Channel
@shegahq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
613subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001529967801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shegahq |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shegahq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 613 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 610 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 610 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,838 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 81.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“For us, people with disabilities, technology is not a luxury; it is something that can directly fulfill what we are missing.” — Tilahun Muniye, History Teacher and Inclusive Education Resource Person at Derartu Tulu #Shega #EdTechMondays #EdTechMondaysEthiopia #MastercardFoundation #Ethiopia
Join us today, July 27th, at 8:10 PM (EAT) on Fana Media Corporation's Facebook page for a conversation on Co-Authoring the Future: How Every Department Shapes Tech Adoption. This upcoming episode explores how technology adoption extends beyond the IT department and requires collaboration across every part of an organization. From legal and compliance to growth, partnerships, and product development, the discussion …
Ethiopia's financial inclusion conversation often focuses on access: more accounts, agents, and products. But our latest AKOFADA infographic highlights another gap: the skills and confidence to use these tools safely. A few numbers stood out: 92% understand inflation, but only 39% understand its impact on loan costs. Among internet users, 32% know how to block a lost or stolen phone, while nearly half reuse password…
“Infrastructure is a very important thing when it comes to EdTech. In this era of technology and AI, these gadgets or materials are not a luxury but a necessity.” — Biruk Mamo, Founder of Kuraztech and AynuLabs #Shega #EdTechMondays #EdTechMondaysEthiopia #MastercardFoundation #Ethiopia
This month's EdTech Community Gathering at Shega brought together educators, innovators, technology professionals, and policymakers to explore the future of digital education in Ethiopia. Centered on Ethiopia's Digital Strategy 2030, the event featured a presentation on eTemari, a personalized EdTech platform, followed by a keynote Q&A exploring the opportunities and challenges of Digital Ethiopia 2030 for the EdTec…
❤1
DFS Brief #3: Advancing Financial Inclusion in Ethiopia's Digital Economy This month's brief explores the ideas, innovations, and policy developments shaping Ethiopia's digital financial services ecosystem. What's inside: • DFS Glossary in Afan Oromoo • Digitalizing SACCOs to bridge the last mile of financial inclusion • Leveraging Edir for inclusive insurance services • Micro-transaction pricing models for greater…
Tomorrow, we're bringing together Ethiopia's EdTech community for our June Monthly Meetup. With the launch of Digital Ethiopia 2030, this session will explore what the country's new technology strategy means for education, entrepreneurs, and the broader EdTech ecosystem. Join us for an EdTech Spotlight presentation and panel discussion featuring experts working at the intersection of technology and education. 📅 Tue…
Join us this coming Monday, June 29th, at 8:10 PM (EAT) on Fana FM 98.1 and affiliated stations across the country for a conversation on The Unified Framework for Context-Relevant EdTech Integration. This upcoming episode explores how Ethiopia can move beyond simply introducing digital tools in classrooms toward building a practical, sustainable, and standards-driven approach to technology integration. From curricul…
❤1
In May's edition of #EdTechMondays Ethiopia, we explored a critical question for the future of education: how do we equip teachers and school leaders with the skills, data, and support needed to thrive in a digital-first learning environment? The discussion brought together educators, school leaders, EdTech practitioners, and policymakers to examine the realities of the EdTech value chain, from teacher competency an…
❤1
Happening now at Shega HQ! The latest DFS Mixer is bringing together leaders and practitioners from fintech, banking, development, entrepreneurship, and innovation to discuss the trends shaping Ethiopia's digital financial services ecosystem. Today's conversations will explore the future of digital finance in Ethiopia, SACCO digitalization, inclusive insurance through Edir, and community-based marketing strategies …
What if Ethiopia's biggest opportunity for financial inclusion has been hiding in plain sight, in a centuries-old institution most of us already belong to? Our latest AKOFADA case study, Leveraging Edir for Inclusive Insurance Services in Ethiopia, makes the case that Edir, Ethiopia's traditional community-based mutual-support system, is the country's most viable on-ramp to inclusive digital finance. The logic is: …
❤1
“Competition should be encouraged, as it drives innovation and technological growth. Government support through funding, partnerships, and policy frameworks can create an environment where competition and collaboration coexist.” — Ms. Eden Fikru, Product Manager at AIT Technology and Arif Education #Shega #EdTechMondays #EdTechMondaysEthiopia #MastercardFoundation #Ethiopia
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shegahq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 156,421 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shega” (@shegahq), 613 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shegahq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.