Channel
@shitpostconfesslon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
163subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003965970713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shitpostconfesslon |
| Description | for takes @shitpostconfession_bot start . 21.06.26 ^_^ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shitpostconfesslon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 163 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 163 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,550 |
| Reactions total | 266 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
266 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 92 | 34.6% | |
| custom 5440876222819099376 | 73 | 27.4% | |
| custom 5193083440500600588 | 51 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5244596728493006837 | 46 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5192654948793347294 | 4 | 1.50% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
черт, меня так достало, что вот ЕСТЬ ИДЕЯ ДЛЯ ЩП, но ты ищешь ищешь, что тебе надо и ничего не находишь, то расстраиваешься и уже не хочешь делать этот щп. как находишь то, что ты хочешь блин..🌅 #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃3custom 51930834405006005883custom 54408762228190993762
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
что делать если уже довольно долгое время мои щп не набирают больше 200-300 просмотров,я активничаю в тик токе и выкладываю ежедневно щп,но ничего не меняется,даже в поддержку писала а там говорят мол "взаимодействуйте с другими авторами,комментыруйте и тд"хотя я это всё делаю,стоит ли открывать новый акк? Кто-то сталкивался с такой ситуацией? #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃4custom 54408762228190993763custom 51930834405006005882
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
Как вы вообще в первый раз пришли к щп и к ведению аккаунта в это русло? Может, вы поделитесь своим опытом? Я давно мечтала создавать щп, делиться мыслями, и возможно, найти людей разделяющих их. В жизни мне трудно добиться понимания от других людей, часто мои мысли и чувства оставались непонятыми, поэтому я думала,если начну делиться ими через щитпосты, я смогу найти то, что мне нужно? Наверное, единственное,что мен…
☃5custom 54408762228190993764custom 51930834405006005883
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
Расскажите о своем негативном опыте во всяких щп чатах?.. ну вот эти которые «здравствуйте не желаете ли вступить в наш щп чат». вам писали такие? че там вообще происходит #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃5custom 51930834405006005884custom 54408762228190993763
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
какие ваши любимые щитпостеры а какие НЕ любимые и почему 😽 #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃3custom 52445967284930068373custom 54408762228190993762custom 51930834405006005881
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
Почему у подслушано щпкм внезапно появилось оформление тейков окей, пускай делают что хотят, это просто странно и неожиданно было #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
custom 52445967284930068376
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
у вас не бывает такого желания иногда что хочется на вторых аккаунтах притвориться совершенно другой личностью с совершенно другим оформлением и совершенно другой манерой подачи контента общения и тд, хз типо это так интересно с одной стороны, с другой ты вряд ли будешь успевать и там и там #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
custom 54408762228190993767☃4custom 51930834405006005882custom 52445967284930068371
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
сколько времени у вас уходит на создание одного щп? #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃2custom 52445967284930068372custom 51930834405006005881custom 54408762228190993761
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
https://t.me/c/4374206900/8117 я уже чувствую как такие личности бы обиделись даже на это мнение и толпой обсасывали дня 3 #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
custom 51930834405006005886☃3custom 54408762228190993763custom 52445967284930068372
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
извините за разброс соо. это продолжение поста под номером 84 в ссылках. я бы так же хотела дополнить, что чем больше люди возмущаются в комм касаемо чьего то "ноунеймства" в интернете, особенно в контексте чьих то конфликтов, тем больше это обретает популярности засчет комментариев и это начинает реально раздуваться из мухи в слона. в таком случае даже если вас это надоедает, то всего можно... ... ... пролистнуть. п…
custom 54408762228190993765☃4custom 51930834405006005882custom 52445967284930068371
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
https://t.me/shitpostconfesslon/83 частично согласна с первым комм про "а как еще реагировать, если реально не знаешь этого автора?". только вот говорить "нн про нн" это глупо. мне кажется до таких людей просто не доходит, что они не потенциальная аудитория того или иного видео. называть незнакомых авторов "нн" это странно, ведь для кого то этот "нн" может быть объектом восхищения. #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃4custom 54408762228190993764custom 51930834405006005882custom 52445967284930068371
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
До чего докатилось щитпост комьюнити что адекватную/эстетичную её сторону принято клеймить ноунеймами или просто на каждый вброс о них в интернете говорить типо "это кто, опять нн говорят о нн" и так далее. Типо, бля, людям так нравится потреблять дерьмоконтент, что у них круг вот этот зрения дальше чб хенун кинни не расширяется никак. безнегатива 🤍 #тейк ✍️ @shitpostconfession_bot
☃8custom 54408762228190993765custom 51926549487933472944custom 52445967284930068373
Signed 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shitpostconfesslon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 839,922 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗍𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇” (@shitpostconfesslon), 163 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shitpostconfesslon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.