Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

дневник Шелл

@shellydiary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

481subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934676116
TypeChannel
Username@shellydiary
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shellydiary

Growth

481482481.58 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 482 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:41 — 481 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:319 Aug 2026, 01:41
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 481–482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:41481-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:31482first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,514 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
88258.3%
❤‍🔥20313.4%
💘1278.39%
785.15%
🥰664.36%
🤩362.38%
🔥301.98%
👍231.52%
🤯221.45%
🎉110.727%
💯90.594%
🕊60.396%
😇50.33%
😍40.264%
🍓30.198%
🍾20.132%
😐20.132%
🥴20.132%
👏10.066%
💋10.066%
1 further kind10.066%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,514reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2026, 18:11 UTC589 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С Пасхой ребят🔥

🥰3613💘2❤‍🔥1😐1

3 Apr 2026, 16:31 UTC755 views97 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Периодически я вспоминаю, что всё ещё художник

73❤‍🔥15🔥5💘2🗿1🥴1

22 Mar 2026, 14:35 UTC954 views83 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моя чибишная Шелл

57💘19❤‍🔥5🥴1😐1

22 Mar 2026, 14:34 UTC739 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Маленький коллаб с целой кучей крутых художников с розовыми маскотами. Даже забавно увидеть вживую насколько нас, розовых, много

💘207❤‍🔥2

22 Mar 2026, 14:33 UTC686 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Kynhy_memPhoto

<•.°[26 РОЗОВЫХ ГОЛОВУШЕК] °.•> •спасибо всем художникам которые согласились на участие этого супер супер крутого коллабика и спасибо что выбрали для своего маскота розовые волосы• (>_<) ^УЧАСТНИКИ ПРЕКРАСНОГО КОЛЛАБИКА^ ★ Авторы идеи и создатели этого коллаба : Карга - @Kynhy_mem Чами - @ChamomElf ☆Человек который рисовал фон и свою часть коллаба Avacado - @EvacadoWoop ★Крутые участники коллаба: Шмоня - художе

21💘3❤‍🔥2

8 Mar 2026, 17:34 UTC683 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Поздравляю с 8 марта, дорогие дамы. Это очень важный день для всех нас. Желаю всем крепкого здоровья❤️

63💘8❤‍🔥1

3 Mar 2026, 20:44 UTC829 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лето где то в наших мечтах, не расслабляйтесь. Лично у меня тупо армагедон из шторма, льда, потопа и снега на улице

71😇5💘3🔥21❤‍🔥1💋1🕊1

2 Mar 2026, 13:14 UTC847 views103 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давно я Шеллку не зарисовывала

71🔥12👍10😍4💘32🕊1

22 Feb 2026, 12:15 UTC966 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давно у меня не было персонажей с короткой стрижкой. Как то сложно мне дается рисование коротких волос. Вдохновлялась прической Винтер из эры Whiplash (aespa)

🤩3616🔥5👍3💘3

18 Feb 2026, 20:48 UTC912 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В месте, где я сейчас живу едва ли бывает пару грозовых дней на год, и это если честно крайне печально, потому что я очень люблю грозу. Иногда я просто включаю на телике 10 часов шума грома, потому что +вайб

5320💘12

14 Feb 2026, 12:16 UTC882 views104 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С 14 февраля, бэйбы 🌸

68💘22🥰131

8 Feb 2026, 16:26 UTC962 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

До полноценки я это доводить не буду так как это просто зарисовка дизайна персонажа, но выглядит симпатишно поэтому ловите

❤‍🔥5825💘13

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shellydiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,075,038 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дневник Шелл” (@shellydiary), 481 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shellydiary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.