Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shestak.mov

Channel

Shestak.mov

@shestaknikolay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

886subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002096559583
TypeChannel
Username@shestaknikolay
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shestaknikolay

Growth

8869008937 August 2026 — 900 subscribers8 August 2026 — 900 subscribers16 August 2026 — 894 subscribers24 August 2026 — 887 subscribers1 September 2026 — 886 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 884–902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 07:15886-1
24 Aug 2026, 11:04887-7
16 Aug 2026, 05:27894-6
8 Aug 2026, 01:03900no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:50900first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 14s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9743.7%
5424.3%
👍167.21%
🤓146.31%
🍓135.86%
custom 521095630695275891073.15%
custom 534144116720665686373.15%
custom 588217004217021697673.15%
custom 534152308082292634452.25%
💩20.901%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shestaknikolay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC250 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🕷️А сегодня оказывается всемирный день Человека-паука...

🔥10custom 52109563069527589102custom 58821700421702169761

29 Jul 2026, 03:52 UTC375 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6

28 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC325 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7🔥3custom 52109563069527589101

16 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC546 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Забавно, что несколько часов пытался сделать непрерывные 30 секунд кадра. Сделал. Перфектно. Но как же этот труд обесценится, когда Seedance 2.5 со дня на день выпустит модель способную генерировать 30 секунд. 🍌

🔥8

16 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC546 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сделал полностью первую сцену фильма. Длительность - 2:25. Впереди ещё минут 10. Уже вижу что "кино не для всех"... )

🔥5custom 53414411672066568631

14 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC532 views14 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пригласил актера на эпизод в свой новый фильм. Оставляем?

🍓7custom 58821700421702169764🤓3

10 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC635 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Работы по новому фильму оказалось больше чем предполагал. А что бы не было скучно сделал себе питомца для ChatGPT. Узнал? В комментариях оставлю лист анимации, если захочешь, во вкладке "Work" можешь себе добавить такого же. ChatGPT выкатил обновление, теперь снова конкурирует с Клодом.

🔥72

9 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC534 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⚪️ Драфт закрыт. Честно — лучшее, что я писал для AI фильма. Впереди: 30 дней безостановочных генераций.

👍8🔥5custom 58821700421702169762

5 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC666 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☝️ Держу в курсе, как проходит процесс создания AI-фильма для ASTANA AI FILM FESTIVAL под кодовым названием «AFS-26». Вроде окончательно утвердился с идеей, сквозной темой и сверхзадачей фильма. Совесть — ведущая тема фильма. Полноценный сценарий я обычно не пишу, а работаю в стиле «экспрессионизма» )) Я знаю, чем начнётся и чем закончится фильм, у меня есть набор сцен, которые хочу видеть, а дальше тестирую рамки

12👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shestaknikolay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 659,549 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shestak.mov” (@shestaknikolay), 886 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shestaknikolay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.