Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SHIHAB TECH PRO™🤑

@shihabtech1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

71,132subscribers

-453 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002469490963
TypeChannel
Username@shihabtech1
Description📱𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗖𝗢𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡:- @Shihab4404 📌 𝐋𝐞𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞. 👉👉 YouTube Channel 👇👇 https://youtube.com/@shihabtechpro4404?si=SCXYYAHY-XUFQvoC
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shihabtech1

Growth

71,10771,58571,3467 August 2026 — 71,585 subscribers7 August 2026 — 71,585 subscribers8 August 2026 — 71,496 subscribers10 August 2026 — 71,370 subscribers11 August 2026 — 71,277 subscribers12 August 2026 — 71,170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 71,107 subscribers14 August 2026 — 71,132 subscribers71,1327 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -453. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,035–71,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:0871,132+25
13 Aug 2026, 04:5971,107-63
12 Aug 2026, 06:1271,170-107
11 Aug 2026, 04:1271,277-93
10 Aug 2026, 00:5771,370-126
8 Aug 2026, 21:3271,496-89
7 Aug 2026, 19:0071,585no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:5471,585first reading

Engagement

104 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.40%
avg views ÷ 71,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.957%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
104
of 104 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held104 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total174,489
Reactions total1,670
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,030
Videos
270
Links
3,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 51s
Average length
5m 51s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,670 reactions across 102 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
93556.0%
🔥24314.6%
👍1096.53%
👏674.01%
😱543.23%
🎉402.40%
💯331.98%
🤪311.86%
🥰301.80%
👀281.68%
❤‍🔥171.02%
👎171.02%
😍100.599%
😐100.599%
🤩100.599%
😴70.419%
😡60.359%
😢50.299%
🌚40.24%
👨‍💻30.18%
6 further kinds110.659%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,670reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 102 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shihabtech1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 104 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC518 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Payment instantly ✅✅✅ Send unlimited 👍👍

9🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈1,040 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Send unlimited 5$ key 15$ par✅ 20$ key 32$ par✅ @Shihab4404

12👍3😱3👎1👏1

15 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC≈1,410 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Bybit Custom Event $25 Payment Distributed & Still Ongoing👀🔥

🔥62

14 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,630 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

100k$ Reward ~ 3 Day Left 👀🔥 ➡️Do Some Multiple : HERE End On 17 August 🛑🛑

14👍1👏1🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Instant 0.20$ Claim 🔥 https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cpos/355660849508578?r=AYQST5R7&l=en&uco=R109DxWymnkrwuoELBg4gg&uc=app_square_share_link&us=copylink Ans:- 找元元开返佣

🤪102👎2👏1😡1

14 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,540 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚠️Mars Airdrop Update এখানে যাদের ইউজারনেম আছে? তারা এই এডমিনকে মেসেজ দেন: @Deserve76 @tasinggff @AHMED_RABBI_6 @Shohel285 @NGT_HELPLINE @Tamimiqbal360 @shaidur45 not join grup @KajalKhan8955 not join grup @Manig87 @rxhridoy0017 @tony9119 @sajib198520 @raja5702 @Rdx260 @PUBGBOY7 @MdTuhin98 @Rahim_Badsha1 @faisalbhatti01 @Itsrocky11211 @Bisharat13 @abdur_rahim890 @fahimtake @bd_online_earnng এছাড়া যারা ফর্ম সাবমিট ক

4👍1👏1

14 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,440 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🔥Only 30 seconds work সবাই এটা করে রাখেন

5

14 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,460 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

👁Cero Early Access 🔥Claim Your Handle for all users ➡️Join Link- https://cero.finance/?ref=shihabtechpro ▶️Sing-Up With Email or Google ▶️ Choice Name & Claim ▶️Done

9👍3👏2🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,520 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Send unlimited 20$ key 31.5$ par✅ @Shihab4404

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @shihabtech1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTCAnonymous Poll403 voters

10$ Stake for 5 day Earn 4$ need this event??

  1. ✅Yes85%
  2. ❌No17%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTCAnonymous Poll258 voters

Kucoin new account make just complete kyc 30$ Future Bonus need?

  1. Yes✅65%
  2. No🚫37%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTCAnonymous Poll569 voters

এখন মার্কেটের অবস্থা অনেক খারাপ ছোট ছোট ইনকাম করা যাবে এমন অফার দিবো??

  1. Yes✅89%
  2. NO❌13%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 835,028 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SHIHAB TECH PRO™🤑” (@shihabtech1), 71,132 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shihabtech1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.