Channel
@shate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002373639095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @bageda @kemoluo @laisuotuo @shate |
| Created | 1 October 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shate |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 13 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 13 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 1 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2024 to 9 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
用户名出售列表（4）🟥 城市集组合出售⭐️ ▶️@haixi 海西 ▶️@ziyang 资阳 ▶️@shate 沙特 ▶️@hanguo 韩国 ▶️@laisuotuo 莱索托 ▶️@kemoluo 科摩罗 ▶️@jiana 加纳 ▶️@tonga 汤加 ▶️@bageda 巴格达 ▶️@dazhou 达州 ▶️@wulanbatuo 乌兰巴托 ▶️@yisitanbuer 伊斯坦布尔 ▶️@jilongpo 吉隆坡 ▶️@helan 荷兰
❤1
高净值用户名商店💗 💕 @Yibao 便捷按钮(点击蓝色文字) 💥租赁用户名 🔻购买用户名 列表1 列表2 列表3 列表4 🆘信息和帮助 业主归@Grape所有 🔤🌹🔤🔤🔤
https://fragment.com/username/shate
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @shate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 896,770 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇸🇦沙特华人@shate” (@shate), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.