Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SHERA’S WAY ✋🏾😛🤚🏾

Channel

SHERA’S WAY ✋🏾😛🤚🏾

@shereshkov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,563subscribers

-236 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001628433825
TypeChannel
Username@shereshkov
DescriptionДАННЫЙ КАНАЛ НЕСЁТ ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНО ЮМОРИСТИЧЕСКИЙ ХАРАКТЕР. АВТОР НЕ СТРЕМИТСЯ ОСКОРБИТЬ ИЛИ УНИЗИТЬ КОГО-ЛИБО, В ПОСТАХ ВОЗМОЖНО ПРИСУТСТВИЕ НЕНОРМАТИВНОЙ ЛЕКСИКИ. Контент 16+ inst shereshkovx
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/shereshkov

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,5639,9129,737.56 August 2026 — 9,799 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,799 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,798 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,790 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,773 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,761 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,854 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,904 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,912 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,842 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,846 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,790 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,743 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,694 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,624 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,657 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,663 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,640 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,620 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,633 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,619 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,606 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,598 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,583 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,590 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,563 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,511–9,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 11:509,563-27
5 Nov 2026, 19:379,590+7
3 Nov 2026, 05:099,583-15
31 Oct 2026, 03:179,598-8
27 Oct 2026, 21:519,606-13
24 Oct 2026, 16:269,619-14
21 Oct 2026, 08:469,633+13
18 Oct 2026, 12:279,620-20
15 Oct 2026, 04:369,640-23
11 Oct 2026, 20:229,663+6
4 Oct 2026, 22:369,657+33
25 Sept 2026, 13:189,624-70
17 Sept 2026, 10:399,694-49
13 Sept 2026, 12:409,743-47
9 Sept 2026, 09:169,790-56
4 Sept 2026, 11:189,846+4
1 Sept 2026, 07:159,842-70
29 Aug 2026, 05:039,912+8
25 Aug 2026, 23:469,904+50
22 Aug 2026, 22:259,854first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.5%
avg views ÷ 9,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,060
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held85 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total89,310
Reactions total3,563
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,670
Videos
≈267
Links
≈415

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,822 reactions across 83 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣5,61940.7%
😁3,86928.0%
❤1,59311.5%
🔥6834.94%
❤‍🔥4583.31%
🤡3862.79%
👏2261.64%
😢1411.02%
🫡1310.948%
🏆1210.875%
👍870.629%
🎉760.55%
💯650.47%
😭640.463%
🤔360.26%
🤝350.253%
😍330.239%
💘300.217%
💔290.21%
🍌210.152%
18 further kinds1190.861%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,822 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 83 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shereshkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 20:17 UTC≈1,290 views104 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Life’s good

❤85😁9😢6👍2💯2

10 Nov 2026, 20:17 UTC≈1,250 views33 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Их могать можно, я знаю!

❤21🤣7😁4💯1

10 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC≈1,410 views39 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

НУ ЧТО, МОГНЕМ СУХАРЕЙ??? ⚡️ ФК 10 ПРОТИВ «ДИНАМО» 15 ноября ФК 10 впервые встретится с московским «Динамо» в рамках БЕТСИТИ шоу-матча, где медиафутбол сойдётся лицом к лицу с футболом профессиональным! Звёздные гости, яркие активности, сюрпризы для болельщиков и, конечно, интригующее противостояние на поле 😘 😱 ФК 10 — «ДИНАМО» 🇷🇺 📆 15 ноября, вс ⏰ 14:00 🏟 ВТБ Арена 📍Ленинградский проспект, 36 ☁️ +1℃ 🎫 БИЛЕТ…

❤27😁6❤‍🔥5🤣1

10 Nov 2026, 12:25 UTC≈2,160 views88 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Эдик, ты что такое?

👏53😁23❤7🔥3🤔1🤮1

10 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTC≈2,290 views96 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣72❤14😁10

10 Nov 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,460 views175 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026
Photo

Говорит че вы жалуетесь? Каски надевайте, ничего болеть не будет, всем здоровья Космический, конечно, персонаж.

😁114🤣37❤13🤡4👍3💩2🤮2

8 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC≈3,090 views230 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Всем хорошего дня!

😁145🤣44❤26🖕8❤‍🔥3⚡2🤮2

7 Nov 2026, 19:56 UTC≈3,890 views336 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Ну и ладно! Все равно классный финал, всем спасибо за поддержку! 2д с победой, молодцы, че сказать - отправили в отпуск СКА и Литов)))) ну или кого там, не помню А мы красавцы вообще! Пойдите, сыграйте столько финалов!

😁193❤92👏38💩6🔥4👍3

5 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC≈4,710 views164 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Амкал все теперь, просто по городам? 😢

❤86😁34🤣25😭7🤡5🫡4💩3

4 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC≈7,680 views247 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣167❤39😁27🏆9😢3💘2

1 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC≈6,690 views248 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Так, там Мороз (имя снова забыл) предлагает пообщаться за жили-были в преддверии финала. Так вот, гражданин, с вами я готов разговаривать только на Столе, при понятых!

🤣200❤29😁16👏2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @shereshkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК 10 || ФК Десять || FC 10
@fc10fc10 · 25,604
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
SLONSKY🐘
@slonsky37 · 22,710
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Галерея Джея
@hijeygallery · 52,907
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
topolina
@topolina_13 · 23,987
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
ваш КРАП
@vashkrap · 25,903
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
13TEAM | Медиафутбол
@team1341 · 48,102
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
First&Red
@firstandred · 28,026
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Матч! Медиафутбол
@match_media · 36,482
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
WINLINE Media League
@WinlineML · 84,686
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Денис Дорохов
@DenisDorokhov1987 · 38,824
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SHERA’S WAY ✋🏾😛🤚🏾” (@shereshkov), 9,563 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shereshkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.