇 泰达待遇 赢咖系列 盛煌待遇 耀世待遇 极悦待遇 恒盛待遇 集团能量公群 新币能量公群上押8888u 达利园能量公群上押28888u Vs德州俱乐部上押公群: 币安担保20000u德州俱乐部 达利园担保28888u德州俱乐部 Okgame担保88888德州俱乐部 Wpk德州俱乐部上押公群: 新币担保20wu德州俱乐部 V8转账游戏公群: https://t.me/+QRRGMmIcWVw2ODY1 公子事物频道:@shiwu 公子本人:@gongzi
【泰达】待遇简介 A模式： 奖金号：1900～2000 工资：0.75％～1.25％ 彩票月分红：35％ 彩票半月占成：20％ （可自由参与高频彩或低频彩） B模式： 奖金号：1900～2000 工资：0.95％～1.45％ 彩票半月占成：50％ （招商以下最高签订40％） AB模式同步待遇： 招商月排名奖励：前10名 代理半月排名奖励：前20名 娱乐月分红：50％（不累计） 娱乐半月占成：20％ 电子工资：1.50％ 月中公布详细待遇
❤1
公子事物处📢📣 pinned a photo
V系列旗下滴滴德州正式上线 注册链接: https://download.bdetg.com/?label=mgsa1202d4 官方网站:ddpk.com
世界杯收单 本人坐庄，赔率分红你自己提
❗v8平台维护通知❗ 北京时间 2026-5-11 05:00 开始，平台维护，预计维护 2小时 左右。 维护期间，全平台停服，投注，派彩，提款，也会暂停。 前端页面打开会显示维护公告，敬请谅解
三十年来公与候，纵使做梦也风流
❤5
公子事物处📢📣 pinned a photo
通知：vs 招商押金提升至2000u 4/20 14：00 开放注册（不删档公测） 4/21 10：00 正式开业（开放充提）
❤1
公子事物处📢📣 pinned «V系列 V6娱乐待遇 V8娱乐待遇 Vs娱乐待遇 新币哈希待遇 新币哈希筹备中 拉菲系列 焦点待遇 辉达待遇 益达待遇 赢咖系列 盛煌待遇 耀世待遇 极悦待遇 恒盛待遇 集团能量公群 新币能量公群上押3600u 新币能量公群上押8888u 币安能量公群上押10000u 达利园能量公群上押28888u 公子事物频道:@shiwu 公子本人:@gongzi»
V系列 V6娱乐待遇 V8娱乐待遇 Vs娱乐待遇 新币哈希待遇 新币哈希筹备中 拉菲系列 焦点待遇 辉达待遇 益达待遇 赢咖系列 盛煌待遇 耀世待遇 极悦待遇 恒盛待遇 集团能量公群 新币能量公群上押3600u 新币能量公群上押8888u 币安能量公群上押10000u 达利园能量公群上押28888u 公子事物频道:@shiwu 公子本人:@gongzi
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shiwu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 85,584 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“公子事物处📢📣” (@shiwu), 506 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shiwu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.