Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for side notes

Channel

side notes

@shaxruz_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003553609610
TypeChannel
Username@shaxruz_notes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 27 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shaxruz_notes

Growth

576259.57 August 2026 — 62 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62 subscribers16 August 2026 — 59 subscribers18 September 2026 — 57 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 42 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:1957-2
16 Aug 2026, 15:2659-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:0162no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:0662first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4035.1%
😁2219.3%
💯1916.7%
💔1513.2%
custom 588620692488140121176.14%
custom 545641501935903372065.26%
custom 590674822015484301843.51%
custom 587064420966859220910.877%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 6 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2026, 11:03 UTC191 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Kechirvoringe Muhlisa unaq qimang iltimos

😁10💔81💯1

31 Mar 2026, 08:17 UTC251 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ajoyib paradox a? Boy odamlar iloji boricha boy bo'lib ko'rinmaslikka harakat qiladi. Boy bo'lmaganlar qo'llaridan kelgancha boy bo'lib ko'rinishga.

💯84

21 Mar 2026, 22:50 UTC320 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

"Once, I nearly got fcking everything. But nearly doesn't count" - from Peaky Blinders: The immortal man

4

18 Mar 2026, 13:22 UTC347 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#book_reflection 🟩 Odam bo’lish qiyin - O’lmas Umarbekov “Olim bo’lish oson, odam bo’lish qiyin” Birinchi eshitgan audio kitobim bo’lib esimda qolsa kerak. Odatiy qishloq hayoti va insonning o’z kelajagi uchun harakatini ko’rsatib beradigan bu kitobning asil mazmuni insonlar vaqti kelganda ularga ko’proq foyda keltiradigan yo’llarga aldanishidir. Xulosam: bir yo’lni tanlash kerak. Abdulla qilgan ishini to’g’ri de

4

4 Mar 2026, 21:14 UTC330 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

O’zimizni aldashni zo’r yo’llarini bilamiz. Depressiya, motivatsiya yo’qligi, hammadek oylikdan oylikgacha yashamaslik yoki butun dunyoni aylanish “bare minimum” dek qarashimiz… Boriga ko’nishchi? Hammasida hikmat borligini unutmasakchi? Hozir o’zimizda bor narsalarga o’zimiz duo qilib yurganlarimizni eslasakchi? Mo’min inson depressiyaga tushmaydi, manimcha. Hamma narsa yaratganning izni bilan bo’lishi va hali ol

4💯4

8 Feb 2026, 17:29 UTC365 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Sansiz dunyo qorong’i desam ishonmaysan…😂

💔5😁5custom 588620692488140121132💯2

8 Feb 2026, 17:29 UTC367 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁5💯3custom 58862069248814012113💔21

29 Jan 2026, 21:54 UTC459 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Nothing was ruined; it simply never happened. La La Land💔

custom 590674822015484301842custom 54564150193590337202💯1custom 58706442096685922091custom 58862069248814012111

29 Jan 2026, 21:49 UTC406 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#book_reflection 🟩 First Love - Ivan Turgenev "Nimadir o'rgatishdan oldin yaralaydigan narsa - sevgidir" Oxirgi faqat siqiladigan kitoblardan keyin oddiyroq kitob o'qiyman degandim o'xshamadi😅 Kitob orqali inson ichki hissiyotlarni ochib berish qiyin deb o'ylayman. Kitob bir xil "sevdim, kuydim, yomon bo'ldi"dek tuyuladi (aslida shunaqayam, nimadir ma'no qidirishga harakat qilayapman), lekin inson ma'lum muddat o

3custom 54564150193590337202

28 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC302 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#book_reflection 🟩 The Metamorphosis - Franz Kafka "Insondan noma'lum mavjudotga aylanishdanam ko'ra hech kimga foydangiz tegmaganda odamlar o'zgarishi achinarli va qo'rqinchliroq" Kafkaning yozish stili umuman boshqacha, hamma yozuvchilar sizni o'z olamiga olib ketishga va sizni o'sha olamda yashatishga harakat qilsa Kafka iloji boricha sizda savollarni ko'paytirib bo'shliq hosil qiladi. Hikoya bir inson ertalab

5custom 54564150193590337201

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @shaxruz_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“side notes” (@shaxruz_notes), 57 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaxruz_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.