Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shiroishisama

Channel

Shiroishisama

@shiroishisama

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003500469776
TypeChannel
Username@shiroishisama
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 30 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shiroishisama

Growth

4448468 August 2026 — 44 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 September 2026 — 48 subscribers8 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 33 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 01:3948+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:4747+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:3144no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:4544first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀1736.2%
🥰1123.4%
❤‍🔥612.8%
510.6%
48.51%
🍾12.13%
👍12.13%
👎12.13%
🤯12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кто в танке, Ларпфыв и Ларпорка разосрались из-за опроса

❤‍🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC26 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

КТО ВЫИГРАЛ В КОЧФЛИКТЕ

  1. Широйши45%
  2. Ларпинт55%
  3. Ларпдяй9%
  4. Ларпсукер27%

The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026

Рот с мылом помой пожалуйста, выиграл Ларпдяй

10 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Короче итоги конфликта Я выиграла

🍾1

10 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC28 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Конфликт конфликтом, а манга будет по расписанию Появилась идея добавить Ларпорку Потихоньку буду делать референсы персонажей

👀5

9 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

На 50 подписчиков палю Имя и пятку

👀3🤯1

8 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Добавляйтесь в дэрэ, основу восстановить не получилось, поэтому вот вам мой новый дискордек

❤‍🔥3🥰2

8 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Когда зашли в рб и заскамили 333 детей (только запустили РБ)

❤‍🔥2👎1🥰1

8 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Тут олды знают, что я фанат Хэйлов, но т.к я ушла из фандома Ахсукер я перешла на Ларпхэйлов, поэтому да Хотите вообще шип арты по Ларптуберам? Пишите свои идеи

👀3🥰1

8 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC35 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

БАРНИ И ВУМЕНЫ КАК ВЫ ОТНОСИТЕСЬ К ЛАРПХЭЙЛАМ, ЛАРПРЕЙНАМ, ЛАРПКЕФФЕКТАМ И ЛАРПЖЕЛМАТАМ? (тут скорее вопрос к фанатам ахсукер, но я напишу расшифровку) Ларпхэйл - Шип СмейлЛарп и ХэлдЛарп Ларпрейн - Шип Кейларп и Ларв Ларпкеффект - Шип Кейларп и ЭффектЛарпа Ларпжелмат - Шип ЭффектЛарпа и СмейлЛарп

👀3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @shiroishisama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

КТО ВЫИГРАЛ В КОЧФЛИКТЕ

  1. Широйши45%
  2. Ларпинт55%
  3. Ларпдяй9%
  4. Ларпсукер27%

The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shiroishisama” (@shiroishisama), 48 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shiroishisama.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.