Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 34 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 648–655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 01:40
649
-1
20 Oct 2026, 00:20
650
-3
13 Oct 2026, 23:00
653
-1
5 Oct 2026, 16:57
654
no change
30 Sept 2026, 08:22
654
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 17 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
209 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
86
41.1%
🔥
42
20.1%
🎉
21
10.0%
👍
17
8.13%
🤔
10
4.78%
👏
9
4.31%
🤣
8
3.83%
🙏
6
2.87%
🥰
5
2.39%
🤝
3
1.44%
🦄
2
0.957%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2025 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто тут у нас именинница? Верно! 🎂
На фото — тоже немного я. Хотя за этот год я поняла, что «я» — это гораздо больше, чем отражение в зеркале.
Этот год стал временем больших открытий. Самых важных — про саму себя. Оказалось, что внутри гораздо больше, чем я привыкла думать. Теперь учусь жить в гармонии с этой новой глубиной.
С днём рождения меня. Впереди — самое интересное. 🤍
Секрет Идеальных и пышных оладий - в том, чтобы ... их готовил лентяй! Если ваши блины недостаточно пышные - то это только потому что вы усердный человек!
Подробный рецепт оставила для тебя в описании.
Рецепт и веган, и классика с яйцом на кефире или молоке.
Сохраняй рецепт, чтобы не перетрудиться.
И драники съесть и ручки не измазать ! Готовы ? Тогда сейчас всё покажу!
Я – беларуска, и это – самый ленивый рецепт драников в мире. Картошкой клянусь!
Если вы подадите их со сметаной и будете есть с закрытыми глазами – даже коренной бульбаш не отличит!
И при этом – ни грязных рук ни очисток на кухне!
Так что бегите за мытым картофелем и не забудьте сохранить рецепт!
Главное, чтобы главные специалисты из "бульба…
Кулич 2025 года
И все секреты в комментариях
НО!
✅ Кратко для тех кому лень читать:
Масло и соль важно вводить в конце замеса
Слишком рано добавленная соль - замедляет и подавляет работу дрожжей , укрепляет клейковину рано клейковину и тесто в итоге - не тянется .
Рано добавленное масло - мешает формированию клейковины и опять мы получаем тяжелое не податливое тесто.
А подробнее - читайте в комментариях
Ни 1 из этих фото не существует.
Это всё вымысел нейронных сетей. И с учётом того, что дальше всё будет только улучшаться ( в плане качества) - мне сложно представить - что же останется от реальности в ближайшее время. Меня лично всё это технологическое развитие и восхищает и пугает одновременно!
Текст пишут нейронки, фото делают нейронки ...
Видео уже тоже можно сделать при помощи сетей.
От человеЧНОГО осталось лиш…
🤔10
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @shevchonok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ГОТОВИМ СО СВЕТЛАНОЙ 🧁 @foodbylana · 19,619 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shevchonok_” (@shevchonok), 649 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shevchonok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.