Channel
@sharshglass
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
205subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001580472961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharshglass |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharshglass |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 205 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 204 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 204 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 February 2024 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
299 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 151 | 50.5% | |
| 👏 | 55 | 18.4% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 7.69% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 5.69% | |
| 🌚 | 16 | 5.35% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 4.68% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 3.68% | |
| 🗿 | 8 | 2.68% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2024 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Прочитал пост депутата Липецкого областного совета Николая Быковских о ситуации с бензином и его критику областных властей. Николай, давайте для начала повторим базу. Россия ведет СВО. Наша армия ежедневно наносит удары по объектам ВПК Украины. Украина, не имея преимущества на фронте отвечает ударами по энергетической инфраструктуре, гражданским объектам и жилым домам. Удары по НПЗ выводят предприятия из строя. Он…
👍4❤1
К вопросу, есть ли повышенный спрос на бензин. В июне потребление АИ-95 выросло более чем в полтора раза по сравнению с маем. АИ-92 – примерно в 1,3–1,4 раза. И месяц ещё не закончился. Когда к вопросам логистики добавляется резкий рост спроса, бензин на АЗС заканчивается за часы. Дальше простая арифметика: кто-то заправил сухой бак, а кто-то залил 10 литров и ещё 30 в канистру. У одних запас в гараже, у других сух…
👍4👎3🤣2👏1🙏1
Минутка диванной арифметики. Допустим, бензовоз доставил на АЗС 10 кубов бензина. При заправке по плюс-минус 40 литров этого хватит на плюс-минус 250 машин. Но за последние дни мы уже изменили паттерн поведения из-за тревожности: если есть место в баке, например четвертинка, то зачем ему пустовать? И когда дополнительно в очередь приезжают не только с пустым баком, но ещё с канистрами, бочками и бидонами, топливо з…
👍3👏2🤣1
Сравнительно новая форма украинских фейков — забросить в предложку групп и каналов некую «новость» или её скриншот. Вот и сегодня пытаются убедить всех администраторов, что в Липецке якобы прошёл митинг против СВО, на котором даже кого-то задержали — неких Ольгу и Зину. Причём задержали, конечно же, жёстко. А потом для убедительности добавили дипфейк с губернатором, который якобы признал это ошибкой. Нет, «ребята», …
👍8👏5🗿1🙏1
Юрий Вяземский выбрал скользкую дорожку. Ведущий программы «Умники и умницы», профессор МГИМО, интеллектуал - человек, казалось бы, не глупый. Но в студии тамбовского телеканала выдал: «Дураки пусть живут в Липецке». А заодно - лёгкий реваншизм, мол, неплохо бы вернуть Липецк в состав Тамбовской губернии. Кого вы назвали дураками, профессор? Липецких врачей, спасающих жизни? Ребят на СВО из наших дивизионов? Людей,…
👍104👏26❤5🗿3🌚2
Эта награда — не моя. Эта награда — наша. Всей команды. Всех, кто вкладывает в дело не просто силы, а душу. Кто не считает рабочие часы, а считает результат. Спасибо вам, ребята! Вы — настоящие молодцы. Без вас ничего бы не было. Идём дальше!
👏11❤6👍4😢1🙏1
За несколько дней до переговоров России и США в Эр-Рияде в стримигах вышел американский фильм «Ущелье» (конкретно 14-го февраля 🌚). На награды картина не претендует. Фильм почти категории «Б». Коротко о сюжете: два снайпера, разделённые ущельем, следят за этим самым ущельем. Один с понятным флагом, второй — слегка «размытый», но угадываемый (АК, лучшая водка и реверанс в сторону российского оружия есть). Ущелье в ту…
❤5🌚1🗿1
💳 Еще один вид мошенничества: теперь с ряжеными роботом «Роскомнадзора» и «полицией» в одном флаконе Казалось бы, уже все схемы изучены, все уловки известны, но нет – мошенники не дремлют. Придумали, как «улучшить» схему двух звонков. Намедни о ней рассказал Вилсаком. Итак, звонит вам кто-то из «Почты России» или любой другой службы доставки. Голос приятный, вежливый, почти родной. «У вас посылка, лежит на складе, …
👍5👏5❤1
Какие-то ушлые (и очень глупые) ребята решили прикинуться "официальным" чатом Министерства информационной политики. Наверное, хотят обсудить новость, а заодно и ваши логины с паролями прихватить. Передавайте им привет (нет) и отправляйте туда, где солнце не светит.
🤣6
Повесть. Собрались как-то бывший федеральный чиновник, представитель дорожного бизнеса и член-функционер одной партии. И стали они жаловаться друг другу — как же им досаждает губернатор N-ской области. Никакого житья с ним нету. Воровать не дает, кормушки отобрал, за тендеры спрашивает. Ну не сволочь ли он? И заказали они статью «разоблачительную» на сайте Ruscriminal (заблокирован на территории РФ) и с посевом в т…
👍4👎1
Выбор сделан! #плакатридовки
🌚3❤2👍1👎1
Заголовки мировых СМИ прямо сейчас. А погибшему вчера в Белгороде ребенку был всего год. Но смерть русского ребенка генсек НАТО не будет требовать расследовать и «задавать России Украине неудобные вопросы». opposition figure Alexey Navalny- внесен в список экстремистов и террористов в РФ
👍7😢3❤2👎2👏2🌚1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sharshglass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сядете в беспилотный автобус?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2024 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,010,172 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Очки Шаршакова” (@sharshglass), 205 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharshglass.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.