Channel

` @.𝖲ℌ𝖤𝖤𝖲𝖧 ˚⌑

@sheeshcvr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003952626794
Type	Channel
Username	@sheeshcvr
Created	Between 1 April 2026 and 10 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	10 August 2026
Last confirmed live	10 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/sheeshcvr

Growth

2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
10 Aug 2026, 02:02	66	no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:01	66	first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 36.1%; avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
Avg views / post: 23.8; 17 posts measured
Reaction rate: 12.5%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 17; of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held	19 (10 July 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total	405
Reactions total	15
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	10 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos: 70
Videos: 2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5339201530740372188	6	18.8%
custom 5339570730424102001	6	18.8%
custom 5247125841460090667	5	15.6%
custom 5355223639950133669	4	12.5%
custom 5293994229696061546	3	9.38%
custom 5339083646772997787	3	9.38%
custom 5336940226164061120	2	6.25%
custom 5339503007379779113	2	6.25%
custom 5355190916594306449	1	3.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Что бы вы хотели?🎁

Анон🎁23%
Кавер от участницы🎁23%
Кавер от группы🎁54%
Интерактив💎23%
Наша кнопочка:)🎁23%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 605,595 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

𝑲𝑰𝑵𝑫𝑬𝑹𝑺ᵍᵍ
@kinders_oi · 281 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝙃𝙖𝙞𝙮𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙨 🫦//𝟏𝟎𝟎% ℒ𝒶𝒹𝓎
@HAIYLARLS_OIGG · 482 posts 🌀 ʙɪᴛsᴀᴇ.ᴄᴠʀ 🌀
@bitsae_cvr · 271 post ᎪUᗪ/ Ꮆ۪rᧉׅყ'Ѕᧉׅ🩷
@greysy_cvr · 301 post 𝑲𝑰𝑵𝑫𝑬𝑹𝑺ᵍᵍ
@kinders_oi · 281 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

[꿈] ໒ 𝕭𝕬𝐁𝐘 ᴅʀᴇᴀᴍ°₊ ❤️🖤
@BabyDream_oi · 211 post 𝙃𝙖𝙞𝙮𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙨 🫦//𝟏𝟎𝟎% ℒ𝒶𝒹𝓎
@HAIYLARLS_OIGG · 481 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“` @.𝖲ℌ𝖤𝖤𝖲𝖧 ˚⌑” (@sheeshcvr), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheeshcvr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.