Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

шутим вместе с шутяо

@shastiww

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002024522223
TypeChannel
Username@shastiww
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shastiww

Growth

3011 Aug 2026, 12:19 — 30 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:46 — 30 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:1911 Aug 2026, 21:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:4630no change
11 Aug 2026, 12:1930first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52089656926902769342132.8%
🍓1625.0%
custom 54701663836543470721218.8%
custom 5413448699105788627812.5%
💘57.81%
💅23.13%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2024 to 22 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2024, 19:48 UTC132 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

тут до сих пор кто-то есть👀👀

🍓3💅1💘1

1 Sept 2024, 11:04 UTC149 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @thd0wfVideo

i just wanna be one of your girls tonight🌟 ib/scp/rm: @thd0wf буду рада видеть вас на своем тгк😘 можно репосты/реакции🙏 *ссылка на видео в тт* #thd0wf

31 Aug 2024, 13:20 UTC112 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

((

custom 52089656926902769341custom 54134486991057886271custom 54701663836543470721

31 Aug 2024, 13:20 UTC97 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @shytao

ребят, дорогие мои, мне очень грустно это говорить, но всё же.. я решила попробовать новый фандом (вслед за машкой, ага), плюс к этому очень угасла к импровизаторам, долго и часто думала уйти полноценно из фд, позакрывать каналы, но всё же что-то держало, плюс маша не отпускала. но тут у меня что-то щелкнуло в голове и я всё же решилась на этот шаг. очень рада, что вы были со мной этот год (да, уже, наверное, год

🍓1custom 52089656926902769341

26 Aug 2024, 18:30 UTC109 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

у этой принцессы 1 до 80, растет, хорошая😍😍 а ну подписочку!!! эру новому поколению🤩🤩

💘1custom 52089656926902769341custom 54701663836543470721

26 Aug 2024, 16:58 UTC98 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

это должно было выйти, но вряд-ли уже когда-нибудь выйдет

🍓4custom 52089656926902769341custom 54701663836543470721

26 Aug 2024, 16:46 UTC198 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

я пробую последний раз скачать эти видео, если снова не получится и будет тупой этот синий экран, то нахуй этот монтаж

💘1custom 52089656926902769341custom 54701663836543470721

26 Aug 2024, 16:07 UTC97 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

меня послали на три буквы.

🍓1custom 52089656926902769341custom 54134486991057886271custom 54701663836543470721

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shastiww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 954,552 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“шутим вместе с шутяо” (@shastiww), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shastiww.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.