Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шёл снег

Channel

Шёл снег

@shel_sneg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

364subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439017929
TypeChannel
Username@shel_sneg
Created4 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shel_sneg

Growth

3633653646 August 2026 — 363 subscribers7 August 2026 — 365 subscribers15 August 2026 — 364 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:36364-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:26365+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:18363first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.2%
avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
Avg views / post
168
1 post measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held13 (19 March 202625 July 2026)
Views total168
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520844182264428959712376.4%
custom 54386294567070759293823.6%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC168 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Заглядываю мир, в котором в школьную программу вместе с одним днем Ивана Денисовича будет включена Неделя как неделя Натальи Баранской. Все уже все написали про эту книгу, храни господь издательство Носорог и Машу Нестеренко.

custom 520844182264428959718custom 54386294567070759296

6 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC254 viewsread 6 August 2026

Этот текст, кстати, нам прислали на другой опенколл, но он нам так понравился, что под него мы сделали новый и назвали его названием рассказа ↓

6 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC299 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @flash_shtuki

Я хочу, чтобы хоронили одну мою ногу (левую), одну руку (правую), где захотят. Все остальное сжечь. Долго хранить прах, пока полеты в космос не станут по цене вафельницы, или микроволновки. Туда запустить больше всего праха. Со мной в гроб прошу положить голографическую картину с Иисусом, как он создает планету в космосе, ту картину, что стоит у меня на кухне. Потом сжечь грейпфрут, крабовые палочки, тыквенные семеч

custom 520844182264428959714

2 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC308 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @creative_svetaPhoto

кто где?

custom 52084418226442895977

28 Jun 2026, 11:07 UTC468 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Оксана Васякина делает больно по-другому (говоря, что литература не терпит слеш-карьеры, поплачу и пойду поработаю, чтобы заплатить за аренду)

custom 543862945670707592911

27 Jun 2026, 12:03 UTC375 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А в нашем португальске что происходит! Дуа Липовна открывает библиотеку запрещенных книг (так в заголовках, на самом деле — полка внутри ливрарии лелло, того самого книжного в Порту, в который не попасть без платного билетика). Но кроме шуток, я с удовольствием смотрю подборки и интервью в ее книжном клубе Service95. Вот ее интервью с Claire Keegan, с Оушеном Вуонгом или с Маргарет Этвуд, и мне нравится, что она нап

custom 520844182264428959720

19 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC297 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

простите за два анонса подряд, а курс уже завтра вообще-то стартует, и можно успеть спонтанно впрыгнуть к нам на разговор про все малое

custom 52084418226442895973custom 54386294567070759291

19 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC351 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wlagruPhoto

Завтра начинаются занятия курса «Флэш-фикшн» и мы попросили кураторку Анну Линскую сделать подборку коротких рассказов, чтобы те, кто никогда не слышал о формате, смогли понять, что это такое. Если вас вдохновили эти тексты и вы хотите попробовать писать так же, приходите на курс!

custom 52084418226442895977

28 May 2026, 11:57 UTC401 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wlagruPhoto

Анна Линская: У Кио Маклир в книге «Птицы, искусство, жизнь» есть глава, которая называется «малость» — о том, что можно довольствоваться малым, будь то птички-невелички или мелкотемье в искусстве, а также о дерзости стремиться к малому в эпоху грандиозных амбиций. Точно такой же подзаголовок мне хочется поставить и этому курсу. Стремиться к малому — это дерзко. Флэш-проза — это вызов для писательницы. Как написать

custom 52084418226442895979custom 54386294567070759296

20 May 2026, 20:06 UTC405 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ой, ребятишки, вчера купила четвертую часть солвей балле, сегодня придумала, как вставить в один готовящийся курс разбор и обсуждение on the calculation of volume, скрестили пальчики, что программу апрувят 🤞

custom 520844182264428959719

16 May 2026, 12:16 UTC503 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня прошла наша ежегодная мастерская выходного дня — про напряжение и саспенс. Начинаю свой рассказ всегда с легендарной сцены на заправке из птиц и (отдающей нездоровой склонностью к позиции силы) цитаты хичкока о том, что люди — это орган, берешь ноту, получаешь ужас, берешь другую, получаешь радость. В рифму к желанию подключаться напрямую к сознанию зрителя так, чтобы можно было просто: нажимать разные кнопки

custom 520844182264428959717custom 54386294567070759295

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @shel_sneg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,254,898 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шёл снег” (@shel_sneg), 364 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shel_sneg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.