Channel
@she_wasgenius
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
295subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002109092054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @she_wasgenius |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/she_wasgenius |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 295 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 296 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
309 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5391244907891407289 | 82 | 26.5% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5265101864436792830 | 61 | 19.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 43 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5391224094479890064 | 25 | 8.09% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 6.15% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 3.24% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.324% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.324% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩Завершила работу на холсте! Получилось возможно не то что я ожидала, от изначальной идеи остался сам концепт парня с крылышками и голубые абстрактные формы🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Но тем не менее, я довольна проделанной работой, в комм выложу скетч с планшета #full #traditional
❤9custom 53912449078914072896custom 52651018644367928303custom 53912240944798900642🍓1🤔1
🪩➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Рисую эскиз, для еще одной работы на холсте В комментариях, можете предположить какая тематика будет ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿👾 #sketch
🔥9❤5custom 52651018644367928304custom 53912240944798900643
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🪩Продолжаю калякать акрилом 💿На самом деле немного не довольна, тем что все не супер ровно ведь в диджетале, я могла это выровнять и сделать по другому, но с другой стороны стремится ко всему сверх ровному и правильному не правильно🐈⬛ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #sketch
custom 539124490789140728911custom 52651018644367928305custom 53912240944798900643❤1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ✏️✏️✏️✏️ ✏️✏️✏️✏️ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Здесь можно, пиариться, репостить, искать мью ⭐️ https://t.me/PR_from_mars ⭐️ https://t.me/PR_from_mars ⭐️ https://t.me/PR_from_mars ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Приходи, мы рады каждому, ведь именно ты, можешь помочь нашему развитию! ☺️КАНАЛ ПИАРА☺️
>Կᴀᴛ ᴄᴀʍᴏᴨᥙᴀᴩᴀ ᴏᴛ Аᴩᥙᴄу 3κ+ 💍Туᴛ ʍᴏжнᴏ ᴨᥙᴀᴩᥙᴛь ᴄʙᴏᥙ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧы, ʍьюɯᥙᴛᴄя,ᴩᴇᴨᴏᴄᴛᥙᴛь ᴄʙ᧐ᥙ ᴩᴀδᴏᴛы ᥙ ʍᥙᴧᴏ ᴏδщᴀᴛьᴄя 🌹Зᴀ᥊ᴏдᥙʍ ⬇️⬇️⬇️ @sᥲⲙ᧐ρiᥲrᥒyᥲsɦ @sᥲⲙ᧐ρiᥲrᥒyᥲsɦ @sᥲⲙ᧐ρiᥲrᥒyᥲsɦ
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 художников @swmoooopiarrm 9к 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 подборка остальных чатов самопиара 🤩 пиар для начинающих художников 🤩 нсфв пиар и идеи 18+ 🤩 баттлы рисунов 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 АВТОР АРТА @wovawe
🌟🌟Я преисполнилась в своем познании ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🪩Решила вернуться к началу Акрил для меня, долгое время оставался неизведанным материалом, но сейчас ловлю настоящий кайф от процесса 👁Надеюсь в скором времени порадую вас результатом #sketch
❤🔥7custom 52651018644367928305❤4custom 53912449078914072893custom 53912240944798900641
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🌟Где-то летом, рисовала в русалку в магме, решила немного переделать В комментариях будет исходник ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ✨#sketch
🐳10custom 52651018644367928306custom 53912449078914072892
🤩 Rainy days I'm thinkin' 'bout you, what to say Wish I knew how to find the way Right back to you, on rainy days like
custom 539124490789140728913custom 53912240944798900647❤5❤🔥2custom 52651018644367928302
🌟 🌟 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🌟 🌟 ✨✨✨✨✨✨ Готика это про баланс между красотой и тревогой, хрупкостью и холодом. 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤Это про атмосферу, где важны не столько детали, сколько ощущение, будто ты находишься между чем-то живым и чем-то уже почти исчезнувшим. 🌟➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Касаемо арта в зин, я попыталась собрать образ Арлекино и Перро в более готической интерпретации #full #Gothic #Goth
❤🔥8custom 52651018644367928303custom 53912449078914072893❤1custom 53912240944798900641
👻Тут будет море моего саморефлексирования, но есть сжатая версия в конце ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩Долго Есть у меня такая штука. Такое ощущение, что те работы, что я вам показываю, они должны быть доведены мной до того совершенства, которое я могу сделать. Я прекрасно понимаю то, что это тот угол, из которого очень сложно потом выйти. Скетчи-это тот формат, где вроде бы можно дать себе свободу, где можно просто потренироваться с в…
custom 53912449078914072898❤🔥2custom 52651018644367928302❤1
▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️➿➿➿ ➿➿▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ 🐈Если честно, я почти не помню этот мультсериал, вот вообще где-то на уровне: главные герои, пара злодеев и сама идея. ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤚Однако все равно есть приятное чувство ностальгии, когда вспоминаешь. В прошлом посте, я уже спрашивала про ваши любимые мультсериалы, и мне написали про американский дракон Джейк Лонг. Честное моё почтение, я его обожала до появления Гравити Фолз. В деталях …
custom 539124490789140728914❤🔥3custom 52651018644367928303❤2custom 53912240944798900641
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @she_wasgenius. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 667,790 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@she_wasgenius named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DONWON|рест|” (@she_wasgenius), 295 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/she_wasgenius.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.