Channel
@shiba_slushaet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
223subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001611839266 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shiba_slushaet |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shiba_slushaet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 223 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 229 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 229 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 16 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
43 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 12 | 27.9% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 7 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@syndicate_gg Вы там на приколе с такими спонсорскими пакетами? Реклама, блять, на шпажках и наклейки на кальяны 🤦♂️ Что дальше? Предложите пиццу на которой из кизяков пепперони выложите название команды?
🤣7
Прибыли на афтепати и наблюдаем. Кто сорвет стикер — у того отвалится жопа
🫡2
Послушали доклады с умными мордами. Немного разочарованы, по впечатлениям тоже напишем.
❤3
А вот и свежие кусачки из чата Броконфа, некий @risingoctopus (Скрин переписки от его лица) закусился с Никитой Mango Proxy (@cutman3) из-за навязчивой рекламы Итоги неизвестны, так что просим тех, кто еще не уехал — отписать что и как. За качество извините, фоткали на тапок размера 45. А вы как относитесь к спаму?
😁1
Топ стендов мы кстати выбрали, и уже на днях будем ругать/хвалить партнёрки и организаторов. Посмотрим чем будут удивлять на афтепати.
Нам налили ещё ботов, не знаем снова ЕЮ или кому-то просто не понравился наш стикер на броконфе...
Doge team в здании 🫡
🫡3
Сегодня будем на @broconf захотите пообщаться — ищите админа, фото выше
❤2
Семпай @dumay_old заметил нас и решил помочь подписчиками Не хочется быть неблагодарными псинами, поэтому — Спасибо, дорогой ЕЮ.
😁3
Обзоры партнёрок пока пришлось отложить — дел пиздец, да и осенние простуды никто не отменял. НО Совсем скоро пройдёт BroConf, а что это значит? Всё верно, обзор на конфу от собачьей стаи, очень надеемся что обсёра как на Kinza в этом году не будет, а если вы забыли насколько был велик масштаб пиздеца — взгляните вот тут Тыкните реакцию, чтоб мы видели, что вы живы
🔥3
Осторожно: маняфантазии СНГ-партнерки! Заходит как-то крупная команда в бар в affstar и просит пощупать уже давно несвежий оффер. Кейс настолько беспалевно нарисован, что команда решила остаться анонимной. Ситуации соответствует и конченный заголовок "Пощупать с объемом командой". Щупали-щупали всей командой и нащупали профит. Какой-то странный арбитражный гэнг бэнг, короче 🤨
🤡4
Какой там рост у diasp.pro, если о них ничего не слышно? Ну ладно, поздравляем...
👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shiba_slushaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@shiba_slushaet named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shiba слушает...” (@shiba_slushaet), 223 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shiba_slushaet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.